Comments
|
The REALLY ugly thing is that federal officers have already
been told that a U.S. aircraft carrier is a sitting duck almost anywhere in the Persian Gulf, because Iran is bristling with Mach 2.9 "Super Sunburn" SS-N-26 Russian-made cruise missiles. Even without a nuclear warhead, the kinetic energy at nearly 2,000 miles per hour is enormous: E = 1/2 mv**2 or 16 TIMES the kinetic energy of the same missile at 500 mph. Although the Aegis defense system is designed to prevent a single cruise missile from hitting the carrier, there is a very real question about its prospects against a coordinated barrage of these cruise missiles. Specifically, if the "island" control tower suffers a direct hit and/or if the flight deck is damaged enough to prevent all aircraft operations, those aircraft already in the air would need to land elsewhere, e.g. UAE, and the aircraft on-board would be unable to launch if not also damaged, destroyed or disabled. In the face of these realistic tactical considerations, it is reasonable to ask why the Navy would be ordered to station a U.S. carrier anywhere in the Persian Gulf, given the international tension that already exists in that part of the world, and given the extensive quantity and sophistication of military hardware which Iran has purchased from Russia and deployed along Iran's western shore with the Persian Gulf. Thus, with foreknowledge of all the above, it is also reasonable to ask if the Bush administration intends to "sacrifice" a carrier, in order to rally public opinion in favor of a massive bombing attack on Iran. Given as desperate as the administration has become, and with its time inside the White House rapidly running out, the above scenario is certainly within the realm of possibility. What would the Pentagon recommend if Iran stationed a fully equipped aircraft carrier about 100 miles off-shore of New York City? Why the U.S. Navy doesn't see this coming is anybody's guess, as of today. Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Ray Earnest <eraye@hughes.net> wrote: We need to get this out to every list available. Bush and company will do anything to go to war with Iran. When the carrier is sunk we know where to go, with manila hemp, to avenge these thousands of sailors. Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: Henri the Celt |
||||
|
Bullsh*t
|
||||
|
from the "We Told You So" Department
of Military Madness Unlimited ... http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20070323/pl... Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Private Attorney General |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 'Birthers' Lose Again as Federal Judge Nixes Ch... | 44 min | 2003emm3 | 895 |
| Don’t Forget the Jap Killings | 3 hr | JJFADS | 10 |
| We Remember Pearl Harbor | 7 hr | nopez | 42 |
| Honoring America's veterans | 8 hr | Ryan Hubbard | 49 |
| Statue of USS Indianapolis survivor is unveiled | 14 hr | Jim Belcher Jr | 1 |
| SEALs accused of hitting alleged Iraq plotter | Wed | storm warning | 433 |
| HSM-71 is a nightmare squadron? | Tue | Sloppy secon... | 9 |