Obama bypasses Congress on DREAM Act, stops deporting young illegals

Judged:

1

1

1

Don-N-Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>
Personally I'm not of the opinion that the best way to address law breakers - is to turn into law breakers ourselves...
But that might just be me ~

MissyM wrote:

I'm with Vet,,,down with all laws,,you might be profiling, discriminating, you know. I am short,,,next time I get a speeding ticket I am going to say the police are being mean because I am old and short.

Judged:

1

1

1

Vet wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree, but if we aren't going to enforce all laws, why do we enforce any laws, you can't pick and choose, unless you are Obama and Holder.

Judged:

1

Don-N-Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>
Some people follow the laws because they feel compelled to follow the laws or because they fear the punishment of breaking the law...
Then there are those who follow the law because they just consider it the 'right thing to do'.
I suppose you could count me among the latter.
I don't consider myself "picking and choosing", I just consider it doing the right thing.

Judged:

1

1

Vet wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, Don, I don't know how to be any clearer about this, Obama and Holder are picking and choosing which laws they will enforce and which they will ignore. Which laws do we get to ignore? You may choose to obey all laws but this administration is picking and choosing.

Judged:

2

1

1

Vet wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, Don, I don't know how to be any clearer about this, Obama and Holder are picking and choosing which laws they will enforce and which they will ignore. Which laws do we get to ignore? You may choose to obey all laws but this administration is picking and choosing.

Kramers Attorney wrote:

<quoted text>How do you think Harry Reid was reelected in 2010? The casino unions had their illegal kitchen and housekeeping staffs voting for him.
http://www.lasvegastribune.com/index.php...

Judged:

3

2

2

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>And, he can do that - legally. It's not the "right way", and I don't have to be happy about it, but I suppose this is an example of how this President has decided he'll do a work-around to a gridlocked do nothing Congress. You do realize that he is doing what he can to keep the promises he made when he was elected?
I was NEVER a fan of his immigration policy. It would have turned me off to voting for him if the Bush Administration hadn't all but destroyed this economy, and I was faced with the option of Obama and a Bush buddy who aligned with Bush on almost every piece of legislation that hit Congress. Then, I listened to Mr. "robot" debate, and just couldn't go there again. No way. Plenty of other Republicans couldn't either.
Now, we have a green President stepping up over his head and learning through trial by fire. It could be worse. It might have been better. We all wish it had been better. Still, he didn't bait and switch as far as I'm concerned.
I'll pay attention to what Obama says he intends to do and how he intends to go about it. I've paid a lot of attention to Mitt Romney, and I did last go round. He leaves me cold. I don't know what commitments he's made to us, because he continues to evade tough questions. I just hate mealy mouthed politicians, and Romney is the only other choice we have. He's a flip-flopper. None of us really knows what he'll do about immigration, but we do know he's a friend to business. He's not going to satisfy your need for blood on that score. He'll accommodate business interests and needs.
On the two economic proposals - Mitt still loses. Neither one has it right, but Mitt has both tax policy and economic policy wrong - more wrong than Obama. It may be the most frustrating time for Americans since the Great Depression, but you'd better do your homework and continue demanding Romney get SPECIFIC and stop tap dancing if you want to know what's in that pig in a poke facade.

Judged:

2

2

1

Quirky wrote:

<quoted text>
Your full of it Hun, And most here see that. You seem to not know exactly where you stand. Though at one time you did. Get with the program Shugans. Your supreme leader does not have America`s best interst`s in mind.

Judged:

1

1

1

O Rely wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh boy The Las Vegas Trib, I hate to pour cold water on your exiting documentation but the LV Trib is one of those fish-wrappers you find for free in front of your cheap hotel door in the morning - sorry Charlie ...

Judged:

2

2

2

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>He's a better deal for American regulars than the other guy. That's exactly what it boils down to, Q.

Judged:

2

2

1

StellarKnight wrote:

The Winner of the Stop Obama the Dictator contest won $10.000.00
Runner up cha ching a cool $5,000.00
funny as the dickens to see both how they won and the honorable mentions.
http://www.infowars.com/victory-over-tyrants-...
(Kudo's..very creative)

Judged:

2

1

1

Vet wrote:

<quoted text>
Especially the little illegal immigrants... ahead of our returning combat vets.

Judged:

3

3

3

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text>He's a better deal for American regulars than the other guy. That's exactly what it boils down to, Q.

Judged:

1

1

1

Excellent wrote:

<quoted text>I like the story about the vet that was given a mortgage free home. That is a good one.

Judged:

1

1

1

NTRPRNR1 wrote:

<quoted text> Who funds La Raza? The Ford Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Citigroup and Wal-Mart to name a few. Here's the list of corporate sponsors who fund the organization:
http://www.theamericanresistance.com/race_ind...
Corporate America funds NCLR. They are enjoying cheap labor, and if it ever changes to legitimacy, NCLR will organize a union for them that will continue to cater to corporate needs in exchange for all of that union clout and influence that would be created for the top executives at the organization.