Islanders barely hold on to beat Thrashers

Rangers Suck wrote:

and by the way, it's almost February......you can take down the "happy new year"

Rangers Suck wrote:

it also pretty predictable that you would bring up something like playing against a poor team.......typical Ranger fan being scared of little brother having success......same old song my man, same old song
BAILEY DOWN THE RIGHT WING. TO OKPOSO. HE SHOOTS. HE SCORES!

ETR wrote:

<quoted text>
It was good enough or you would have a better reply....

ETR wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, it is, you know how I like to post facts. Maybe you should it try it some time.....
Same old song? pffft, that song isn't get much air time buddy.....

Rangers Suck wrote:

<quoted text>
Come on, how many chances do I have to give you? I mean, that was lame, even coming from you. I'll give you one more shot to redeem yourself, but this is it.....I have to leave soon so please make it good.

Rangers Suck wrote:

<quoted text>
Ohhh rite rite, kind of like the fact I threw out there about your Rags getting smoked in Pitt the other night? Maybe your just looking for facts that don't put your team in a bad light? I really don't know where to go from here, I can't let this go on anymore. I gave you 3 chances to come with something good, I'm disappointed.
I guess I have to close the door on you, for now it's Bailey to Okposo. Get used to it, you'll be hearing lots more in the future. And that, my friend, is a fact.
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!

ETR wrote:

<quoted text>
The only reason I shot you down about the Rangers is because it was not relevant to the conversation or this board. Aren't you always the one complaining when people bring up items that are off the topic of the board? you try to talk a good game but you are nothing but smoke and mirrors and only want to post by your own set of rules, ya moderator wannabe ya....
You **** door on yourself son, keep dreaming about your two Islander boys at night, it's the only way you are going to hear those words as often as you like.....

Busey wrote:

<quoted text>
How is the arena? Is it a city like atmosphere? Or more suburban?
I have no clue what Columbus looks like....

Rob wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, the last place team has a 25% chance of winning the lottery... but the next 4 (the teams that could potentially move up to take the first pick) combine for a 51.8% chance of winning the lottery.
So overall, the last place team has a 48.2% chance of picking first.

John Tavares wrote:

<quoted text>
Uh.... what ?
Lets revisit:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
No, I can read just fine. You said "Well they got a win and that brings them 2 points further from guaranteeing the #1 pick in the draft."
You're wrong. No guarantees !!! Just admit you were wrong or made a mistake.

Rangers Suck wrote:

<quoted text>
Still not even clooose to good enough. You let us all down. Hell, I should have **** door earlier and saved your time and mine.
It's been a blast seeing you flail around, made the P.M. go by a lot quicker. Maybe next time I'm bored I'll give you another chance at redemption, but your lifelines are all used up for this week. Until then....
BAILEY. TO OKPOSO. HE SHOOTS. HE SCORES! Ahhh, I love it.

Snow Job wrote:

So lets get this straight, Gordon's "system" almost loses another game in the third period, he doesn't want to talk about it, and we should give him a pass? I want to know why he doesn't do more to protect his lead or have another strategy to throw out there when the opposition figures out how to counter this failed system. Pay close attention to him behind the bench and you will see that he becomes completely unhinged when his team starts to fall apart. The team's play reflects the stability or style of their coach and it's obvious that he is consistently out coached and over matched. He is not an NHL caliber coach and the fans, media and players know that. Wouldn't it be better for these kids to play for an established and proven coach or would having an experienced hockey mind in the system be to intimidating for Garth Snow?

Rangers Suck wrote:

<quoted text>
Ohhh rite rite, kind of like the fact I threw out there about your Rags getting smoked in Pitt the other night? Maybe your just looking for facts that don't put your team in a bad light? I really don't know where to go from here, I can't let this go on anymore. I gave you 3 chances to come with something good, I'm disappointed.
I guess I have to close the door on you, for now it's Bailey to Okposo. Get used to it, you'll be hearing lots more in the future. And that, my friend, is a fact.
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!

skating on sand wrote:

<quoted text> Okay you can read and you can "quote" but you certainly can't comprehend. That's the sign of an idiot. There's no guarantee at #1 no matter what position they finish in. I'll try it in crayon next time so you can understand.

skating on sand wrote:

Well they got a win and that brings them 2 points further from guaranteeing the #1 pick in the draft. Last nights game made Atlanta move closer to the Isles in the standings.If the Isles win a few more games and move up a spot you can kiss Tarvares goodby. You can't have it both ways. I say break up the kid line and move deeper into the hole.