All quiet on Chicago Bulls front

RKA wrote:

<quoted text>
The Cavs pretty much stole Shaq since all Phoenix wanted was financial relief. Let's see if Shaq can make a difference in the 50 games he'll probably play due to his declining physical ability.

The acquisition of Shaq just ended any shot Cleveland had of winning a title.
Shaq retired last season.

Nada Surf wrote:

<quoted text>The acquisition of Shaq just ended any shot Cleveland had of winning a title.
Shaq retired last season.

Shaq retired after the season he won a ring with Miami.

RKA wrote:

<quoted text>
Chandler wasn't going to make it in Chicago. He and Skiles didn't mess and they weren't ready to get rid of the coach who got them back into the playoffs.

AND Hinrich could not and cannot feed the post. JR Smith almost won 6th man this year, though.

What was more stupid than giving Skiles a long term deal or Wallace one? Or how about some of the runnerups?

Steve wrote:

<quoted text>
Thats great, but they both give up 60 points on the defensive end...so you can keep Hughes and J. Crawford.

Hughes is a good defender. I thought you guys said BG was the one who gave up the big defensive points?

dave wrote:

<quoted text>
And you forget that no one in Chicago wants an **** player who only scores when "in the mood to do so".

You prefer the players that are motivated every nite to score 50, but dont have the length, strength or skill to do so, because that is what you have now in Hinrich, Thomases, BG, Noah, Miller. Probably, also, in Gibson.