Maybe you’re having a problem with the word acknowledged. The “evidence” was in fact acknowledged and was found to be faulty.<quoted text>
It was a sham decision and you know it!
The decision astounds common sense.
The judge refused to acknowledge the evidence, so he could rule for the defendant who was a no-show.
If the judge had acknowledged the evidence, he could not have ruled for the usurper.
You are so damn STUPID, I just have to laugh, WoTARD!
“Given the UNSATISFACTORY EVIDENCE presented by the plaintiffs, the court concludes the plaintiffs’ claims are not persuasive.”
DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE MICHAEL MALIHI
“Ma'am, we're all attorneys. I think we know what natural born citizen means
100 percent hearsay. And then we have several pages of typed transcript, which I've read some of, and it's actually pretty ridiculous, but again, 100 percent hearsay”
INDIANA ELECTIONS COMMISSION
“Counsel’s frivolous and sanctionable conduct wasted the Defendants’ time and valuable judicial resources that could have been devoted to legitimate cases pending with the Court.
Counsel failed to make coherent legal arguments but instead wasted the Court’s time with press conference sound bites and speeches”
JUDGE CLAY LAND
To be continued when everyone stops laughing long time.