Homosexuality against natural law

fedupwiththemess wrote:

<quoted text>I told you. Gays can't procreate together. Even in an infertile man/woman couple...GOD can still create a miracle and the woman can have a baby. Never will that happen with gays. A man can never carry a baby.

Not without the intervention of the scientific and medical professionals.

Isabella wrote:

<quoted text>
It is not productive to our world to instill rights for sinful behavior. It starts a chain reaction for more sins. Desensitizing.

Our world does not operate according to your bible, separation of church and state, remember?

As for the slippery slope scare tactic, it only proves who the hypocrit really is.....YOU!

fedupwiththemess wrote:

<quoted text>They have a womb...they can carry a child if GOD wants them to. Never can a man carry a child. No womb.

An intersex person may be born with male genetalia and male hormones....and a womb. You are such a dork;0)

DebJ wrote:

<quoted text>
An intersex person may be born with male genetalia and male hormones....and a womb. You are such a dork;0)

or a straight man can simply swallow a baggie... problem solved

DebJ wrote:

<quoted text>
Another interesting point is that a higher percentage of gays are southpaws than in the heterosexual sector. Scientists don't exactly know what to do with that tidbit yet. Some people think that science should make discoveries according to their own personal timetable.
We'll simply learn more as we go, no more and certainly no less.

wouldn't that mean that bisexual people must be ambidextrous, also?

THE OLD BORNGAY wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah,, and your point is?.. I am what I am. the way GOD made me darling,, too bad if its not what YOU expect... Its not about you... Too may people here quick to throw stones and condemn people in God's behalf.. Most of them strait proclaiming they know everything there is to know about a gay person. You are the ones that are angering GOD... not us.

Point is, don't bring your sin into the world and push it upon us like it is supposed to be healthy or good for society. Because it isn't. No sin has ever been for our society. Try some of these for a taste of sin and tell me if its all good: Free Sex- Adultery (divorce and destroying families), fornication creating babies from unmarried woman and abortion, pornography, rape, incest, pedophile, polygamy and of course homosexuality that you want to have legal rights. Which one of the other sexual sins would you like to offer rights? If homosexuality is given rights, then why not the others. Who is sin hurting anyway??? What a bunch of lies! We won't stand with you, we will stand against you. On the side righteousness we take a stand!

Avery wrote:

<quoted text>
Point is, don't bring your sin into the world and push it upon us like it is supposed to be healthy or good for society. Because it isn't. No sin has ever been for our society. Try some of these for a taste of sin and tell me if its all good: Free Sex- Adultery (divorce and destroying families), fornication creating babies from unmarried woman and abortion, pornography, rape, incest, pedophile, polygamy and of course homosexuality that you want to have legal rights. Which one of the other sexual sins would you like to offer rights? If homosexuality is given rights, then why not the others. Who is sin hurting anyway??? What a bunch of lies! We won't stand with you, we will stand against you. On the side righteousness we take a stand!

please explain to us where you got the idea that homosexuality is a sin.

Isabella wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you for sharing. You are definitely correct about homosexuality always existing. And God brought much punishment for it. As much as many don't like to admit in the gay community, God sees homosexuality as an abomination before His eyes. Only thru his son Jesus, can you be cleansed of this sin and practice it no more. It can happen. Many have taken this path successfully and are living a wonderful fulfilled life. Homosexuality is a product of rebellion against your own flesh and if you give into this sin, the Bible says you will pay the consequences. Sowing and Reaping.

Rubbish! People are born with differing sexualities. Every quote in the Bible is associated with either sexual promiscuity or idol worship. We get into problems when we pick verses out of context. Adultery is much more serious. Read the Gospels carefully and you will find that breaking the ten commandments is more serious than sexual indiscretions. Breaking a vow to God is also more serious. Therefore, if one marries and divorces 'unlawfully'(according to Biblical definitions) they commit adultery. Yet if we take all of what Jesus preaches in the Gospel, we find a bigger picture. We learn of compassion, justice, mercy and forgiveness. Why do you suppose the story of the adulterous woman in John 8 is misplaced in the bible? It is because church leaders in the 3rd century did not want Jesus to forgive adultery. The passage would have been lost had a 3rd century scribe not hidden it in the Gospel of John. It actually fits very well at the end of Luke 21. You need to stop looking at other peoples supposed sins and live as the Gospel of Matthew teaches. Matthew 7:1. If God did not want gays, God would not have created them in the first place.

Isabella wrote:

<quoted text>
The scrolls are thousands of years old. They were transformed into English so Americans can read the scroll's words.

Just by writing that alone, I will read no further of your posts. You are as steeped in ignorance as you are in bigotry. You are a waste of time and space.

dances with weebles wrote:

<quoted text>
or a straight man can simply swallow a baggie... problem solved

Turkey basters and baggies.....it just gets better and better;0)

dances with weebles wrote:

<quoted text>
wouldn't that mean that bisexual people must be ambidextrous, also?

My brother is straight and ambidextrous......is he abnormal?

Avery wrote:

<quoted text>
Point is, don't bring your sin into the world and push it upon us like it is supposed to be healthy or good for society. Because it isn't. No sin has ever been for our society. Try some of these for a taste of sin and tell me if its all good: Free Sex- Adultery (divorce and destroying families), fornication creating babies from unmarried woman and abortion, pornography, rape, incest, pedophile, polygamy and of course homosexuality that you want to have legal rights. Which one of the other sexual sins would you like to offer rights? If homosexuality is given rights, then why not the others. Who is sin hurting anyway??? What a bunch of lies! We won't stand with you, we will stand against you. On the side righteousness we take a stand!

I'll give you a clue. Rape, incest, pedophilia, adultery etc. all have one thing in common....victims. Unconsenting or unable to consent victims. Consentual gay sex between two unrelated adults leaves no victims. You compare gays to many criminal activities also which is an insult to ALL gays.

They may be sins in YOUR opinion but interactions between human beings which does no harm is legal in this country. We do not base law on your opinion.

Isabella wrote:

<quoted text>
He didn't MAKE you Gay, you CHOSE to be gay. Big difference. Homosexuality is a behavior. There is no conclusive scientific proof that anyone is born as a homosexual. It is a lie told by those who want to practice the sin; nothing more. You are a product of your environment. Can you look back and see what might have triggered your homosexuality? What was your relationship with your father. That is usually where the problem exists. Lack of love by a father. thanks

There is *no* scientific proof that being gay is a choice. It is a lie told by those who wish to condemn others without reason, nothing more.

you are a product of hatred

can you look back and work out what triggered your bigotry? Was ity your relationship with your pastor? Thats usually where the problem begins. In church

And on a more important point,*where* is your PROOF that homosexuality is choice? provide that and people may listen to you

Isabella wrote:

<quoted text>
I've read those reports and again, they came up with no conclusive data that supports a gene for homosexuality. Same holds true for hetero...no conclusive genes either way. It is a sexual choice.

following this 'logic' one is forced to conclude that cerebral palsy is a choice. There are NO genes for cerebral palsy

So are you advocating that, since cerebral palsy is, according to you, a choice, we should stop supporting such people and throw them onto the streets?

Or,*perhaps* we can deduce from this that some biological effects can be *innate* but not genetic

LuLu Ford wrote:

<quoted text>
Guess you have no knowledge of science. It is no problem to place the sperm and the egg together and create an embryo. There are surrogate mother's, fathers and egg donors. Yes the miracle happens all the time. So much for your theory.

Listen fool. Two gay men or two gay women can not procreate together and produce a child that genetically comes from both.

DebJ wrote:

<quoted text>
Turkey basters and baggies.....it just gets better and better;0)

see what you can do with your mr. wizard chemistry set and a few odds and ends from the kitchen? amazing, huh?

fedupwiththemess wrote:

<quoted text>Listen fool. Two gay men or two gay women can not procreate together and produce a child that genetically comes from both.

how about a woman all by herself? i already mentioned how they have succeeded in fertilising a woman's egg in a petri dish with her own bone marrow stem cells. it's just a matter of time until they can move it into the woman's body and she can get herself pregnant if and when she wants to. that'll sure take a lot of pressure off of men, huh? i mean, look at all the women there are in the world who won't need them to get pregnant and he can just sit and watch football on tv all he wants to.

cool, huh?

fedupwiththemess wrote:

<quoted text>Listen fool. Two gay men or two gay women can not procreate together and produce a child that genetically comes from both.

So then I guess we should nullify all marriages that do not produce children? Old, infertile, child-less, we need to make a law that says your must have kids withing three years or OOPS! no marriage. There are no "miracles" that give children to heterosexual couples through a normal process.

And they may not be able to have kids together, but what does that matter? One can have a child and the other adopts it, there are plenty of straight marriages that have blended families like this, should they have their right removed? And who said it's the way of the world that heterosexual people are better? Men and women can still have children without being sexuality attracted to each other. The world could easily live on without heteros.

dances with weebles wrote:

<quoted text>
how about a woman all by herself? i already mentioned how they have succeeded in fertilising a woman's egg in a petri dish with her own bone marrow stem cells. it's just a matter of time until they can move it into the woman's body and she can get herself pregnant if and when she wants to. that'll sure take a lot of pressure off of men, huh? i mean, look at all the women there are in the world who won't need them to get pregnant and he can just sit and watch football on tv all he wants to.
cool, huh?

Will never happen.

Desya wrote:

<quoted text>
So then I guess we should nullify all marriages that do not produce children? Old, infertile, child-less, we need to make a law that says your must have kids withing three years or OOPS! no marriage. There are no "miracles" that give children to heterosexual couples through a normal process.
And they may not be able to have kids together, but what does that matter? One can have a child and the other adopts it, there are plenty of straight marriages that have blended families like this, should they have their right removed? And who said it's the way of the world that heterosexual people are better? Men and women can still have children without being sexuality attracted to each other. The world could easily live on without heteros.

Nope. Any loving man/woman equation together is fine. This is the only way, this is the correct way. This is the way GOD wants it. PERIOD.