Militias and the GOP

Voting for McCain was better than voting for Omama.

If you vote for turd #1 or turd #2, you still get a turd. McCain would have been worse because he would not have had most of the country immediately hating and fearing him. No, the correct guy was appointed by the rigged election system. Someone who will be so vile and leave such a bad taste in our mouths that we just might accidentally elect a real statesman next time instead of turd #1 or turd #2. They cannot rig an election if the people's choice is obvious. With Obamination and McDogmeat, the people were too closely split and the fix was easy.

GPM wrote:

<quoted text>Not as deep as the crap you are shoveling and trying to convince us that it is rose petals.
I have tried to respond to your posts with factual responses. You have repeatedly replied with drivel and ad hominem attacks. This is the last time I will reply to you

You're comparing yourself to slaves because a politician that you don't like got elected. I can't imagine how you'd expect to have your lunatic ravings taken seriously, honestly.

No PFG, It is because the politicians of both parties have been systematically destroying the barriers that were supposed to keep government out of our private lives and let people be. They began with the welfare state and are ramping it up with Universal Health Care, which will not bring free wonder-med to all but bring us all down to insanely expensive and rationed Red Cross Jungle Clinic medicine instead. The penalties for not doing what the feds tell us to do are why I say that we are slaves.

You say that you are free. I say that if you are required to spend $1,200 per month (according to the CBO news release about PelosiCare version of ObamaCare last week) insurance and if you do not have it, you can be fined thousands of dollars and put into prison for years.

Were is the freedom? The freedom to do what you are told or be punished? You have a twisted view of freedom. An, dare I say, un-American view of freedom. You are more inline with the East German, Soviet or Chinese version of freedom.

I rail against all politicians who promise the world then ignore their voters once ensconced in office. At least until the next election takes them back to the dirty little people who have to be chuckled along to get their betters bad in DC for another term.

Both sides are destroying Amerika.

I vote for the most pro-gun politician who has the best chance of being elected.

Tory II wrote:

Both sides are destroying Amerika.
I vote for the most pro-gun politician who has the best chance of being elected.

Single issue voting is a hell of a lot simpler than nuance and reason, that's for sure. Sounds like you're managing to sidestep any real thinking, altogether.

PFG wrote:

<quoted text>
Single issue voting is a hell of a lot simpler than nuance and reason, that's for sure. Sounds like you're managing to sidestep any real thinking, altogether.

I'm really thinkng you sound like you're a control freak, left-wing, socialist Nazi.

Tory II wrote:

left-wing, socialist Nazi.

Your perspective and political awareness are wrapped up pretty well, with this comment.

Tory II wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm really thinkng you sound like you're a control freak, left-wing, socialist Nazi.

I think that you nailed PFG perfectly with your assessment.

Of course, PFG will come back with something on par with "I know you are but what am I?" Typical looser Lie-beral. When they can't counter an argument with facts they fall back on ad hominem attacks and other diversions.

GPM wrote:

<quoted text>I think that you nailed PFG perfectly with your assessment.
Of course, PFG will come back with something on par with "I know you are but what am I?" Typical looser Lie-beral. When they can't counter an argument with facts they fall back on ad hominem attacks and other diversions.

Not really. I'm aware that the notion of a "left wing socialist Nazi" is absurd. Hell, anybody that's ever passed a high school civics class should be able to figure out the problem with that.

Not knowing what the hell you're talking about has never stopped you guys, though, has it?

The term Nazi is derived from the first two syllables of Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, the official German language name of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Note the word "Socialist. While they did lean Right in many ways, they also leaned Left in other ways. A Left-Wing Nazi is not too much of a stretch. It boils down to someone who wants the government to run everything and people own nothing. That is very similar to Communism but with a Fascist touch.

It should be an easy concept to understand. At least for anyone who wasn't stoned all through High School. So, go on and prattle away. You provide a lot of comic relief in otherwise serious topics.

A Nazi wants everyone to surrender their individual freedoms for the benefit of the common good. The label may be profane to some, but it's an accurate description of some peoples' political values.

A socialist is a close cousin to a liberal. An antigun socialist is a Nazi, because Hitler, a famous Nazi and socialist, banned the Jews from having guns and then he murdered millions of them.

Bad things happen after govt has enough power to ban people from having guns. Many republicans are antigun.

Both sides are destroying Amerika.

GPM wrote:

The term Nazi is derived from the first two syllables of Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, the official German language name of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Note the word "Socialist. While they did lean Right in many ways, they also leaned Left in other ways. A Left-Wing Nazi is not too much of a stretch. It boils down to someone who wants the government to run everything and people own nothing. That is very similar to Communism but with a Fascist touch.
It should be an easy concept to understand. At least for anyone who wasn't stoned all through High School. So, go on and prattle away. You provide a lot of comic relief in otherwise serious topics.

Ah, the old "Socialist was in the name of their party!" chestnut. The Nazi's were not socialists, despite the manipulative use of the word. They were fascists. Fascism is an extreme right-wing philosophy.

Socialism and communism aren't the same thing, either, but that may be a little too much for you, if you can't distinguish between socialism and fascism.

You're just throwing around a bunch of hysterical boogey-man invoking lingo. Go on calling people commie-nazi's, though; it makes it quicker and easier to identify you as an idiot.

Tory II wrote:

A Nazi wants everyone to surrender their individual freedoms for the benefit of the common good. The label may be profane to some, but it's an accurate description of some peoples' political values.
A socialist is a close cousin to a liberal. An antigun socialist is a Nazi, because Hitler, a famous Nazi and socialist, banned the Jews from having guns and then he murdered millions of them.
Bad things happen after govt has enough power to ban people from having guns. Many republicans are antigun.
Both sides are destroying Amerika.

There's a little more to political ideology than guns. Of course, that's your pet issue, so you'll look at everything through that lens.

Your definition of "nazi's" is great, though; did you make that up yourself, or are you parroting some other simpleton's words?

PFG says "Blah, blah, blah. You're wrong! Blah, blah, blah."

Oh well. I've been told now!:lol:

I had this really long post almost completely written when it occurred to me that I am totally wasting my time arguing with you. So I deleted it and wrote this instead. I'm done with you. Believe what ever you wish. Enjoy your life. I need to enjoy mine.

Damn, that's disappointing. I was looking forward to being called a Satanic Christian, or something else like that. Surely "left-wing Nazi" can't be the only ridiculous oxymoron you've got up your sleeve, can it?

Tory II wrote:

Both sides are destroying Amerika.
I vote for the most pro-gun politician who has the best chance of being elected.

And you are not alone. I, too, am a one issue voter.

Me too. I figure that if a politician does not trust his/her constituency with our rights, why should I trust him/her with mine?

Militias are going to save you're arses when the government tries to put us in camps.