The integrity of noble way to prove and show real pictures and DNA is ultimately and more important and vital to the treatment of answering the matter regarding raiding the notorious terrorist bin Laden.
To put aside by naming the probability of angering and disturbing the Muslims would be lacking weight of image and proper quality of presidency by releasing pictures.
Obama's embarking to name it as a brave decision in raiding had circled as the indicative confusion of impression of risk and fear in advance, whereby is regarded as no noble but own frightening risk.
In bearing the effect of own predetermined presupposition risk, transpires in clarity of lacking competence by referring false bravery as apparent task in raid.
In continuance of presenting dignity meeting due qualifications and noble deed, issuing aftermath pictures and data of bin Laden can only transform the essentials to the public world.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>
What is said above is viewed as follows:
Ask you this question--Should the president be required to release information , data and true facts to you (e.g.,unemployment rate, US casualties, and not just about bin Laden matter), or to other people or Muslims?
For you people if were the president, and if you already show fear of bin Laden like Obama by being hesitant but finally take the move, that shows you are treating as a risk and untrue illogical, fake bravery known to yourself only to raid bin Laden.
Now what you are saying is that after you shot bin Laden dead, you have fear of Muslims uprising, which demonstrates weakness, lacking strength and toughness, like Obama.
Are the pictures of dead Laden to be released for democratic people as it is a public business, or for Muslims?
Since you regard that as a big risk to take to raid , the risk you think would include the raid as well as presenting pictures if you were to start the thinking of the raid in the first place.
If you have gone that far to be going through with the raid, you should complete it by presenting pictures and DNA to the public world regardless who Muslims are.
You live in a democracy and how your name and image will turn out to be, vest on the judgment and assessment from freedom people, but not the Islams.
You have to demonstrate your integrity in a noble way with real truth and not come by with falsehood.
People want to know there is nothing false about what Obama says concerning bin Laden and 9-11 than the puzzling about Muslims.
That is the only freedom way as a democracy.
Unlike Obama, you would not do that way about Laden if you were a president.
You can be only a dignified president if you do completion.
Many people can do the job of president than Obama.
In other words, if anyone of you is the president, you know very well that you will think thoroughly the complete package before and after the raid to deal with public to give all true answers,including especially the pictures of dead or alive body of bin Laden when you start the task of raid--that is called a completion.
You have gone that far after the raid,and in order to continue to complete it, you ought to give pictures and more data to proceed what you started.
If you don't complete in a competition or examination or job, you can get zero grade or fired.
Integrity with no scheme of falsehood,is ultimately prevailing in such a job of being the president.
Naming Muslims whether to give pictures is a side track, diversion and trivial.
One needs judgment from democratic people's judgment.