Rihanna's racist hotel encounter

Pat Robertson s Payday wrote:

<quoted text>
That's right, drunk, you can maintain whatever bigotries you wish in your besotted brain and in your home and in your house of worship of hate.
You cannot discriminate in places of public accommodation on the basis of race in the US or in the EU.(Nor on the basis of certain other factors, depending on the locale and the group characteristic.)
But you understood this and you are just twisting things around in your fits of misogyny and apparent DTs.

where was the discrimination PERRY ...where she stayed there yes , name calling but big deal you do it and you don't even have a clue

love your path to forever as in uneducated

psssssssssssssssssssst don't look under the tree you have not been a good girl

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
actually the word bigot isn't really in use here: but by GENO , the word was a [racist ].... now that is greater evil .. because a racist is one race superior to another ...belief
have a good day
hell to continue , he drifted way off the path here , she twittered racist comments , there is no denial of services etc etc ,
now have a good holiday season to you and yours

I am not a bigot!! I said I am a big idiot!

At the end of the day she is what she is and she cant change that. Lol

-Kevin- wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't pick or choose who's a bigot and who isn't. You're being a bigot.

No moron, I'm not a bigot for calling the KKK a bunch of redneck racists. Same for talibangelical homophobes.

You homophobes love your sexually disordered discrimination so much and are in so much clinical denial that you can't tell fact from fiction.

I'll be a bigot when I try for laws barring simpleton Christianists from marrying, adopting, serving openly and all the rest.

tallyho wrote:

<quoted text>
where was the discrimination PERRY ...where she stayed there yes , name calling but big deal you do it and you don't even have a clue
love your path to forever as in uneducated
psssssssssssssssssssst don't look under the tree you have not been a good girl

It is much easier to punish hate speech in the EU, because they define it much more broadly than we do, and they don't have a First Amendment. Both civilly and criminally. I hope she sues.

the Magna Carta .......

ARTICLE: FREEDOM OF SPEECH

The ability to speak our mind is a key freedom that distinguishes British citizens from those in countries which are tyrannies. In modern Britain, this freedom is slowly being eaten away. Often the motive is virtuous - for example part of anti-terror legislation or to prevent racism. Nevertheless, free speech is under threat as it has not been for hundreds of years.

The reality is that political correctness, though well-intentioned, is turning into a totalitarian monster that can censor any debate and distort argument about burning issues such as mass immigration and multi-culturalism.

as I recall England is considered European..

but as the learned counselor states ... laws of bigotry but the violation was racial remarks ....

not discrimination

now since there is only one US constitution.. but of course other countries don't have a 1st amendment defining freedom of speech

solution you want to try a case be in the right court

INTERESTING:

from the French version of the constitution...
The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 19 of the ICCPR states that "[e]veryone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice". Article 19 goes on to say that the exercise of these rights carries "special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to certain restrictions" when necessary "[f]or respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "[f]or the protection of national security or of public order (order public), or of public health or morals".

Marcus Bachmann s Poke wrote:

<quoted text>
No moron, I'm not a bigot for calling the KKK a bunch of redneck racists. Same for talibangelical homophobes.
You homophobes love your sexually disordered discrimination so much and are in so much clinical denial that you can't tell fact from fiction.
I'll be a bigot when I try for laws barring simpleton Christianists from marrying, adopting, serving openly and all the rest.

Ok Bigot :-)

Mother Theresas Ghost wrote:

<quoted text>
Who the heck is this "Rihanna" person? Is she important? If so, why? What has she done humanitarily that should garner the respect of other people?

Word!!!

She helped stimulate the economy with increased umbrella sales.

kid gloves wrote:

Funny how her bodyguards and her entourage didn't say a word to the racist.

Yeah, they could have really messed his face up. Besides racists live only in the USA right?

Ol Saint Nick wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, they could have really messed his face up. Besides racists live only in the USA right?

And then only in Florida I understand.

tallyho wrote:

INTERESTING:
from the French version of the constitution...

Hey wiki plagiarizing drunk-alike, the EU has very severe hate speech laws. Your unattributed quotes have nothing to do with the situation, as you know - when sober - because the EU does not consider hate speech to be speech at all.

That's why you can't wear a swastika in Germany, for example. It's not speech there, unlike here.

Marcus Bachmann s Poke wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey wiki plagiarizing drunk-alike, the EU has very severe hate speech laws. Your unattributed quotes have nothing to do with the situation, as you know - when sober - because the EU does not consider hate speech to be speech at all.
That's why you can't wear a swastika in Germany, for example. It's not speech there, unlike here.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaah your stupidity ........

why does "fat chance" and "slim chance" mean the same?

Plagiarism is taking the writings or literary ideas of another and selling and/or publishing them as one's own writing.

Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.

Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.

Freedom of Speech is more than legal in Portugal. Freedom of Speech is part of the Portuguese Constitution. This fact is important since any Law that is made or approved in Portugal have to obey the Constitution of the country, thus the Freedom of Speech privilege is above any other interest and is one of the unchangeable pillars of Portugal.

There is no freedom of speech of Topix however. It's a privately owned corporation that does remove posts it doesn't approve of.

tallyho wrote:

Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.
Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.

Hey drunk-alike, your repeated postings of wiki's materials are neither cited by you nor brief. They run to paragraphs in each post of yours.

There is no question that the EU has hate speech laws, as does Canada. We know, because US conservatives whined about our hate crimes laws as (in the addled, right wing minds) paving the way for similar hate speech laws here.

You're a liar and a bigot.

Marcus Bachmann s Poke wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey drunk-alike, your repeated postings of wiki's materials are neither cited by you nor brief. They run to paragraphs in each post of yours.
There is no question that the EU has hate speech laws, as does Canada. We know, because US conservatives whined about our hate crimes laws as (in the addled, right wing minds) paving the way for similar hate speech laws here.
You're a liar and a bigot.

read again simp... just a re-buff to your joke of a post ......

Paragraph , a distinct portion of written or printed matter dealing with a particular idea

Plagiarism is taking the writings or literary ideas of another and selling and/or publishing them as one's own writing.

Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.

Brief quotes or use of cited sources do not constitute plagiarism.

literary ideas .......Paragraph , a distinct portion of written or printed matter dealing Paragraph , a distinct portion of written or printed matter dealing with a particular idea

a particular idea.....literary ideas .

THANK YOU, YOU ARE A GEM......

Marcus Bachmann s Poke wrote:

You're a liar and a bigot.

This reminds me of a Instant msg log I saw the other day.

It went something like this.

<Pot> Hey Kettle! What's up?
<Kettle> Hey Pot!! Just sitting around. You?
<Pot> You're BLACK!!!
<Kettle> OMG!! no waah. U R!