Who gets your vote for president in November?

Kristie wrote:

Right now I can't see that I can stomach voting for any of the three.

Ain't that the truth. Let's just say its President John McCain.

The road is long and more runners will be on it, don't give up hope.

Here's my opinion of John McCain, another DEMOCRAT in REPUBLICANS clothing. you need to check out Senator John McCain's voting record as a Senator from Arizona.

I'll be voting for RALPH NADER.

Hillary has sweaty balls.

Wher's Ron Paul?

Wher's my "e?"

Ron Paul.

Mo Lubee wrote:

The Clinton people rejoice now in their Preacher Wright manuever

I don't think any American can rejoice in the racist and hateful psuedo-religion of Obama and his mentor.
Thoughtful Americans do not want a slick imposter for President and will not vote in that America hating crowd.

Obama is damaged goods.

Newt, where are you? Help!

It is interesting to me the depth of the animosity so many people hold towards Black people. So many posters try so hard to believe that Barack never writes his own speeches, but is simply a puppet for whoever writes his speeches.

I think what really bothers them is the intellect of Barack. As soon as he speaks they have inner conflict in realization that this Black man is better educated, more intelligent and more articulate than they are.

They refuse to believe he writes his own speeches because to admit that would be to tacitly admit to themselves they are intellectually inferior to this Black man.

These racists live in a fantasy world, where the only lower rung than themselves on the social food chain is in their view, occupied by Blacks... so they do and say everything within their power to reinforce their warped concept.

Now take your case... you are very worried about Barack's link to a Pastor he sees perhaps 5 times a year, but you question not his link to an old Irish drunk that has left a girl to die underwater in a car, without attempting to get help. Yes, I refer to Senator Kennedy.

I would list Hillary's lengthy list of links that don't seem to concern you, but I don't have room. Suffice it to say she can't run either a marriage or a campaign, while keeping either one solvent, but she wants to run the country.

Ahhhh, but it isn't that the man is black... it's just those pesty "links" of his, right?

The dead giveaway is the way the racist hacks feel constrained to accuse Obama of being "racist" in the process.

Yes, that Preacher Wright makes a great excuse and provides adequate cover, doesn't he?

Oh, and by the way, I'm white.

And if it seems like I view many of the people who oppose Barack as having some degree of racial motivation, it's because I do.

You see, when push comes to shove, we have two candidates with almost identical voting records, political philosophies and political positions.

The differences boil down to one candidate being white with a history of constantly doing underhanded back room deals, with a slew of questionable fat cat contributors, and with a philandering husband who has been an embarrassment to the Oval Office and the Country the last time he got into the White House.

The other candidate is an attractive Black well-educated man with a sincerity and willingness to negotiate outlook that is refreshing and full of promise. He is articulate, intelligent and carries none of the negatives and baggage of the other candidate.

So who in there right mind would vote for the candidate with a record of debauchery in the Oval Office? Who would vote for the conniving Clintons to once again occupy the office they disgraced?

Wellllll, I would have to say it is a voter who is more concerned about race than they are honor, about color than they are embarrassment, about preventing the alternative, rather than actual support of debauchery.

Sorry, but that's the way I see it.

I think a lot of these Hillary-Hacks need to look within themselves and ask themselves what part of Hillary and Bill's infamous record they consider less important than what Pastor Barack listens to in Church 4 or 5 times a year.

Obama will be a great president IN 8 YEARS. By then he will have the experience. Go Hillary

Not much of a choice out there, but for right now, it's McCain.

elpasotxrox98 wrote:

Go Hillary '08!

Hillary need to drop out she can't win!
Go Obama!

TruthBeKnown wrote:

It is interesting to me the depth of the animosity so many people hold towards Black people. So many posters try so hard to believe that Barack never writes his own speeches, but is simply a puppet for whoever writes his speeches.
I think what really bothers them is the intellect of Barack. As soon as he speaks they have inner conflict in realization that this Black man is better educated, more intelligent and more articulate than they are.
They refuse to believe he writes his own speeches because to admit that would be to tacitly admit to themselves they are intellectually inferior to this Black man.
These racists live in a fantasy world, where the only lower rung than themselves on the social food chain is in their view, occupied by Blacks... so they do and say everything within their power to reinforce their warped concept.
Now take your case... you are very worried about Barack's link to a Pastor he sees perhaps 5 times a year, but you question not his link to an old Irish drunk that has left a girl to die underwater in a car, without attempting to get help. Yes, I refer to Senator Kennedy.
I would list Hillary's lengthy list of links that don't seem to concern you, but I don't have room. Suffice it to say she can't run either a marriage or a campaign, while keeping either one solvent, but she wants to run the country.
Ahhhh, but it isn't that the man is black... it's just those pesty "links" of his, right?
The dead giveaway is the way the racist hacks feel constrained to accuse Obama of being "racist" in the process.
Yes, that Preacher Wright makes a great excuse and provides adequate cover, doesn't he?
Oh, and by the way, I'm white.
And if it seems like I view many of the people who oppose Barack as having some degree of racial motivation, it's because I do.
You see, when push comes to shove, we have two candidates with almost identical voting records, political philosophies and political positions.
The differences boil down to one candidate being white with a history of constantly doing underhanded back room deals, with a slew of questionable fat cat contributors, and with a philandering husband who has been an embarrassment to the Oval Office and the Country the last time he got into the White House.
The other candidate is an attractive Black well-educated man with a sincerity and willingness to negotiate outlook that is refreshing and full of promise. He is articulate, intelligent and carries none of the negatives and baggage of the other candidate.
So who in there right mind would vote for the candidate with a record of debauchery in the Oval Office? Who would vote for the conniving Clintons to once again occupy the office they disgraced?
Wellllll, I would have to say it is a voter who is more concerned about race than they are honor, about color than they are embarrassment, about preventing the alternative, rather than actual support of debauchery.
Sorry, but that's the way I see it.
I think a lot of these Hillary-Hacks need to look within themselves and ask themselves what part of Hillary and Bill's infamous record they consider less important than what Pastor Barack listens to in Church 4 or 5 times a year.

I don't care if he's purple I wouldn't vote for him. Race has nothing to do with it for me. We have every race in our family. Hillary's white and so is McCain and I don't want to vote for either of them. Is that because they are white? I'm sick and tired of this whole race thing.

IS Barack Hussein Obama the Antichrist?

www.youtube.com/watch...

or google 'is barack the antichrist'.

Ron Paul all the way!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

JFunk wrote:

Newt, where are you? Help!

I agree, Newt would be a good man to lead the nation, but, unfortunately I think he is avoiding it because of the garbage he would have to deal with.
He's got the experience, the intelligence, and the fore sight that is needed now.
The americansolutions.com sight is a great work of listening to the people and he should be commended for this work.
Hillery is same ol', same ol' and a power hungry maniac with less experience than the Whitehouse cook. She doesn't listen to the people.
Obama is elegant, intelligent, and charismatic, but, does not listen to the people on many issue's.
McCain has the experience, is a war hero but also does not pay attention to the American people and admits he doesn't have a clue about economic's.
We deserve some one to sit in that chair who listens to our needs instead of some one that thinks he/she knows better then the people. We need a president to represents us for a change.
I think that the people have proven that race and gender have less to do with our choice and am really getting tired of "the white man's burden" garbage.
It ain't over till the fat lady sings, there are more choices to come and a third party has the greatest opportunity then ever before.

Mo Lubee wrote:

The Clinton people rejoice now in their Preacher Wright manuever, but there will be a long interval between now and November a lot of water will go over the dam.
Elements of the Press such as Fox News will try to keep it alive and rescusitate it later, but eventually there will be a backlash against racially motivated attacks, as the voters really get to know, like and trust Barack himself. Barack is a likeable guy of great intellect, discipline and ability; this will show through over time.
Barack has the nomination won, Florida and Michigan dashed Hillary's last hopes. Now all Barack has to do is keep control of the high ground, let the Clintons be the Clintons, and the actual election campaign will take care of itself.
I don't bother to post much against Hillary any more, because I know our work is done in that regard, Hillary is a non-factor at this point.
The November election will be about age against youth, new against old, the past against the future, war against peace, failed disasterous policies against vigorous enthusiastic leadership advocating new solutions, an energetic young articulate leader projecting an image of a dynamic imaginative America, against a doddering hesitant old man projecting an image of bungling failed Bush policies.
Even the Republicans know McCain is a very poor candidate. The Press which pats him on the head now while keeping their powder dry, will turn on McCain like rabid dogs in the general election, with the exception of FOX Propaganda "News".
McCain will have two choices; to not debate and tacitly admit he can't begin to compete with Obama in a public head-to-head discussion of the issues, or he can take the stage against Obama, offering a stark contrast with the candidate of a generation whose time has come, and prove all of the above to be true.
McCain is already having senior moments; the pressure of the campaign is going to weigh heavily upon this old man and he is not going to respond well. McCain is elderly in every sense of the word.
Barack Obama is destined to be our next great American President.

Your observation of McCain says alot about who you are, YOU'RE A BIG JACK-AZZ.
Barack, some call him the Magic Negro, is so green and having a hell of a time trying to find himself. His speech in platitude and his southern preacher mannerism are not catching on with the most likely voters from Democrats and independent. His desperation to gain foothold begins to show, so he got Bill Richardson's endorsement the other day. This move is obviously to entice Hispanics votes, what he doesn't realize is Richardson typically isn't accepted by majority of Hispanics in the country. As you know already, Hispanics will not side with any blacks. I think your reaction to Obama is like a teenager got his/her car....all emotion.