Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit?

Judged:

1

1

1

Henry Lee wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not a valid source. So I will reject that. Nice try!
Anyway, In the article, it looks like MJ did not rip off anyone. There were no proofs of the ripoff.
It just says the court sided with the promoter.
Understand?

Judged:

2

1

1

InDaHouse wrote:

<quoted text>
But Henry, the jury said they thought he was guilty, just not of the charges he was in court for. This assertion of yours is just as hilarious as your one about an insurance company paying money out to avoid a molestation trial.
*smirk*

Judged:

2

2

1

justmyopinion129 wrote:

<quoted text>
umm Henry correct me if I'm wrong but if their was reasonable doubt then that means that it was not proven correct?
Which means.... right thats why he was ACQUITTED?
dmb, dumb, dumb

Judged:

2

2

2

Lisa wrote:

Henry Lee pedo f'loon of course
justmyopinion129 -ghetto f'loon
mpgstl -damaged f'loon

Judged:

1

1

1

InDaHouse wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe it was when he invited boys to his bed?

Judged:

2

2

1

KBTs wrote:

<quoted text>
Henry posts the same posts every day or two. He's been doing it for over a month now. You also have to know what you're looking for in the documents. You can say practically anyting in the pleadings, you don't have to prove anything or even be truthful - you are free to pretty much say anything you want. That only changes when the witness takes the oath.
Henry posts crap and expects us to believe it. He wants us to prove our statements to him while he sits back and ducks and weaves like a pro boxer.
And of course there's always the 'don't like it? tough' response too.

Judged:

2

2

2

Angel wrote:

Henry I adore you for next reason :):
Ladies and Gentlemen...attention please !!!!!!!
Henry has just admitted that there is a INCREDIBLY GREAT possibility that marriage of Michael and Debbie was FAKE.And even he did it accidentally by saying next:
"My classmate's parents are divorced after finding out that her dad is GAY and is not attracted to women. He only married so that his parents will not think he's gay. There are many cases like this."
So Henry wanted to tell us just like parents of his friend covered up that the dad was gay,in the same way Michael covered up (with Debbie) what we all know.
Henry has shot himself in the foot,as usually :)
Cheers Henry!:)

Judged:

1

1

1

Angel wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you crazy ?
So since not everyone is attracted who has sex,in your opinion,you can also can have sex with an animal since attraction doesn't matter,right Henry?...LOL !!!!!!!!!!
This is a new moment for me in Henry's case.
lol

Judged:

1

1

1

InDaHouse wrote:

<quoted text>
Gee Henry, I would say you are being racist, but as you seem to be from a non-white (and non English speaking) background yourself I will have to assume you are just trying to get a rise out of me. Sorry Henry, you'll have to try some other way to get me angry.
*smirk*

Judged:

1

Henry Lee wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrong again.
Michael did not invite the boys.
The accuser and his family even admitted in court that the boy begged Michael if he can sleep in his room.
You already know this. I've mentioned this hundred times with the court document.

Judged:

1

1

1

justmyopinion129 wrote:

<quoted text>
The charges he was in court for in 2005 when he was acquitted of all the charges:
- 4 counts of lewd conduct with a child younger than 14 (this is child molestation in case you were confused)
- 4 counts of administering alcohol to facilitate child molestation
- 1 count of attempter lewd conduct with a child younger than 14 (attempted child molestation)
- 1 count of conspiracy to commit child abduction or false imprisonment
This is what he was in court for... so if the jury said (which they didn't but just for the sake of your stupid argument they did) that they thought he was guilty just on the charges he was in court for then THEY DIDN'T THINK HE MOLESTED THOSE CHILDREN!!
Mind you they came to this conclusion after a 14 week trial and testimony from 140 witnesses between the prosecution and defense teams.
So you just proved us right... Thank you again...
HE WAS NOT GUILTY!

Judged:

1

KBTs wrote:

<quoted text>
I am ashamed truly I am. I thought there were supposed to be sandwiches here tonight.
So when was the election held that elevated you to the role of spokesperson for those millions of fans? Who was second on the ballot? Were there any write ins?
I have to admit you are right. A debate is an exchange of factual information. I can't fault you on that. It's too bad nothing you've written so far falls into that category isn't it?
You should be ashamed too. Now leave this place and check on those sandwiches will you? Some pickles would also be a nice touch.

uh huh wrote:

there's still no proof of that. how can you prove it?? were you there?? did you see him with the boys?? and even if he was not guilty of being a molester, how do you know he wasn't a pedophile??
don't give up yet, i won't know what to read while drinking my morning coffee.:P

justmyopinion129 wrote:

<quoted text>
Re-read what you just said:
1. I am waiting for a photo of Michael's secret girlfriend from you
hmmm i'll give u a minute to think about this...
1..2...3...4...5...6...7...
you ready now?
How is Henry supposed to provide you with a picture of her IF IT WAS A F*CKIN SECRET???
You know celebrities do have private lives... it is unnecessary for us to know every detail and have photos of everyone in their life...
Maybe MJ hid it because people like you chastised him and judged him all time... people like you are what tore him into shreds... without proof of anything...
like i said to a couple other people in here... I hope one day you are falsely accused of a crime... let me clarify... I hope one day you are falsely accused of a crime like child molestation from some kid that you gave a hug to or a kiss on the cheek... and I hope reporters follow you around during the whole process and then you are acquitted.... No one will ever look at you the same... EVER...
Remember what you say in here cause Karma is a b*tch and will bite you in the arse when you least expect it

Angel wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you my guardian angel?
:)

Judged:

1

InDaHouse wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh boy Henry, you are hilarious! The BBC is not reliable? Too funny!
PS - I note you couldn't comprehend the article -*smirk*

InDaHouse wrote:

<quoted text>
That's exactly what happened, so what does that make you? Not real bright, are you?

justmyopinion129 wrote:

<quoted text>
YOU may be attracted to everyone that you have sex with but you don't HAVE to be attracted to someone that you have sex with...
Drunk people have random sex sometimes and aren't attracted to the person....
there's also something called one night stands (usually involving liquor)
I mean haven't you ever heard stories of people especially in college that were drunk and had sex and woke up the next day not remembering and turning their head and seeing someone they WERE NOT ATTRACTED to?
And people pay prostitutes... do u think everyone that pays prostitutes searches for one they are attracted to? lmao lmao lmao
You really are dumb.... and you are sounding more like LISA as the days go on

Judged:

1

justmyopinion129 wrote:

<quoted text>

Drunk people have random sex sometimes and aren't attracted to the person....

InDaHouse wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe it was when he invited boys to his bed?
Or when he built a whole estate to attract boys, not women?
Perhaps it is the thousands of pics of him with young boys, and not women?
Perhaps it was the quality of the two women he married?
Or maybe it is because he wasn't involved in the conception of his children?
Possibly it's the multiple accusations of boy molesting?
Maybe it's the gay porn they found in his bedroom?
Perhaps it's because no women have come forward and said the were his lover?
Just maybe it's the 300 nights he slept with Brett Barnes?
Or the 30 nights he slept over at Jordy Chandler's house?
How about the boys he took away on tour with him?
Should I go on?