BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
59,541 - 59,560 of 174,508 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67020
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
The extent the Libtards will go to cover up data. I thought sea levels were going to continue to go up as the globe warmed buttttt....
This from the Washington Post!!!
Weather cycles cause a drop in global sea level, scientists find
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health...
Oh, they admit that the sea levels are DROPPING but it is caused by "weather cycles"!!! As if Global Cooling is not a weather cycle!!! They won't come out and say Global Cooling as they are a hopin' that it will be a changin' back to Global Warming and the sea levels will once again rise!!!
Learn how to read, Rouge.

Rouge, in hallucination mode: "Oh, they admit that the sea levels are DROPPING."

“'This year the continents got an extra dose of rain, so much so that global sea levels actually fell over most of the last year,' said Carmen Boening.”

In Rouge-speak, this means that "sea levels are dropping" due to global cooling.

"Climate scientist Josh Willis, who also works at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, warned that this water will eventually return to the ocean, and the long-term trend of rising sea levels will continue."

Grow up.

Cover-up? Put down the pipe, Rouge.
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67022
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny, he was talking about your pencil prick.
The mayor was talking about your conversation with him and how you continually tried to direct the topic back to Clinton's penis. Now everybody on Topix knows that you are in love with Clinton's penis, so why deny it????

Just like a republiKKKan to deny the truth.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67023
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Heavy Hitter wrote:
<quoted text>
The judge refused to acknowledge the evidence, so he could rule for the defendant who was a no-show.
If the judge had acknowledged the evidence, he could not have ruled for the usurper.
You are so damn STUPID, I just have to laugh, Poopoo stain.
Sorry birfoon:

“ Plaintiffs asked this Court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence. The Court granted Plaintiffs' request.”

“This Decision is entirely based on the law, as well as the evidence and legal arguments presented at the hearing.”

“The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs' allegations.”
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
If the judge never heard the case on its merits then why did he say it was meritless?
Obama can not be serious

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67027
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
I have dark Karama because I support Pelosi & Reed? Then you do not understand what Karam is. According to Buddhist theory, every time a person acts there is some quality of intention at the base of the mind and it is that quality rather than the outward appearance of the action that determines the effect. If one appears to be benevolent but acts with greed, anger or hatred, then the fruit of those actions will bear testimony to the fundamental intention that lay behind them and will be a cause for future unhappiness. The Buddha spoke of wholesome actions (P. kusala-kamma, S. ku&#347;ala-karma) that result in happiness, and unwholesome actions (P. akusala-kamma, S. aku&#347;ala-karma) that result in unhappiness. The Buddha also elaborated that it was impossible for virtuous action to produce unfavorable results, and for nonvirtuous action to produce favorable results.
Basically by posting very negative words against people results in a negative way on your Karma.
Oh I know what karma is sweety...this is a forum and absolutely no action has been taken..Get it?....Only words back and forth..get it?...BTW nice cut and past You plagiarized without giving credit where credit is due...taking credit for someone Else's words...Hummm be lookin over your shoulder cause your karma is kreeping up on you...LOL

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67028
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Heavy Hitter wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a sham decision and you know it!
The decision astounds common sense.
The judge refused to acknowledge the evidence, so he could rule for the defendant who was a no-show.
If the judge had acknowledged the evidence, he could not have ruled for the usurper.
You are so damn STUPID, I just have to laugh, WoTARD!
Sorry birfoon, he did "acknowledge the evidence". Too bad it was worthless.

“The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs' allegations.”

What part of "little, if any, probative value," does Tacky not comprehend?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry birfoon:
“ Plaintiffs asked this Court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence. The Court granted Plaintiffs' request.”
“This Decision is entirely based on the law, as well as the evidence and legal arguments presented at the hearing.”
“The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs' allegations.”
Obama can not be serious

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67029
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Obama2012 wrote:
Terri Tanna and Poppo, 69 partners.
Terri aka Titty City is not a giver ... So Poppo is just a stain she leaves when she stands up
Obama can not be serious

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67031
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Your eloquent prose closely resembles Heavy Hitter'a, GB's, Marcus, Rush's, American er hmmm Lady etc. They all have uneducated and vulgarity in common. Keep proving me right. Oh,how frustrating it must be that I don't reply in kind.
The FACT that you reply at all is enough ... We know who and what you are there Canada.....No better than the most vulgar person on this thread...You just try and I emphasize TRY to disguise it...You fail miserably...We see you
Obama can not be serious

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67032
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
He votes his conscious, Poppo. Must be something we don't know about. Maybe the only time he's CONSCIOUS and not drunk or stoned is when he votes. NOT. Drunk or stoned probably explains so well why he votes the way he does.
See there ya go ..Trying to disguise you vulgarity..BITCH
You are the worst form of pond scum.....I at least own my vulgarity

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67037
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Heavy Hitter wrote:
This administration is the most incompetent, inefficient, irresponsible, immoral, and inept in U.S. history.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/arti...
Wrong That belongs to President Richard Milhous Nixon the dirtiest corrupt person in U.S history
Frank

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67038
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong That belongs to President Richard Milhous Nixon the dirtiest corrupt person in U.S history
Barack Hussein Obama is the most corrupt politician in the history of The United States.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67039
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Barack Hussein Obama is the most corrupt politician in the history of The United States.
Then how do you rate Nixon then???
Johannes

Yucaipa, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67040
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Barack Hussein Obama is the most corrupt politician in the history of The United States.
You must have been born after Nixon left office in disgrace.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67041
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Grow up.
GISS is located at Columbia.
"The institute is a laboratory in the Earth Sciences Division of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center and a unit of the Columbia University Earth Institute."
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/
No, GISS stands for Goddard Institute of Space Studies and is part of Godard Institutes which are part of the National Science Foundation. Congress ordered NASA to cooperate with them.
Dr. Hansen is not an employee of NASA!
Oh, the reason why they are located at Columbia U. is because... they are a part of Columbia U.
Just like the Endowment of the Arts, the National Science Foundation should be de-funded!!!
The "opinions" of Dr. Hansen are not the opinion of NASA!!!

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67042
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Johannes wrote:
<quoted text>
You must have been born after Nixon left office in disgrace.
Nope Born In 1964 Yes even when they had the Watergate Hearing on tv i was watch and wondering what was going on. I wanted to know.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67043
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I brought this out just a few days ago but you Libtards seem so hard of reading.
Earier this year NASA-GISS claimed that 2011 was the 9th warmest year on record bu NASA-MSFC says that 2011 was the coolest year since 1998 and they both can not be right, can they?
After all, there are 13 years between 1998 and 2010 and they are all warmer than 2011. And 13 does not equal 9, does it?
So, who is lying?
NASA-GISS got caught cooking their data books in early 2009.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67044
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
Then how do you rate Nixon then???
Well, Nixon was the most progressive REPUBLICAN president we ever had. He helped create the EPA and OSHA, tried to federalize the national health care, tried to institute wag and price controls, etc.
The only thing that he did that was illegal was try and cover up the Watergate break in. He had no prior knowledge nor did he consent to the break in but he did try and cover it up.
Now, compare that to Bill Clinton who did commit perjury in a Federal court, commit perjury in a Federal Grand Jury, Obstructed Justice, suborned a false affidavit from Monica Lewinsky, conspired to obtain a false affidavit from Linda Tripp and submitted two false affidavits to a Federal Court.
But what I just said will never stop you from obfuscating the truth because .... you area a Libtard and can not help yourself!!!
Did Clinton resign? NO! But Nixon did because the Republican senators told him they would.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67045
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Here is a part of a speech a person gave when running for President on Religion
Whatever one’s religion in private life may be, for the office-holder, nothing takes precedence over his oath to uphold the Constitution and all its parts – including the First Amendment and the strict separation of church and state

I want anyone to guess which person running for President said this.

If no one guesses in a couple of days i will post the name of the person

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67046
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong That belongs to President Richard Milhous Nixon the dirtiest corrupt person in U.S history
Know, I would rate Woodrow Wilson as the most corrupt with Obama coming in second.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67047
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Heavy Hitter wrote:
This administration is the most incompetent, inefficient, irresponsible, immoral, and inept in U.S. history.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/arti...
And the Libtards will disagree as they think Obama really cares and all he cares about is his own money!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67048
Mar 17, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
You live under a rock?
VIRGINIA FRAUD PROBE CUT OFF
ACADEMIC FREEDOM: State Supreme Court spurns Attorney General's attempt to obtain climate researcher's records
VIRGINIA'S HIGHEST COURT has ended a politically charged fraud investigation of a climate-change researcher, denying state Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II (R) access to the scientist's records.
"This is an important decision that will be welcomed here and in the broader higher education community," UVA President Teresa Sullivan says. The university argued that Cuccinelli's probe was an "unprecedented attempt to challenge a university professor's peer reviewed data, methodologies, and conclusions" that would "infringe academic freedom and chill scientific debate."
Michael Halpern, manager of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Scientific Integrity Program, commends UVA for challenging Cuccinelli’s probe. The court's ruling means, he says, that "Virginia will remain a safe place for scientific research, even when elected officials don't like the results.
Chemical and Engineering News, March 12, 2012, p.11.
----------
"I'm pleased that this particular episode is over,"
Mann says." It's sad, though, that so much money and
resources had to be wasted on Cuccinelli's witch hunt
against me and the University of Virginia."
Sooo, you think one court action makes it over? Hasn't worked with Obama. has it?
The issue is that Dr. Michael Mann's research was funded by U.S. tax dollars and as such must comply with the Freedom of Information Act of 1974. He, like all Climatgaters, is trying to cover up his lies and distortions.
This is just another reason why we should defund the National Science Foundation who funds these loony-lefties.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••