BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Terri Tanna wrote:
I have never supported the current president.

COMPARING PRESIDENCIES AT THE
FORTY-SECOND (42nd) MONTH IN OFFICE
WEALTH CREATION
measured by growth in U.S. equity markets
• 2009-2012: 110.0%
• 1981-1984: 16.5%
-
GDP Growth (after 39 months)
• 2009-2012: 12.2%
• 1981-1984: 28.0%
-
CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE UNITED STATES
measured by the yield on the Ten-Year bond
• 2009-2012: 1.40%
• 1981-1984: 13.87%1
measured by the yield on the Long Bond
• 2009-2012: 2.47%
• 1981-1984: 13.64%1
-
INFLATION
• July 2012: 1.41%
• July 1984: 4.21%
-
UNEMPLOYMENT (without adjustment for frictional)
• July 2012: 8.3%
• July 1984: 9.4%
-
MARGINAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX RATE
measured for a joint filing taxpayer with $66,000 of taxable income
• 2011: 15%
• 1983: 42%
__________
1 inverted yield curve

Please tell the Class which of the two administrations shown above have created the better economy for the United States.
====

Grand Birther wrote:

Really???
Which Administration does your post support?
Reagan or Obama??

I'm just the messenger delivering the FACTS.
You make your own choice. My post shows that GDP grew more during Reagan's first 42 months.
MORE IMPORTANTLY -- tell the Class if you disagree with the accuracy of the posted data or if there are equally important measures of the economy that I did not state. My goal is to be completely neutral and objective, but I bristle when I hear it stated that the economy is not booming. I surveyed a fair number of members at the Club over the weekend, and everyone has made millions in the market over the past three years because higher unemployment (and lower wages) keeps corporate profits high -- and that should be the objective of any administration's economic policies.

Dale wrote:

You don't know the Civil Rights Act of 1866, is the 14th Amendment, and you tell us you studied law!!!
Would that law be the dead English Common Law, died in 1866 and buried in 1868.

Is it your ignorant contention that the exact words of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 are repeated verbatim in Amendment XIV?
BTW, why do you keep avoiding telling the Class that is so eager to learn what is the best book on constitutional law IN YOUR OPINION? The Class hopes that it isn't because you have NEVER STUDIED our sacred Constitution.

Terri Tanna wrote:

Terri Tanna wrote:
"Please name any treaty that the United States of America has ever made with the 'subject of a foreign country.' Thank you."
====
<quoted text>
Let me explain what another poster tried to get into your pea brain about your incredibly poorly written sentence:
The United States does not make treaties with individuals as you stated so stupidly in your post -- it only does so with other sovereign nations. It is not the fault of Topix or those who post here that your skills in the English language are so woefully deficient. Were your parents also linguistically deficient such that you never grew up without proper English being spoken in your home?

Twist much? Hilarious!!

Dale wrote:

Give me the post number!

It's your ignorant post. You should know what you think you wrote. The Class is beginning to think your parents didn't speak English at your house, because your own writing is so sloppy and unpolished.

Scrutiny wrote:

What is someone who is conserned about the economy backing Barack for?

Do you dispute the accuracy and fairness of these data?
COMPARING PRESIDENCIES AT THE
FORTY-SECOND (42nd) MONTH IN OFFICE
WEALTH CREATION
measured by growth in U.S. equity markets
• 2009-2012: 110.0%
• 1981-1984: 16.5%
-
GDP Growth (after 39 months)
• 2009-2012: 12.2%
• 1981-1984: 28.0%
-
CREDITWORTHINESS OF THE UNITED STATES
measured by the yield on the Ten-Year bond
• 2009-2012: 1.40%
• 1981-1984: 13.87%1
measured by the yield on the Long Bond
• 2009-2012: 2.47%
• 1981-1984: 13.64%1
-
INFLATION
• July 2012: 1.41%
• July 1984: 4.21%
-
UNEMPLOYMENT (without adjustment for frictional)
• July 2012: 8.3%
• July 1984: 9.4%
-
MARGINAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX RATE
measured for a joint filing taxpayer with $66,000 of taxable income
• 2011: 15%
• 1983: 42%
__________
1 inverted yield curve

Terri Tanna wrote:

<quoted text>
It's your ignorant post. You should know what you think you wrote. The Class is beginning to think your parents didn't speak English at your house, because your own writing is so sloppy and unpolished.

This coming from a fraud!!! Hilarious!!

Terri Tanna wrote:

Guess that's what happens when someone spends their entire adult life living off the American taxpayer as you have done.

Listen to me, you dumb pompous phony bitch!

How dare you disrespect a man who fought for this country and continues to fight the good fight!
How dare you accuse him of living off the American taxpayer!
What do you call yourself, the person who defends a man that is about nothing but government entitlements?
Why don't you take another position that would fit your schedule?
You know, say talking to those welfare recipients/tenants in places such as Atgeld Gardens.
Because you know if you told the truth, they would kick your ass all over the place.
If Rogue is living off the American taxpayer, as you accuse him of, he earned that by fighting for this country, serving in our distinguished military.
All you did was go to school, listen to someone blah blah blahing to you, and you followed them like a lemming, but you have no common sense.

You are not as great as you think you are.
You're a liar.

Terri Tanna wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course no one can, because you were too intellectually deficient to define "poor." Please give the Class you precise definition.
For purposes of waiving tuition, Yale and Harvard are defining "poor" as families with annual incomes under $125,000. Where does that put most truck drivers?

Where does that put most truck drivers? tuna fish asks:

AT THE TOP.....!!!!
Without TRUCKERS this Country would STARVE to "death".....!

Terri Tanna wrote:

<quoted text>
It's your ignorant post. You should know what you think you wrote. The Class is beginning to think your parents didn't speak English at your house, because your own writing is so sloppy and unpolished.

Just as I thought, "you are full of shit"! You are a prime example, you can polish a turd, when all is said and done, you are still just a turd!

Genesis Land of Confusion
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Siouxweety wrote:

<quoted text>
Listen to me, you dumb pompous phony bitch!
How dare you disrespect a man who fought for this country and continues to fight the good fight!
How dare you accuse him of living off the American taxpayer!
What do you call yourself, the person who defends a man that is about nothing but government entitlements?
Why don't you take another position that would fit your schedule?
You know, say talking to those welfare recipients/tenants in places such as Atgeld Gardens.
Because you know if you told the truth, they would kick your ass all over the place.
If Rogue is living off the American taxpayer, as you accuse him of, he earned that by fighting for this country, serving in our distinguished military.
All you did was go to school, listen to someone blah blah blahing to you, and you followed them like a lemming, but you have no common sense.
You are not as great as you think you are.
You're a liar.

"I" Second THAT :)

The Bellowing Buttunes have once again been severely clownstomped. Hilarious!!

Terri Tanna wrote:

<quoted text>
Is it your ignorant contention that the exact words of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 are repeated verbatim in Amendment XIV?
BTW, why do you keep avoiding telling the Class that is so eager to learn what is the best book on constitutional law IN YOUR OPINION? The Class hopes that it isn't because you have NEVER STUDIED our sacred Constitution.

Be they verbatim or not, the 14th Amendment is the Civil Rights Act of 1866, just placed where marxist like yourself can not overturn it without an amendment to the US Constitution.
The remainder of your post is irrelevant!

This admin is about to be flushed!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/23/im...

Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
The Class is betting you can't state any two of those "proven principles" because you don't know anything about Economics and can only recite uncritically what others say. Prove the Class wrong.

LRS wrote:

<quoted text>
You've been worn completely out. Rode hard and put up wet! JUST TOO DAMN HILARIOUS!!

Well, I do know that during the Dot.Com bubble of the late 1990's I got in late and got of late and lost a bundle. But I leanred and I times the HousTerri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
The Class is betting you can't state any two of those "proven principles" because you don't know anything about Economics and can only recite uncritically what others say. Prove the Class wrong.
Well, I have learned. During to Dot.Com Bubble I got in late and got out late and lost a bundle. But I got out at the peaks of the Housing Bubble, the Stock Market Bubble and the Precious Metal Bubble and I have done real well.
Yep, I am retired and life is good. My nurse girl fiend should be waking up and will the next two days off soooooo I plan on doing plenty of nursing the next few days.
She works the grave yard shift and get's home about 8:00 a.m. and then sleeps until about 4:00 pm. and that is how we met last Fall. I like going fishing on Thursdays so I can catch my Friday evening meal and when the weather is good I take my Chihuahuas. They have little life jackets.
So when I get back to the dock around 4:00 p.m. I tie up my boat, walk my dogs and then get my pickup to drag the boat out of the water. Well, here was this nice looking lady doing her jogging and she stopped to pet my dogs. And before you knew it .... we were cooking fish up in her condo.
I call my Chihuahuas my "Chick Magnets"!

LRS wrote:

The Bellowing Buttunes have once again been severely clownstomped. Hilarious!!

And just think....
It's right here in front of God and Everybody...
PLUS...Future "generations" to SEE! ;-)

They don't call iT....

The WORLD WIDE WEB
for nothing!

tee hee hee

Oh, to be honest with you, anyone who does not like dogs is not worth the time!

Have you noticed that Conservatives like dogs while Libtards like cats? Just think about that a while!

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Oh, to be honest with you, anyone who does not like dogs is not worth the time!

Anyone "a dog doesn't LIKE"...isn't either :)

LRS wrote:

This admin is about to be flushed!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/23/im...

Ya know I thought it was funny that the Libtards thought that Bush was stupid and that Dick Cheney pulled his strings. Well, it is Valery Garrett who pulls Obama's strings. I seems Valery talked Obama out of the UBL Raid three times before Hillary and Panetta convinced him to go ahead. See, I told you guys so and now the truth finally out.
Hillary's balls are bigger than Obama's are.