|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
flbadcatowner wrote: <quoted text>I just went to the CNN website and saw that Obama held a 3 point lead which is less than the statistical range for error of +/- 3.5% in the latest one I could find on the CNN website. The CNN poll also showed Romney with an advantage over Obama in the 15 states listed as battlegrounds on the CNN Electoral Map. Romney was ahead of Obama 51% to 43% in those states, including those that are leaning but not solid for Obama or Romney and those which appear to be true tossups. The battleground survey indicates that Romney clearly has a big advantage in some of those 15 states, but the data does not indicate which states he is currently winning or how big that advantage may actually be. Neither candidate needs to win all 15 of those states in order to win the general election, so the aggregate results from all 15 states do not forecast an Obama loss or a Romney victory.
|
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Bill from NYC wrote: <quoted text>I see no radical side of her why do you. You have tunnel vision I would guess.
|
|
SAV saavy
Greeley, CO
|
Marine Corp Pat wrote: <quoted text> It’s pathetically amusing how you managed to expose your true racist feelings while trying to present yourself as just the messenger with the line,“I hardly think that’s the case” in regards to the unfair stereotypes you desperately need to feel are fitting of Blacks. What’s even more amusing is your claim of the possibility of President Obama being good for ‘the Black community’ in spite of the comment that preceded it:“Obama hates America, Whites and the western culture”. But the line:“they'd bankrupt the nation by voting themselves the national treasury” has to be the most asinine illogical statement ever on these threads, LOL; WOW! I've seen your openly racist statements on other Topix post comparing contemporary conservative black politician to a black-face minstrel singer from the 1800's. You're hardly one to preach. However, since you apparently have reading comprehension problems, I will enlighten you: "I hardly think that's the case" means just what it says: I do not accept Obama's portrayal of blacks. Blacks are no more helpless than Irish are drunks, Italians are Mafia or Poles stupid. Those are all sterotypes. Obama is a leftist radical. They come in all stripes and colors, but what they do hold in common is a failed ideology that will bankrupt the nation, just as is happening in Europe. The failures over there run from pasty-white Irish and Icelanders, to swarthy Greeks and Cypriots. Race has NOTHING to do with it. Obama is doing blacks no favor by repeating his low opinions of their ability to stand on their own and by increasing the size of the welfare state. Financial ruin will affect EVERYONE. No race, religion or group will be exempt. Blacks need what we ALL need: jobs. REAL jobs, not make-work goverment pretend-jobs.
|
|
“The trolls hate this guy”
Since: Jul 09
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Le Jimbo wrote: <quoted text>The CNN poll also showed Romney with an advantage over Obama in the 15 states listed as battlegrounds on the CNN Electoral Map. Romney was ahead of Obama 51% to 43% in those states, including those that are leaning but not solid for Obama or Romney and those which appear to be true tossups. The battleground survey indicates that Romney clearly has a big advantage in some of those 15 states, but the data does not indicate which states he is currently winning or how big that advantage may actually be. Neither candidate needs to win all 15 of those states in order to win the general election, so the aggregate results from all 15 states do not forecast an Obama loss or a Romney victory. I don't care for either Romney or Obama. As much as I dislike Obama, I trust Mr. Flip Flop Take Both Sides of Issues Romney even less than Obama. The plain fact of the matter is you are just plain wrong about Romney having such a big margin in all those showdown states. If what you said is true, one could assume that the safely red states would give Romney something in the order of at least a 55 to 40 edge and most likely greater. Obama would not have nearly a large enough plurality in the solidly blue states to offset that advantage you claim for Romney in the swing states to allow for Obama's current edge in the CNN poll.
|
|
see the light
El Paso, TX
|
SAV saavy wrote: <quoted text> I've seen your openly racist statements on other Topix post comparing contemporary conservative black politician to a black-face minstrel singer from the 1800's. You're hardly one to preach. However, since you apparently have reading comprehension problems, I will enlighten you: "I hardly think that's the case" means just what it says: I do not accept Obama's portrayal of blacks. Blacks are no more helpless than Irish are drunks, Italians are Mafia or Poles stupid. Those are all sterotypes. Obama is a leftist radical. They come in all stripes and colors, but what they do hold in common is a failed ideology that will bankrupt the nation, just as is happening in Europe. The failures over there run from pasty-white Irish and Icelanders, to swarthy Greeks and Cypriots. Race has NOTHING to do with it. Obama is doing blacks no favor by repeating his low opinions of their ability to stand on their own and by increasing the size of the welfare state. Financial ruin will affect EVERYONE. No race, religion or group will be exempt. Blacks need what we ALL need: jobs. REAL jobs, not make-work goverment pretend-jobs. Did you ever think that slavery and Liberals were the same? Slaves were told their every move by their master and Liberals are told their every move by Obama.
|
|
“The trolls hate this guy”
Since: Jul 09
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Le Jimbo wrote: <quoted text>The CNN poll also showed Romney with an advantage over Obama in the 15 states listed as battlegrounds on the CNN Electoral Map. Romney was ahead of Obama 51% to 43% in those states, including those that are leaning but not solid for Obama or Romney and those which appear to be true tossups. The battleground survey indicates that Romney clearly has a big advantage in some of those 15 states, but the data does not indicate which states he is currently winning or how big that advantage may actually be. Neither candidate needs to win all 15 of those states in order to win the general election, so the aggregate results from all 15 states do not forecast an Obama loss or a Romney victory. A little further investigation has shown that some of CNN's "battleground" states are actually usually safe red states while it omits some really truly battleground states where Obama has an edge. CNN shot itself in the foot with that 51 to 43% claim. Other polls show a slight Obama lead in their conception of what is a battleground state.
|
Since: Jan 10
Las Vegas, NV
|
Please wait...
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|