Sorry birfoon:<quoted text>
The judge refused to acknowledge the evidence, so he could rule for the defendant who was a no-show.
If the judge had acknowledged the evidence, he could not have ruled for the usurper.
You are so damn STUPID, I just have to laugh, Poopoo stain.
“ Plaintiffs asked this Court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence. The Court granted Plaintiffs' request.”
“This Decision is entirely based on the law, as well as the evidence and legal arguments presented at the hearing.”
“The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs' allegations.”
If the judge never heard the case on its merits then why did he say it was meritless?