BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Read more
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

#104676 Sep 1, 2012
FAKE birther WannaBe wrote:
Blah blah blah as usual.
Oh, it is you again still trying to be me, The ORIGINAL Grand Birther.
You must be infatuated with me, huh?

If you were a Birther, you would be asking why a signature stamp can be moved on a document that was allegedly created as a scan only?

Knowing this is a fact, you would logically conclude that the digital copy is the source document for all copies, and that the PDF file copy had been manipulated as well.

You would be asking why Hawaii DOH didn't come out immediately and explain why their State seal of authenticity is missing from all versions of Obama's fraudulent long form birth certificate.

Oh wait, that's right, YOU'RE NOT A BIRTHER!
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#104677 Sep 1, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Sick little perv.
Did you not come up with the zoo reference? You can resume your , er, hmm, activities now, the kids have moved along, lol.

LRS : why do you keep coming back? Is it SM without the S? Do you finally see how it is possible to reduce an opponent to frustration and scrap, yet not using one profane word? And you make it so easy, so limited are you. Tell you what, contact me, we'll arrange for lessons. First one is free. Ha ha. And tell your "Our Father" American er hmm Lady, I'll take you two and only charge for one.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#104678 Sep 1, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
If the millionaire "payed" (sic) 1.2 million on roughly $8 million gross earned, that is peanuts and blatantly unfair if the middle class worker Èpayed" (sic) the same 15% rate, namely $4,500 on a $30,000 income. And, that base income of $8 million comes AFTER countless loop holes and deductions that the straight-salary guy is not allowed. Keep defending the rich and tell me how they create jobs at a starving yearly income of $30,000 while they rake in the rest.
You're truly dense. If we (and others) are actively drilling that means a rig, crew, chemicals, etc. Those are called jobs. Municipal Bonds jokie, they fund improvement projects all over the country. Man, you're so brainwashed it's sad.
ballantine

United States

#104679 Sep 1, 2012
American Lady wrote:
Jefferson, Thomas, 1743-1826. The Jeffersonian Cyclopedia
Thomas Jefferson Collection
Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library
Back to Table of Contents
8776. VATTEL (Emmerich von), Character of.—[continued].
Vattel is one of the most zealous and constant advocates for the preservation of good faith in all our dealings.—
http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-f...
There seems to be something wrong with your reasoning process. Jefferson citing Vattel on issues unrelated to citizenship doesn't mean he agrees with Vattel on citizenship, a matter of municipal law, not the law of nations. In fact, in 1779 jefferson drafted a statute in virginia adopting jus soli making anyone born in the state a citizen. There is no statement of jefferson supporting the birther view of law. Will you people never learn?
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#104680 Sep 1, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I couldn't help but notice that you didn't answer the question AGAIN! LMAO
I've seen fathom-deep ignorance before, have tried to ligthen the load, and sometimes, for example in your case, it's all for naught. Read your assinine statement again, to wit, have I paid $1.2 million in taxes and my reply. Still don't get it? Sorry, can't help you.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#104681 Sep 1, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
American er hmm Lady's ignorance is not only blatant, it knows no bounds. Again, she has posted another cut-and-paste that shows her hero, Vattel (a foreigner, btw, that she so fears) was an insignificant influence on the founding fathers. This is not what she intended, of course, but then, she does not read so well. And writes not at all.
She's posted about 100% more info than any Buttune has. Is this how you handle everything in your life that doesn't go your way? You remind me of a small child refusing to eat his vegetables.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#104682 Sep 1, 2012
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Has anyone noticed that when Bush was president it was always "US drone strike kills civilians" but Obama's drone strikes never seem to have any collateral damage?
US drone strike kills 5 militants in Pakistan
By ZARAR KHAN | Associated Press –
ISLAMABAD (AP)— U.S. drones fired a barrage of missiles at a vehicle and a house in a Pakistani tribal area bordering Afghanistan on Saturday, killing at least five suspected militants, Pakistani officials said.
The strikes in the North Waziristan tribal area were the first since news that a top commander of the powerful Haqqani militant network was killed in a drone strike late last month, also in the tribal region.
Two intelligence officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to brief the media, said U.S. drones fired seven missiles at targets in the village of Degan in an area of North Waziristan close to the Afghan border.
They said the area is dominated by anti-American militant commander Hafiz Gul Bahadur, but they did not know whether the men killed belonged to his group.
more here;
http://news.yahoo.com/us-drone-strike-kills-5...
Obama aims better.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#104683 Sep 1, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you ever say my bad, I misspoke or I was wrong? You were 100 percent wrong so how does that make her an idiot?
Nope, you don't have to when you are right. That's why I cite everything I say, unlike idiots like you poopoo. I am sorry that you are unable to comprehend what the Justice was saying, you do seem to have trouble with 2+2. But it's not just his words, it is the actions of the court. They have have ample opportunity to take on this case and put it to rest, but they have in fact chosen to do exactly what he said- avoid the question.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#104684 Sep 1, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
We all know how ignoratn you are. Weird, as it seems you insist on showing it to the world.
Based on your grammar and spelling abilities, I would be very cautious about calling anyone "ignoratn".
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

#104685 Sep 1, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you see D’Souza on Bill Maher looking like he just got released from a mental hospital? LOL
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/b...
Bill Maher is a real POS!
D'Souza made him look like the fool that he is.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#104686 Sep 1, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you not come up with the zoo reference? You can resume your , er, hmm, activities now, the kids have moved along, lol.
LRS : why do you keep coming back? Is it SM without the S? Do you finally see how it is possible to reduce an opponent to frustration and scrap, yet not using one profane word? And you make it so easy, so limited are you. Tell you what, contact me, we'll arrange for lessons. First one is free. Ha ha. And tell your "Our Father" American er hmm Lady, I'll take you two and only charge for one.
There was nothing perverse about my zoo comment. You must have "read" it that way (like you do everything else). You must be joking; frustration? Not hardly as you can't make me feel one way or the other. It's delusional to think you can. Funny too. Contact you? Hell, I've been inviting you down for an airboat ride but you won't come! LMAO Stoolpigeon.
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

#104687 Sep 1, 2012
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, I was responding to Ellen's post that it would have been impossible.
I think he was born here.
I think his certificates are frauds.
I think he is lying about his father.
What then, in your opinion, is the reason for the fraudulent certificates?
If he was actually born in Hawaii, there would be no need for a fraudulent birth certificate.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#104688 Sep 1, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Based on your grammar and spelling abilities, I would be very cautious about calling anyone "ignoratn".
Yes, a typo, corrected one or two posts later. And I admit I made it, unlike you. Indeed, about the real grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors you regularly make, which I have brought to your attention, how did you react? You admitted nothing (you just told Poppo how you backed everything you wrote - did you back the spelling of "birther's" in the plural form?). You're 100$ wrong, not man enough to admit it. Poppo is so right. I admit my typos, no problem. You?

Failures like you compensate for their feeble gray matter with name-calling and lies. You are the champ.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#104689 Sep 1, 2012
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
What then, in your opinion, is the reason for the fraudulent certificates?
If he was actually born in Hawaii, there would be no need for a fraudulent birth certificate.
Good point, was wondering about that myself.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#104690 Sep 1, 2012
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
There was nothing perverse about my zoo comment. You must have "read" it that way (like you do everything else). You must be joking; frustration? Not hardly as you can't make me feel one way or the other. It's delusional to think you can. Funny too. Contact you? Hell, I've been inviting you down for an airboat ride but you won't come! LMAO Stoolpigeon.
And what was perverse about MY zoo comment? Is it not well known that zoo monkeys are prone to doing "that" all the time? Was my choice of words in any way perverse? Can you please quote one of those words?

You see, LRS, it's possible for me to discuss "non-discussable" things without using "perverse" language. This is something you are not able to do. Hence, the needs for lessons. And no, but I'm sorry, I cannot give lessons that would increase your intelligence.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#104691 Sep 1, 2012
This is typical New York Times Liberal spin. You see just before this came out there was a report from a Right-Wing source that said that since 2009 family incomes drop 11.1% but the only way the NYT could rebut it was to go back to Clinton's time and then adjust it for inflation.
Yep, more Progressive Smoke and Mirrors to make it sound like the economy is humming along. Just try and convince the 25 million Amercains are out of work!!!!

Family Net Worth Drops to Level of Early ’90s, Fed Says -- By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM--June 11, 2012

WASHINGTON — The recent economic crisis left the median American family in 2010 with no more wealth than in the early 1990s, erasing almost two decades of accumulated prosperity, the Federal Reserve said Monday.
A hypothetical family richer than half the nation’s families and poorer than the other half had a net worth of $77,300 in 2010, compared with $126,400 in 2007, the Fed said. The crash of housing prices directly accounted for three-quarters of the loss.

Families’ income also continued to decline, a trend that predated the crisis but accelerated over the same period. Median family income fell to $45,800 in 2010 from $49,600 in 2007. All figures were adjusted for inflation.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/12/business/ec... [AhfTco]
ballantine

United States

#104692 Sep 1, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
American er hmm Lady's ignorance is not only blatant, it knows no bounds. Again, she has posted another cut-and-paste that shows her hero, Vattel (a foreigner, btw, that she so fears) was an insignificant influence on the founding fathers. This is not what she intended, of course, but then, she does not read so well. And writes not at all.
It is astounding that she doesn't appear to even read her own cut-and-paste posts. Most of her posts either say nothing to support her argument or actually point out she is wrong.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#104693 Sep 1, 2012
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And what was perverse about MY zoo comment? Is it not well known that zoo monkeys are prone to doing "that" all the time? Was my choice of words in any way perverse? Can you please quote one of those words?
You see, LRS, it's possible for me to discuss "non-discussable" things without using "perverse" language. This is something you are not able to do. Hence, the needs for lessons. And no, but I'm sorry, I cannot give lessons that would increase your intelligence.
Insinuations jokieboi. You're really not very bright. Are you ignoratn??? LMAO

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#104694 Sep 1, 2012
Las Vegas Oddsmaker Predicts Obama Will Have a Landslide Loss
Submitted by may on June 22, 2012 - 1:31am
Las Vegas Oddsmaker Wayne Allyn Root predicted that Barack Obama will suffer a massive loss in the General Election even though the current polls do not show Obama necessarily losing. Root stated,

Forget the polls. My gut instincts as a Vegas oddsmaker and common sense small businessman tell me this will be a historic landslide and a world-class repudiation of Obama’s radical and risky socialist agenda. It's Reagan-Carter all over again.

Root laid out the rationale for his prediction. He does have a history of successful political predictions.

Most political predictions are made by biased pollsters, pundits, or prognosticators who are either rooting for Republicans or Democrats. I am neither. I am a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee, and a well-known Vegas oddsmaker with one of the most accurate records of predicting political races.

But as an oddsmaker with a pretty remarkable track record of picking political races, I play no favorites. I simply use common sense to call them as I see them. Back in late December I released my New Years Predictions. I predicted back then- before a single GOP primary had been held, with Romney trailing for months to almost every GOP competitor from Rick Perry to Herman Cain to Newt- that Romney would easily rout his competition to win the GOP nomination by a landslide. I also predicted that the Presidential race between Obama and Romney would be very close until election day. But that on election day Romney would win by a landslide similar to Reagan-Carter in 1980.

Understanding history, today I am even more convinced of a resounding Romney victory. 32 years ago at this moment in time, Reagan was losing by 9 points to Carter. Romney is right now running even in polls. So why do most pollsters give Obama the edge?

First, most pollsters are missing one ingredient- common sense. Here is my gut instinct. Not one American who voted for McCain 4 years ago will switch to Obama. Not one in all the land. But many millions of people who voted for an unknown Obama 4 years ago are angry, disillusioned, turned off, or scared about the future. Voters know Obama now- and that is a bad harbinger.

Root then went on to an analysis of specific groups of voters, for more go to;
http://lubbockonline.com/interact/blog-post/m...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#104695 Sep 1, 2012
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you see D’Souza on Bill Maher looking like he just got released from a mental hospital? LOL
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/b ...
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Bill Maher is a real POS!
D'Souza made him look like the fool that he is.
Poopo is a typical Libtard. He can not attack the man's facts but he can attack him personally. Sad, very sad.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min PolakPotrafi 1,207,841
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 20 min red and right 176,043
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 1 hr Dancing with NFL ... 34,127
News Aryan Nations recruiting again in northern Idaho (Apr '09) 4 hr red and right 427
News Santorum: Race is Identity, Gay is Sexual Conduct (Oct '11) 8 hr nhjeff 373
News Kasich Draws Tea Party Challenger in Ohio (Jan '14) 11 hr swedenforever 46
News Poll: Hillary Clinton still tops in 2016 23 hr scirocco 235
More from around the web