Obama Leads Us to NEW DEPRESSION !

HOPE AND CHANGE ----

Hope you don't mind me changing your Constitution.

Hope you don't mind me changing your Free Capitalism to Communism.

Hope you don't mind me Changing the value of your money.

Hope you don't mind me changing control of your life to the Govt.

Hope you don't mind me changing your healthcare so
I can ration it.

Hope you don't mind me changing the size cars you drive.

Hope you don't mind me changing the kind of fuel you can use.

Hope you don't mind me changing the Authority of the Congress and Senate by "appointing" CZARS (dictators).

Hope you don't mind me changing the people the U.S. supports from Democratic countrys to the Fascist and Communist countries.

Hope you don't mind me changing the education system into a "liberal" curriculum.

Hope you don't mind me changing the foriegn policy of the country to include apologies and money (we don't have).

What is your HOPE AND CHANGE????????

Let's see, ANON also posts as WAKE UP AMERICA. Just today, Pat Hill is also Lazy Loony Liberal is also Kent Robbins is also Stench Obama.

You GOP MORONS are really hilarious.

You can't defend the NON-policies of the Rush Party, but you can spend all day thinking up different post names and posting your Limbaugh propaganda. If you GOP LOSERS spent as much time trying to formulate a coherent policy as you do posting crap on these forums, you might actually come up with something useful.

Nah, after 8 years, you didn't come with ANYTHING useful, why should we expect anything to change now...

doodah wrote:

HOPE AND CHANGE ----
Hope you don't mind me changing your Constitution.
Hope you don't mind me changing your Free Capitalism to Communism.
Hope you don't mind me Changing the value of your money.
Hope you don't mind me changing control of your life to the Govt.
Hope you don't mind me changing your healthcare so
I can ration it.
Hope you don't mind me changing the size cars you drive.
Hope you don't mind me changing the kind of fuel you can use.
Hope you don't mind me changing the Authority of the Congress and Senate by "appointing" CZARS (dictators).
Hope you don't mind me changing the people the U.S. supports from Democratic countrys to the Fascist and Communist countries.
Hope you don't mind me changing the education system into a "liberal" curriculum.
Hope you don't mind me changing the foriegn policy of the country to include apologies and money (we don't have).
What is your HOPE AND CHANGE????????

Right on this.

Exxy wrote:

<quoted text>
Laughable. I hear Rush every day and you like to repeat a lot of the catchphrases again and again. In fact, you immediately follow up this post with:
<quoted text>
That's a Rushism right there buddy, and you know it is.

Sorry, I don't listen to Rush. Answer this. Did you wish for Bush to succeed or did you hate him so much that you wanted him to fail?

Oooook wrote:

<quoted text>
I voted for Bush. I voted for McCain. I do not agree with the vast majority of Obama's policies. I am, however, a reasonable person, and understand that I need to base my arguments on rational, concrete issues.
I have no problem with Rush (he's on in my office as we speak actually), but I am smart enough to distinguish the legitimate points from the entertainment. I was responding to ANON's claims that he does not listen to Rush. This is clearly false, as the vast majority of his statements are simply Rushisms upon Rushisms. I pointed out that, in one post he stated that he does not listen to Rush. In the very next post, he shot off a Rushism. At no point in my statement did I suggest that I was a liberal or supported Obama.

Isn't that funny. I can pick out Obamaism/Sorosisms in all of you liberal replies. Example: Obama says "We inherited a mess. We underestimated how long it would take to fix it. And you liberals say "He's only been in office 5-6 months. He can't fix it in that amount of time. Get over it. It's his mess and he doesn't know what to do. He's inexperienced and unqualified the job.

Exxy wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, I am no Obama supporter. I voted for McCain and disagree with many Obama policies, but that is where I differ from many (I hesitate to say 'most' but I think that is probably true as well) Limbaugh listeners: I understand policy and debate on its merits.

Tell us all of the policies of Obama that you don't agree with.
1. Cap and trade?
2. National health care?
3. Taking over GM and firing it's head?
4. Others too numerous to mention.

GOP Sopporters are MORONS wrote:

Let's see, ANON also posts as WAKE UP AMERICA. Just today, Pat Hill is also Lazy Loony Liberal is also Kent Robbins is also Stench Obama.
You GOP MORONS are really hilarious.
You can't defend the NON-policies of the Rush Party, but you can spend all day thinking up different post names and posting your Limbaugh propaganda. If you GOP LOSERS spent as much time trying to formulate a coherent policy as you do posting crap on these forums, you might actually come up with something useful.
Nah, after 8 years, you didn't come with ANYTHING useful, why should we expect anything to change now...

You type a lot and say nothing of substance. Tell us how much Obama/Soros has done for the country.

Ok, there is a LOT to say here, so bear with me.

ANON wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, I don't listen to Rush. Answer this. Did you wish for Bush to succeed or did you hate him so much that you wanted him to fail?

If you honestly don't listen to Rush, then you clearly listen to enough people who do to repeat this again and again (the whole "I want Obama to succeed as much as you wanted Bush to succeed" thing started immediately after the election - on Rush's show.
As for Bush, I believe he did what was necessary for the country, and got an unfairly bad rap from the left wing. The Dems literally sabotaged every single Bush policy in order to set themselves up for a victory in the recent election. They purposely dicked up the country on Bush's watch, knowing full well that most of the American public would associate it with him.
So, I think Bush was a good man, who tried to do what was best for the country, and was sabotaged at every turn.

ANON wrote:

<quoted text>Isn't that funny. I can pick out Obamaism/Sorosisms in all of you liberal replies. Example: Obama says "We inherited a mess. We underestimated how long it would take to fix it. And you liberals say "He's only been in office 5-6 months. He can't fix it in that amount of time. Get over it. It's his mess and he doesn't know what to do. He's inexperienced and unqualified the job.

That's interesting that you believe you can pick out either of those examples in my posts, because I literally have not said either one. Seriously, go look through my posts and find where I have said either.
And what the hell is with including "Sorosisms" in there? A few months ago you had no idea who she was, and she sure as hell has refrained from commenting on presidential politics. The woman is scary, but simply associated all liberal comments with her (again, we see a strong Rush influence here) is ignorant.

ANON wrote:

<quoted text>
Tell us all of the policies of Obama that you don't agree with.
1. Cap and trade?
2. National health care?
3. Taking over GM and firing it's head?
4. Others too numerous to mention.

Cap and Trade: Do not EVEN get me started on this. I work for an engineering firm, and the damage it will indirectly do to our business is serious. It is a poorly thought-out, idiotic measure which will have lasting negative effects. If you'd like, we can discuss this further after this post as I have PLENTY to say about it.
National Health Care: I actually wrote my grad thesis on this. Against it, I might add. The average wait time in the UK to see a specialist was 6 months in 2001; this has improved somewhat since, but not by any huge margin. Can you imagine that? The average optometrist wait? 8 months. I cannot imagine that the US government would be any more efficient than the UK's.
With that said, if done well nationalized healthcare does work. The US currently ranks 15th in life expectancy among developed countries; it ranks 1st among healthcare spending. Something is clearly not right here. I think that some socialization of the healthcare system is inevitable. I don't support it, but the facts speak for themselves and Obama has made this an issue he will focus on.
Taking Over GM: Screw this. It should never, in the United States of America, be acceptable for the government to take control of a private company. With that said, it is technically legal (I'll refer you back to our previous conversation regarding the Commerce Act and the 10th Amendment), and the government does not technically control the company (doesn't own the majority of the stocks). How the hell the government can dismiss the sitting head of the company without owning a majority share is absolutely beyond me, and should not be allowed in any way.
I'll applaud you for this last post; you actually pointed out specific, relevant issues, rather than engaging in endless ad hominum attacks on the man himself. This is how you debate intelligently.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: I think you and I agree on many issues. I simply choose to point out that, for the most part, you ignore these issues in favor of pursuing fallacious arguments which have no real merit.

Ranae wrote:

<quoted text>
Bush got us into debt with China. You people are really totally clueless bout your government and who's on first, aren't you? THAT'S why our nation failed the last 8 years. THAT'S why our jobs left at a record pace and you fools voted them in again and again.
do this nation a favor. Figure out what you're talking about and make it based upon facts..then open mouth.

Ahhh! The queen of cut and paste. Next just paste it to your pathetic and kool aid soaked a$$.

Exxy wrote:

Ok, there is a LOT to say here, so bear with me.
<quoted text>And what the hell is with including "Sorosisms" in there? A few months ago you had no idea who she was, and she sure as hell has refrained from commenting on presidential politics. The woman is scary, but simply associated all liberal comments with her (again, we see a strong Rush influence here) is ignorant.

This clearly shows your ignorance. George Soros is an ultra-liberal who has contributed to Democrats to get them elected and he is calling the shots. I agree that Sotomayor is scary, but that is another issue. You should start listening to Fox News, fair and balanced. I guarantee that you will never listen to Newtwork news again after listening to Fox.