Bullitt Co. smoking ban ruled unconstitutional

so i guess i still keep my little corner of the bar,resturant and everywhere else for these nicotin fiends

lennyfromthedepot wrote:

so i guess i still keep my little corner of the bar,resturant and everywhere else for these nicotin fiends

Bullit county is for US REDNECKS, YANKEE. We dont want yalls liberal hippie butts tellin us what to do an now its time for yall to suck it up or get packin and move to new england or commie california where yall'd fit in!

WTG,,,now for the first states ruling of smoking bans are unconstitutional

http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/tempx/693460.pd...

An appeal would be useful, based on the clear lack of reasoning of the court. Anyone sitting judge whose insight fails so miserably as to permit this statement should be put out to pasture:

"The court disagreed, raising the possibility that the Health Department could as easily try to regulate how much sleep people should get or whether they should eat red meat or candy."

Which of those three items is an issue because of its effect on those around the person engaging activity? None of them. The entire statement shows either extremely limited reasoning ability or sufficient bias that the guy should have recused himself from the case.

Please note that it is not a smoking ban that was ruled unconstitutional, but only the source of the regulation. The representatives of the cities taking the health department to task were saying that was their job--and the health department rep is saying, "so do it, already."

I predict there will be enough people who support the idea of the regulation--and who were pleased and relieved at the prospect of its enacting--that taking it back from the will cause significant backlash and the communities will demand that those who claim the power to do it follow through for them.

th efiscal court and 8 cities sued..in KY the fiscal court is the legislators, I would say the ban is doomed...period!!! WTG!!!!

Its me Linda B wrote:

th efiscal court and 8 cities sued..in KY the fiscal court is the legislators, I would say the ban is doomed...period!!! WTG!!!!

That particular incarnation of it may be, depending on how hard the county health department wants to fight over it. Again, though, consider the premise for the suit. It was not "That isn't a good thing to do!" It was "HEY! That's OUR job!"

Watch and see if there aren't a huge number of constituents ragging on those legislators to get ON with it, now that they have so publicly asserted their authority to do so. Think maybe re-election is important enough that they might do something themselves?

Hugh Jass wrote:

<quoted text>
That particular incarnation of it may be, depending on how hard the county health department wants to fight over it. Again, though, consider the premise for the suit. It was not "That isn't a good thing to do!" It was "HEY! That's OUR job!"
Watch and see if there aren't a huge number of constituents ragging on those legislators to get ON with it, now that they have so publicly asserted their authority to do so. Think maybe re-election is important enough that they might do something themselves?

I would bet the constituents did indeed let the fiscal court know that they are against the ban thus the lawsuit, we have seen expamples of those fraud polls for that 70+%

Its me Linda B wrote:

<quoted text> I would bet the constituents did indeed let the fiscal court know that they are against the ban thus the lawsuit, we have seen expamples of those fraud polls for that 70+%

You truly live your life in denial and self-delusion.

It`s pretty simple, just put it on the ballot.

Hugh Jass wrote:

Please note that it is not a smoking ban that was ruled unconstitutional, but only the source of the regulation. The representatives of the cities taking the health department to task were saying that was their job--and the health department rep is saying, "so do it, already."
I predict there will be enough people who support the idea of the regulation--and who were pleased and relieved at the prospect of its enacting--that taking it back from the will cause significant backlash and the communities will demand that those who claim the power to do it follow through for them.

You dont know crap and got no right to predict anything, we're rednecks here and 95 % of us smoke or chew. you dont live in kentucky, yankee, youre from tn. but you sound like a commie liberal californian, so why dont you take your yankee ideals north where people like you fit in?

No Smoking Sign wrote:

<quoted text>
You truly live your life in denial and self-delusion.

LOL some yankee tofu eating liberal from COLORADO wants to chime in on bullit county ky? dude we're all rednecks just about, we like to smoke here and fight and drink our whiskey.

CBRADIOLOVER wrote:

<quoted text>
You dont know crap and got no right to predict anything, we're rednecks here and 95 % of us smoke or chew. you dont live in kentucky, yankee, youre from tn. but you sound like a commie liberal californian, so why dont you take your yankee ideals north where people like you fit in?

Your mom is a Yankee you lame brain moron. Now brush that one tooth you have left and shut the hell up.

CBRADIOLOVER wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL some yankee tofu eating liberal from COLORADO wants to chime in on bullit county ky? dude we're all rednecks just about, we like to smoke here and fight and drink our whiskey.

And you all have the exact same DNA. Now go kiss your inbreeding family good night, and go to bed.

No Smoking Sign wrote:

<quoted text>
You truly live your life in denial and self-delusion.

actually the proof is in ODH own documentation..Now KY should kick out the pharma funded Ms Hahn and declare her public enemy #1

Hugh Jass wrote:

An appeal would be useful, based on the clear lack of reasoning of the court. Anyone sitting judge whose insight fails so miserably as to permit this statement should be put out to pasture:
"The court disagreed, raising the possibility that the Health Department could as easily try to regulate how much sleep people should get or whether they should eat red meat or candy."
Which of those three items is an issue because of its effect on those around the person engaging activity? None of them. The entire statement shows either extremely limited reasoning ability or sufficient bias that the guy should have recused himself from the case.

You my dear are wrong,your family and friends are hurt when red meat hurts you or the sugar that causes high sugar levels that causes death,

CBRADIOLOVER wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL some yankee tofu eating liberal from COLORADO wants to chime in on bullit county ky? dude we're all rednecks just about, we like to smoke here and fight and drink our whiskey.

YEEEHAAAAAW!

xyz wrote:

<quoted text> You my dear are wrong,your family and friends are hurt when red meat hurts you or the sugar that causes high sugar levels that causes death,

Yep, copious quantities of sugar might help explain ol' Lar dAss.

CBRADIOLOVER wrote:

<quoted text>
Bullit county is for US REDNECKS, YANKEE. We dont want yalls liberal hippie butts tellin us what to do an now its time for yall to suck it up or get packin and move to new england or commie california where yall'd fit in!

Spoken like a true inbred Kentucky hillbilly. It's time Kentucky clean up its act because us "Liberal Hippies" are getting sick and tired of paying for your F'n Health Care, Welfare, and Food Stamps.

Every health study you read about Kentucky is always at the bottom. What a shame. Don't you realise everyone is laughing and shaking their heads at you in disgust? Something to be really proud of Kentucky. Not!!!

Here is a link to the actual ruling, so you don't have to work through the bias of any reporter. The bias of the judge we can't escape but, again, that's what appellate courts are for.

http://www.wfpl.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/0...