|
Since: Aug 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Yeah wrote: <quoted text>And that's what trial will determine son. Besides, we already KNOW he lied to the judge! Oh I see, so Zimmerman is guilty of murder because he lied about his finances. But the French told the truth about WMDS even though they lied about their illegal enrichment from oil for food? Its just all who you decide to believe, isn't it?
|
|
GW Baffoon
Palo Alto, CA
|
Whos You Daddy wrote: <quoted text> You English is atrocious. And you statement is bull$h!t! Perhaps I should have said blow it out you fat old geriatric a$$crack. So your press eh? Press what? Press you panties Press you suit? LOL. Still don't understand the use of the word: "your", I see. You're presiduncial material, son. I can tell by your (see... that's how you use the word) ability to mis-comprehend things. To help you develop comprehension skills, I've posted a link to the first chapter of my book, Decision Points.... enjoy! http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
|
|
Ascendo Tuum
Palo Alto, CA
|
You Will Be Assimilated wrote: <quoted text> Oh that's just brilliant. I think I go stroke my pud now. well... at least you found an activity that you're good at... but you only have to satisfy yourself... so I assume the bar is set pretty low.
|
|
“FEED THE DEAD FETUS”
Since: Jan 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
TonyT1961 wrote: <quoted text> I would like your source to these quotes, but I will say there was never any dispute whatsoever that Saddam had biological and chemical weapons - he used them against his own people. But the only thing in dispute is the fact that no WMDs were ever found. Bush even admitted this in the interview below conducted in 2004; http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp... German officials had informant code named "Curveball" who supplied WMD story - although German authorities warned Rumsfeld and Bush that this source was unreliable, the war in Iraq ensued based on false intelligence - Curveball had since confessed his information was fabricated; http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/15/d... So yes, the entire Congress was in fact lied to by the Bush Administration. And the American people. And you wonder why Bush left with the lowest approval by any president - 22$/ and Cheney with 13%. Where did 20 million in shrink wrapped bills sent to Iraq dissappear to? Ever question that? Bush lied to them in 1998?-1999?-2000-? Really? Racist FK!
|
|
“FEED THE DEAD FETUS”
Since: Jan 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
zazz wrote: <quoted text> <quoted text> <quoted text> Once again you change the subject. Show me where I said they were liars. You love to lie about other people's posts. <quoted text> You called Bush a liar. If Bush lied, so did the demockskrs. Ixnay on the upidstay!! :~)
|
|
Ascendo Tuum
Palo Alto, CA
|
downhill246 wrote: <quoted text> Actually there were WMDs in Iraq at least according to WikiLeaks and a former Seal Team Six leader. Documents discovered in 2003 indicated that Iraq stockpiled 21,000 chemical warheads following the Iran-Iraq war, and during the period of UN sanctions.......... Since 2004, Al Qaeda has carried out at least one hundred chemical attacks on coalition forces in Iraq. Most attacks used "repurposed' chemical warheads from Saddam's arsenal- nerve gas and mustard gas. If one believes the WikiLeaks trove, it confirms that Al Qaeda is in possession of chemical weapons and they have been used against US troops in both Iraq and Afghanistan....The "no WMDs in Iraq" myth has been allowed to persist because the truth is more disturbing. Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, U.S and coalition forces have located and destroyed more than 500 chemcal weapons. Most of these have been 155 mm artillery shells. Most contained varieties of the vesicant HD,mustard gas. VX, sarin, tabun, cyclosarin, including advanced binary weapons ,chemical aircraft bombs, mortar projectiles, sprayers,and bulk produced agent have also been recovered and destroyed." Chuck Pfarrar, former assault element leader of Seal Team 6, author of Seal Target Geromino, The Inside Story Of The Mission To Kill Osama Bin Laden( 2011) p139,141 heh heh heh! Those supposed WMDs were built by Saddam under the watchful eye of the american government. Bush administration provided the raw materials, supplied the technology, over saw production and had observers present during testing. Remember that photo of ole Rumsbucket shaking hands with Saddam; smiling like a cheshire cat (Dec 20, 1983)??!! But guess what, dipsh!t... chemical weapons have a shelf life.. AND THEY WERE LONG LONG EXPIRED BEFORE THEY WERE FOUND - THEY WERE ABSOLUTELY USELESS.
|
|
GW Baffoon
Palo Alto, CA
|
Freebird USA wrote: <quoted text> Irrelevant,just like you. The point is your willingness to place trust in the French who were in charge whose dishonesty was PROVEN in the oil for ood scandal. As usual you're just a leftwing talking points gasbag. ya... those damned French... dishonsety belongs to MY mis-administration. How DARE those Frenchies meddle in MY territory. Oh... can you pass the freedom fries??
|
|
Yeah
Waipahu, HI
|
Freebird USA wrote: <quoted text> I agree you continue to be very sad. lol! Yes son. I do feel sorry for you.
|
|
|
|
“Why Is the Right Deranged?”
Since: May 09
Lake Success, N.Y.
|
Please wait...
BRONACH wrote: <quoted text> Bush lied to them in 1998?-1999?-2000-? Really? Racist FK! Was Bush presidnt in 1998,1999, or 2000 you fcuking fool? Did I say that? Pissed you got slapped by Bush's own words? Useless.
|
|
Yeah
Waipahu, HI
|
Freebird USA wrote: <quoted text> Oh I see, so Zimmerman is guilty of murder because he lied about his finances. But the French told the truth about WMDS even though they lied about their illegal enrichment from oil for food? Its just all who you decide to believe, isn't it? lol! Really? I wouldn't have made such a connection. Apparently now his supporters feel lying to judge equates to being guilty of murder. Things don't work like that in my country, son. And the French DID tell the truth about wmds. History supports that fact. Unlike you who has NONE son!
|
|
Since: Aug 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
GW Baffoon wrote: <quoted text> ya... those damned French... dishonsety belongs to MY mis-administration. How DARE those Frenchies meddle in MY territory. Oh... can you pass the freedom fries?? You guys must have majored in irrelevance
|
|
Ascendo Tuum
Palo Alto, CA
|
mr right ness wrote: <quoted text> How's scumbag racist thief Martin doing? Probably in heaven, eh, Doucher? Interesting you place Trayvon in heaven.... I guess God knows the real truth, eh?? By logical extension, that place GI Jane in hell after the fish fry.
|
|
Yeah
Waipahu, HI
|
BRONACH wrote: <quoted text> You called Bush a liar. If Bush lied, so did the demockskrs. Ixnay on the upidstay!! :~) lol! Bush lied. History proves it. Still haven't figured out who the Commander in Chief of the US military is have you son? What country did you say you're a citizen of?
|
|
Ascendo Tuum
Palo Alto, CA
|
mr right ness wrote: <quoted text> 2 lying idiots, between the 3 of you you could reform the 3 stooges. yep... a top notch forensic audio expert's analysis showing the screaming voice on the 911 call was NOT GI Jane, must be a liar. Try again dipsh!t.
|
|
“FEED THE DEAD FETUS”
Since: Jan 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
TonyT1961 wrote: <quoted text> Was Bush presidnt in 1998,1999, or 2000 you fcuking fool? Did I say that? Pissed you got slapped by Bush's own words? Useless. HGey CK SKR. That is the point. It wasn't a lie in 1998? Bush wasn't President. It wasn't a lie in1999? Bush wasn't President. It wasn't a lie in 2000? Bush wasn't President. But it became a lie in 2001? REALLY??? GFY! :~)
|
|
Yeah
Waipahu, HI
|
Freebird USA wrote: <quoted text> You guys must have majored in irrelevance Yes, bushie thought the same thing too. That's why those 4,300+ American soldier deaths and the trillions he spent there is considered irrelevant by cons son. Essentially, you consider them worthless.
|
|
Ascendo Tuum
Palo Alto, CA
|
downhill246 wrote: <quoted text> Well the state hasn't proven its case and your opinion is just one of millions. Victim Zimmerman is free and alive. heh heh heh! I doubt the state would be interested in proving it's case in the media, dipsh!t... wait for the trial.. that's where things tend to get "proven".(Take a CIVICS 101 course, moron!)
|
|
Since: Aug 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
Yeah wrote: <quoted text>lol! Really? I wouldn't have made such a connection. Apparently now his supporters feel lying to judge equates to being guilty of murder. Things don't work like that in my country, son. And the French DID tell the truth about wmds. History supports that fact. Unlike you who has NONE son! You are incredibly DISHONEST or willing IGNORANT. You IGNORE what you can't explain and manufacture the rest. History CONFIRMS the French were violating the limits of the oil for food program for profit. That is FACT. But you still believed they were truthful about WMDs? Hindsight is 20-20. As I stated earlier you are intellectually dishonest.Yours is an opinion of convenience based on ideolgy or stupidity. All you offer is hindsight.
|
|
Since: Aug 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Yeah wrote: <quoted text>Yes, bushie thought the same thing too. That's why those 4,300+ American soldier deaths and the trillions he spent there is considered irrelevant by cons son. Essentially, you consider them worthless. Oh you just CARE so much more than I do,I don't think I can stand it you smarmy self important douche.
|
|
Ascendo Tuum
Palo Alto, CA
|
downhill246 wrote: <quoted text> They can't swear it was Martin begging for help because they were not eyewitnesses to the begging,only ear witnesses, and they never heard Martin beg for help before so how would they know it was him and not George? Next witness. Heh heh heh! You keep wanting to avoid the truth, don't you, dipsh!t?? Tests on the 911 tape, by Tom Owens (a forensic audio expert and... get this... CHAIR EMERITUS for the American Board of Recorded Evidence... that alone kind of proves his status as an expert) has concluded that after extensive analysis ... THE VOICE ON THE TAPE IS NOT THAT OF GI JANE aka Georgie Porgie Zimmerman. Another expert analysis using a different technique, commissioned the Orlando Sentinal, came to the SAME CONCLUSION. So... if it wasn't GI Jane screaming on the tape (proven - twice), then I wonder who it was?? Use your limited power of deduction, and tell me, ok??
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|