McCartney cameo at Joel concert brings fans back
Comments
|
since there was a member of The Beatles and The Who there, because both had played Shea back in the day, how come come Mick Jagger wasn't there, because The Rolling Stones also played Shea back in the day?
Also, did anyone else notice that out of all the special guests Billy had, not one was a female? Christina Aguilera would have been perfect. She is from Staten Island and has a great voice. She could have done an awesome duet with Tony Bennett. |
|
|
Judged:
1
1
1 Hey Debbie Downer: Why wasn't there a full eclipse of the full moon on Friday night, why was it so hot, why, why, why? What a gloomy, negative person you are! Just wondering, why? Why didn't Janis Joplin & Jimi Hendrix play again, why wasn't Billy Graham there, where is the black cat, the Ice Capades, why wasn't The Police, Simon & Garfunkel there, why, why, why?????????? |
|
|
Curious to know who was in the band, if anyone caught the names. Thanks!
|
|
|
"I have felt bonded to him," Rosen said. "Even my husband has known about my connection with him."
LMAO...yes...that is some deep bond...I'm sure Paul is well aware of it and intends to seek you out any day now... Dolt!!! |
|
Yes, I sat there writting down the names of the band...oy... I will say though...there was a very talented colored woman...she did it all. |
|
Nice to see you Greg. |
|
|
Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Comments: 1102
Allentown
ISP Location:
Easton, PA
|
Judged:
2
2
1 |
|
“PRESS TO PLAY”
Joined: Dec 19, 2006
Comments: 11059
TELL ME TO PRESS
ISP Location:
United States
|
Sorry, but your wrong. First off, they stopped touring in 1966, and for the fact that the group wanted to spend more time in the studio, creating masterpieces. Dylan and the Byrds were great too. |
|
It wasn't for the Beatles to blame. They began writing "meaningful" stuff in 1965. When they had matured(John 25, Paul 23). And, progressing in song writing they became greater than the others. So why overrated man? If you search carefully and logically you'll find out. But, I gather you are a Beatles' hater. There's a patrol in this Forum. Look out.
|
|
|
“PRESS TO PLAY”
Joined: Dec 19, 2006
Comments: 11059
TELL ME TO PRESS
ISP Location:
Wilkesboro, NC
|
Dylan and the Byrds were innovators just like the Beatles, it really doesn't matter anyone's age, the Beatles paved the way for folk rock, right along with the Byrds and Dylan.
Hi Greg, your so right about 1965 being the start of their mature period. |
|
Hi awc and Greg, The byrds and Dylan were great but they didn't match what the Beatles created. Nothing meaningless about the Bealtes.
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Comments: 1102
Allentown
ISP Location:
Easton, PA
|
Judged:
1 Debatable. Actually, Arthur Lee and Love were better than all of them. The greates band ever and the most underappreciated! Forever Changes blows St. Peppers away! |
|
“PRESS TO PLAY”
Joined: Dec 19, 2006
Comments: 11059
TELL ME TO PRESS
ISP Location:
Whittier, CA
|
Not debatable at all. Love MAY have had a few good songs, but that's it. They are nowhere on the same level as The Beatles, and Love gets all the appreciation that it deserves. The BEATLES rule. fact, not opinion. :) |
It's great, I agree; However, claiming that Love(the group) were better or "Forever Changes" was better, man! No way. Love had one album and a couple of songs. The Beatles? You have attend Beatles' classes. |
|
|
You have attend Beatles' classes.
Sorry, typos you have TO attend. |
|
|
“PRESS TO PLAY”
Joined: Dec 19, 2006
Comments: 11059
TELL ME TO PRESS
ISP Location:
Wilkesboro, NC
|
So right my friend. Love was good, but nowhere near the Beatles. Not to knock Love, but it's the truth as you said Greg. Beatle's classes meet every tuesday and Thursday at 8pm, lol. |
|
Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Comments: 1102
Allentown
ISP Location:
Easton, PA
|
Love made 4 albums. Forever Changes was the best but the others were also good. If there were Beatles classes Im afraid that I would fall asleep. |
"Love", "Da Capo", "Forever Changes" are the ones that I have; I never said that I don't like them. On the contrary, Arthur Lee was one of the greatest song writers I can think of. Comparing to the Beatles, I'm afraid that are very much behind them; Allright then, don't come to classes if you don't want to. You can love the...Love, but don't compare them to the Beatles. It's inaproppriate. Doesn't match. Beatles have...more, don't you get it? I don't care if you don't like them, it's your musical tastes, I respect them. But, please, don't you go on posting bad things about the Beatles, at least not here. |
|
|
“PRESS TO PLAY”
Joined: Dec 19, 2006
Comments: 11059
TELL ME TO PRESS
ISP Location:
United States
|
That's because the Beatles are over your head. You can't appreciate good music, your loss. |
|
“PRESS TO PLAY”
Joined: Dec 19, 2006
Comments: 11059
TELL ME TO PRESS
ISP Location:
United States
|
It's no use trying to explain it to him Greg, he is very closed minded, shame. |
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Girls With The Band | 9 min | Fun Loving | 6 |
| Rod Stewart will sing his hits at Jones Beach | 19 min | mms | 1 |
| DMB saxophonist dies | 32 min | radical mode... | 12 |
| Dave Matthews Band saxophonist dies | 37 min | DMB | 4 |
| How N.W.A made a rap believer of one nervous cr... | 2 hr | skratchy wil... | 1 |
| Counting Crows Emotional, Maroon 5 Slick | 3 hr | Reality | 4 |
| Pop icons at 50: Michael Jackson | 4 hr | Wacko sux | 12 |

