Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 305,849
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Full Story

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#246961 Jul 2, 2012
John-K wrote:
<quoted text>
You forgot to include that I'm also smoking shavings of banana peel while standing on my head!
;P
How've you been 'Foo?
Hot as all hell up by you?
Halfway through Tom Perrotta's "The Leftovers." Only took me twelve hours to get there and that was interrupted by nine hours of work today. One of the better books on a "rapture"-like event and infinitely better than "Left Behind."
I JUST started that one! Picked it up after I heard the interview with the author on NPR the other day. THat's part of why I'm up so late LOL!

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#246962 Jul 2, 2012
Considering how many comic book characters you;ve used as avatars, you must buy them by the pound.
bluestreak prime wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, well, comic books are inexpensive: I know how your crowd loves a good bargain!

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#246963 Jul 2, 2012
Oops! While you;re on here spewing hate, another abortion was performed. And you had no say in it at all. Never will.

Now clutch your self-righteous impotence to your bosom as you drift off to sleep. How many more will be done as you slumber?
SassyJM wrote:
<quoted text> What a whining little baby you are. Why are you following him? Prove your two year old temper tandrums ( that he 'gets' others to do anything let alone report people 'for him')
While your at it.....get a life OR a clue...whatever comes first...will ya?
Waaaaaa waaaaaa
LOL

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#246964 Jul 2, 2012
We all know what kind of huge prick you are. Nobody, however, believes it's what you have.
SeattleVehix44 wrote:
<quoted text>
om, im sorry but you should see this thing, you just can't imagine - i mean it should have its own zip code

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#246965 Jul 2, 2012
Whatever else RC might be, I can assure you that she is her own woman and playing both sides for her amusement. A dullard like blueboy could never control her.
Seven wrote:
<quoted text>
You've done a nice job of coming undone and showing that you are either bluestreak prime yourself or you are in league with him and have been deceiving people. Your act has been compromised by your behavior on here tonight.

“The one who knows”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#246969 Jul 2, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
First off, I'm not your "pal". I find bigots like you repulsive. And you think this is me being "hardcore", ROFLMAO! Irving, you ain't SEEN hardcore from me yet and frankly I likely wouldn't bother with the likes of you. You're not even a good troll.
Second, you think because you trade a few insults with someone that it makes it okay to make racist, bigoted comments like you've made? Are you THAT unintelligent that you have to sink to that level to get what you think is a rise out of someone? REALLY?
Becasue I called you out for the idiot you came here being, you thought that makes your anti-semetic remarks fair game?
You flat out lied when you claimed you're not a racist. Or maybe you're not lying and you REALLY ARE that stupid and foolish.
Either way, you're right in Skanky's league. A dolt. Fools like you and she a whole new meaning to the term "Confederacy of Dunces". In fact, you remind me of one of my favorite quotes from that: "You can always tell employees of the government by the total vacancy which occupies the space where most other people have faces."
Translation: you're just another troll, and a poor one at that.
You're as bad as that idiot Tomtom who when he can't think of something to insult someone with, calls them a 'lesbian pagan'.
Now RACH is a great troll. She's managed to not only offend, but make some good friends at the same time over the years LOL!
Wow, buddy, you sound mad!
JamesPA

Morristown, TN

#246970 Jul 3, 2012
Lets say a baby was born into a disfuctional family then is raped by one of her family members and becomes pregnant should she not be able to get a abortion? I believe it should be the womens choice, And religion should stay out of it specially considering religion has changed 100s of times ever since it was created to supress the poor, Best way to control the poor would be to create a religion give them something to believe in that would make them think if they do something wrong would go to hell, I believe in god but not books written by humans and churchs that make profits have you ever seen a pastors yearly income upwards of 320k a year....

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#246971 Jul 3, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you are name calling and still pretending it is ME that is angry?? I didn't call you ignorant. In fact, you've called me names twice, now. Why? You are really very intolerant and the "whatever reason" I seem "angry to 'you'" is no reason at all other than you are just making up the anger as an ad hominem attack.
I am not wrong in saying that there is no god. Why are you insisting I am? You admitted you can not prove a god exists and without proof, it doesn't. That's a FACT.
You don't get to tell me how to phrase things. Only angry people try to control others.
You are the one that posted first to tell me I was posting something YOU didn't like. Then you told me I was wrong again and called me names. Then you called me and others, perhaps other atheists, "ignorant". Please stop being angry at people who don't believe in your myth. Please stop projecting YOUR anger on to others. Thank you.
Why are you "christians" so hateful??
I'm still waiting for proof that there is a God.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#246972 Jul 3, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, that's what you'll need, not what is required to say. And your example is terrible. There are many ways to get to California from New York. There is only one criteria for a fetus to be viable and that is the 50/50 litmus test alone. If your example said "I have the ability to fly to California" then you'd probably be right, because it's not explicit whether you're flying as a passenger or a pilot. But the definition I posted lays only one requirement; being able to survive outside the womb.
You've already agreed that medical assistance isn't a requirement for viability, so why are you being so ambivalent and asking for explicitly when you know the lack thereof does not mean medical assistance is inferred?
"You've already agreed that medical assistance isn't a requirement for viability, so why are you being so ambivalent and asking for explicitly when you know the lack thereof does not mean medical assistance is inferred?"

Probably because PC pinheads keep trying to claim that viability EXCLUDES medical assistance. The same PC pinheads who tried to claim that we've been saying that viability means all fetuses need medical assistance to be considered viable. That perception of what we've said was way out there, far, far away from the reality of what we've said.

Just because medical assistance is not a requirement for a fetus to be considered viable, it does not amount to being the same thing as a fetus needing medical assistance being non-viable.

Just because some definitions don't mention medical assistance, does not mean medical assistance is EXCLUDED for a fetus to be considered viable. Just like some definitions that mention medical assistance, does not mean medical assistance is REQUIRED for a fetus to be considered viable.

Intelligent people know how to look at all definitions of the same word and apply the ones that apply to a specific topic, and use all that apply to understand what the word means.

Viability is the potential (the possibility) of a fetus to survive outside of the womb, with OR without medical assistance.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#246973 Jul 3, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Antisemitism in several of your posts now. I guess you lied about not being a racist.
I'm curious, who has he made anti-semetic remarks to or about?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#246974 Jul 3, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm curious, who has he made anti-semetic remarks to or about?
Try reading his posts.@@
Kenose

Westbury, NY

#246975 Jul 3, 2012
God Is The Only Choice wrote:
<quoted text>
Which statement exactly would that be?
I quoted it, you dimwit.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#246976 Jul 3, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
I quoted it, you dimwit.
These idiots selective blindness is stupifying.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#246977 Jul 3, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Try reading his posts.@@
Why should I when I knew LNM had? If you have read his posts as well, why can't you just answer a simple question? OR, here's an idea, refrain from posting anything if you don't have an answer. Your obsessive compulsive need, to post something to every single one of the posts I make, is obvious.

I've seen some of his posts and for the most part he's just trying to get under the skin of the PC, and doing a good job at it from the reactions of you idiots. Giving back what you all dish out seems to do the trick. So, I don't really have an interest in reading each of his posts, or anyone else's who spends the majoirity of their time here just doing that. Of the posts I've seen from him, there wasn't any anti-semitism. If there is, I wondered who it was directed to.

Your issue to deal with if you have a problem with people asking questions in a discussion forum, Toots.

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#246978 Jul 3, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>Rach has NEVER been secretive in her reason for being here that I know of, and I've known her now for almost what, 5 or 6 years Rach?

We get it. You dont like her. Many dont, but you're choosing the wrong thread to continue your not-so-silent war with her, as many of us do hold her in high regard, myself included. From much of what you've said, I'd say you're basing your opinion OF her on her admitted trolling, but SOME of us know her better.
Yeah, sorry, beg to differ. She's a troll. Was always a troll. Is still a troll. Pretended not to be.

That's one big lie, no better than Lyin Lynne D.

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#246979 Jul 3, 2012
cpeter1313 wrote:
<quoted text>Whatever else RC might be, I can assure you that she is her own woman and playing both sides for her amusement. A dullard like blueboy could never control her.
He doesn't have to control her. She is a troll. She gets off on the disruption just like he does. She reports for the hell of it. It's a GAME.

What's the difference? A troll is a troll.

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#246980 Jul 3, 2012
What I find mind boggling and stupefying is that one troll is bad and evil, yet the other troll, who plays the exact same bait and report games is A-ok. One poster that lies about who she is and posts under different ids is to be hounded and ridiculed BUT another just like her isn't

Pathetic double standard.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#246981 Jul 3, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should I when I knew LNM had?
Perhaps because you could avoid making an ass of yourself.

Again.
If you have read his posts as well, why can't you just answer a simple question? OR, here's an idea, refrain from posting anything if you don't have an answer.
Since he made bigoted comments to me in this thread, the answer is HERE if you bothered to read them Lynne you fkin MORON.
Your obsessive compulsive need, to post something to every single one of the posts I make, is obvious.
Lynnie, I made you a promise a LONG time ago, and reiterated it many times, that I would take EVERY opportunity to spotlight your ignorance and stupidity on every occasion I could.

And you make it SO easy after all. And speaking of "A Confederacy of Dunces", this quote fits you PERFECTLY:

"'It's not your fate to be well treated,' Ignatius cried.'You're an overt masochist. Nice treatment will confuse and destroy you." Pg. 367
I've seen some of his posts and for the most part he's just trying to get under the skin of the PC, and doing a good job at it from the reactions of you idiots.
So that makes overt racism okay?

Jesus Lynne you're as stupid as he is. The two of you sound like children "WELL HE STARTED IT FIRST....."
Giving back what you all dish out seems to do the trick.
Yet not ONE person here has resorted to personal insults based on racism. Nobody has "dished out" ignorant comments about people's race BUT him.

But its not shocking that you're trying to justify it. You'll justify ANYTHING as long as you can suck up to someone you think is on your "side".
So, I don't really have an interest in reading each of his posts, or anyone else's who spends the majoirity of their time here just doing that.
Then perhaps its YOU that should take your OWN advice and "refrain from posting anything if you don't have an answer."

ROFLMAO You idiot.

Of the posts I've seen from him, there wasn't any anti-semitism. If there is, I wondered who it was directed to.
Your issue to deal with if you have a problem with people asking questions in a discussion forum, Toots.
I have no problem with people asking questions "toots", but I DO have a problem with assholes like you who admit you can't be bothered to read the posts, then ask STUPID questions that a simple reading would have answered.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#246982 Jul 3, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, sorry, beg to differ. She's a troll. Was always a troll. Is still a troll. Pretended not to be.
That's one big lie, no better than Lyin Lynne D.
That I know of, she's never NOT claimed to be trolling. IMO, she's a much better person than Lynne D will EVER even hope to be.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#246983 Jul 3, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
What I find mind boggling and stupefying is that one troll is bad and evil, yet the other troll, who plays the exact same bait and report games is A-ok. One poster that lies about who she is and posts under different ids is to be hounded and ridiculed BUT another just like her isn't
Pathetic double standard.
IMHO, There's a big difference between who Rachel is here and who some of these other trolls are. Rachel has a history that includes actual discussion on the topic. I've never seen her bash others based on race or religion or sexual orientation JUST to "get under their skin" as Lynnie says or "because its fun" as that idiot zach says. She, like you and I and many MANY others have gotten personal with others in some nasty ways, but there's some area's we dont tend to go. I've never known her to report anyone, but perhaps she has, I honestly dont know. Personally I think that's a cowards game, and it has a way to come back to bite one in their ass if they abuse it. Look at the Knutbar for example, not even the mods take her stupid ass seriously anymore and she brags about reporting others.

**shrugs** I happen to like her, trolling and all.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

NCAA Basketball Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What role do you think humans play in global wa... 12 min Earthling-1 1,109
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 20 min ChristineM 228,564
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 38 min woodtick57 1,115,130
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 1 hr Trojan 27,589
Should child beauty pageants be banned? 4 hr PieceMaker 342
Conn's Appliances (Nov '07) 17 hr Carol 280
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) Mon El SupremoS 201,038

NCAA Basketball People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE