Britney Spears - Spears Snapped Smoking Next to Son

Judged:

2

2

2

Smoke Free wrote:

A SMOKING Mother!!! Damn, what a great role model.
Any Mother that smokes in 2008 is a F'n loser.
Talk about CHILD ABUSE.

Judged:

2

2

1

harleyrider1978 wrote:

<quoted text> These antis think the world evolves around them........in the real world as you describe much more than 15% smoke around kids....in my area proably like 70% do.....of course we are in the tobacco belt.....and do you realise al gore grows 100,000 pounds of tobacco still today on his daddys farm in carthage tenn.

Judged:

3

3

2

Oklahoma Sweetheart wrote:

<quoted text>
What BS. Look around you, moron. If one can count and has eyes, one can look around any crowd and count/see far more than "14.8%" of people smoking in front of children. But they don't have to worry about "bad air"....there are a few (not many, but a few) people, like you, who breathe such "holy air", into any crowd that the surrounding atmosphere is instantly cleansed and sanctified.

Judged:

4

2

2

harleyrider1978 wrote:

dont worry brit, we are beside you in this fight.
oh and by the way smoking doesnt hurt your kids or even give you a negative public view......rock on hottie

Judged:

1

1

1

Real Free America wrote:

<quoted text>
First of all...your comment tells the world a whole lot about you. Stats say...Only approx 20% of Americans smoke and the numbers are dropping dead daily. Of them...I am guessing you have approx 20-25% of those who are considerate around others..which include smoking around children.
Now back to you....I am guessing the circles you are around smoke a lot. That may include deadbeats, riffraff and degenerates.
As you look around during your smoke-filled day you must see a lot of the population smoking and think the whole world smokes like smoke stacks.
If you would venture past the lowlife areas you frequent, you would see...the smarter and classier they are..the less they smoke.

Judged:

2

1

1

Happy Contented Soul wrote:

<quoted text>Real Free America is just a _________ trying to deflect our disgust by slinging mud everywhere but where it belongs.

Judged:

2

Non-Cas Fan wrote:

<quoted text>FOUL!
Again, you crossed the line, in my opinion.
It's bad enough to call each other idiots, rifraff, low-life, scumbag, &c.
But naming someone a pedophile just because they disagree with you is over the line.

Judged:

1

Oklahoma Sweetheart wrote:

<quoted text>
"Happy Contented Soul" has "crossed the line AGAIN"? "Happy Contented Soul" has only posted once. And, his/her post wasn't any more "foul" than those posted by "Smoke Free". And, don't be too hard on "Smoke Free" either. "Smoke Free" is just trying to be amusing.

Judged:

3

2

2

Non-Cas Fan wrote:

<quoted text>
There was an incident last year, that's what I mean by "again".
"Smoke free" is deluded to the point where he thinks I am a smoker. That, and failed arguments is all "smoke free" has.

Judged:

3

2

2

Non-Cas Fan wrote:

<quoted text>FOUL!
Again, you crossed the line, in my opinion.
It's bad enough to call each other idiots, rifraff, low-life, scumbag, &c.
But naming someone a pedophile just because they disagree with you is over the line.

Judged:

1

1

1

Non-Cas Fan wrote:

<quoted text>FOUL!
Again, you crossed the line, in my opinion.
It's bad enough to call each other idiots, rifraff, low-life, scumbag, &c.
But naming someone a pedophile just because they disagree with you is over the line.

Real Free America wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, Golly Geeee...I missed this one....
Here we have a girl no one wanted so she is mad at the world. She said she quit smoking but started back and has too much pride to admit it.
She was gaining way too much wieght and the quit smoking thing backfired on her butt out.
She now promotes smoking around you, your children and our elderly. What a winner she is!!! She is too stupid to realize what she is doing so I don't get down on her too much.
She too does not have a life...just like all her buddies who post pro smoking garbage each and every time.
I chuckle ..OK I LOL...every time another ban is passed...it must really pisss them off when that happens. The only thing that ever saves their sanity is an occasional letter that goes nowhere. It gives them something to post, and post and post.
Even if it does cause action their way for the moment...most is only temporary.
That is the sole responsibility of the one that goes by U dont own me...which nobody wants to own anyhow. Ask her to look around the room and see for herself.

Judged:

1

1

1

Oklahoma Sweetheart wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't feel too bad. "Smoke Free" is deluded to the point where he thinks I'm not only a smoker, but that I live in a trailer. LOL
Whenever I read his posts, I envision this hairy guy, sitting at his comuter, in his underwear, while he feverishly types away...I wonder if he foams at the mouth as he types.

Happy Contented Soul wrote:

<quoted text>
Foul you say... Here's one the degenerate just posted at Sassy...
<quoted text>
NCF, you have your own opinions, just as the rest of us pro-choice folks have ours. Some of us have seen enough in our lives to understand the pure evil inherent in those whose primary purpose for existence is to control others for their own gratification.
If you wish to cry foul, well that is your right, but you won't find me in agreement with you on this issue.

Judged:

4

3

3

Smoke Free wrote:

A SMOKING Mother!!! Damn, what a great role model.
Any Mother that smokes in 2008 is a F'n loser.
Talk about CHILD ABUSE.

Judged:

5

4

3

idiotfinder wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, take all children from their parents and put them in foster homes so tax payers can support them. While your at it, all parents who smoked around their children for the last 80 years should be jailed on child abuse charges. What a stupid A$$ you are!

Judged:

2

2

2

Smoke Free wrote:

<quoted text>
You didn't read what I said PUTZ!!!
I didn't say 80 years ago. I said if you smoke in 2008 you're a F'n loser.
We didn't know all the dangers years back.
With all that is published about the hazards of second hand smoke and if you only believed half of that AND YOU STILL SMOKE around children then you my putz friend are a F'n loser.
When I was a kid we used to play with Mercury in science class and at home. Would you allow your children in 2008 to play with mercury?
If you did it would be child abuse, just as subjecting them to Second Hand Smoke in 2008.
Would you paint your walls with lead paint?
Same thing as subjecting your kids to Second Hand Smoke. We were all subjected to lead paint but WHY TAKE THE CHANCE IN 2008???
If you want to smoke go OUTSIDE and out of site of your children, IT'S SHAMEFUL!!!!

Judged:

2

2

2

Smoke Free wrote:

<quoted text>
You didn't read what I said PUTZ!!!
I didn't say 80 years ago. I said if you smoke in 2008 you're a F'n loser.
We didn't know all the dangers years back.
With all that is published about the hazards of second hand smoke and if you only believed half of that AND YOU STILL SMOKE around children then you my putz friend are a F'n loser.
When I was a kid we used to play with Mercury in science class and at home. Would you allow your children in 2008 to play with mercury?
If you did it would be child abuse, just as subjecting them to Second Hand Smoke in 2008.
Would you paint your walls with lead paint?
Same thing as subjecting your kids to Second Hand Smoke. We were all subjected to lead paint but WHY TAKE THE CHANCE IN 2008???
If you want to smoke go OUTSIDE and out of site of your children, IT'S SHAMEFUL!!!!

Judged:

1

1

1

fluteman greg wrote:

<quoted text>Hmmmmm..... I don't believe you are in any position to tell people how to raise their children. Mercury and lead paint are health hazards. Children visibily seeing their parents smoking IS NOT a health hazard. That statement is in response to your ridiculous comment about smoking out of sight to your children. Again, you have no say so in the matter. Now go admire your swastika.