JC, your reading comprehension needs a little work.
If you were a little brighter, you would realize that I have NO problem with generic spinal manipulation when used to treat conditions that might reasonably respond to such manipulation. Conditions like uncomplicated nonradiculopathic low back stiffness and strains.
The reason chiropractic is overwhelmingly filled with quacks is that the majority of chiropractors not only treat unsuspecting people with bizarre techniques like activator, nucca, gonstead, ak, dnft and sot, NONE of which have any evidence to support their use by the way, but also because the majority of chiropractor continue to promote the idiotic idea that "chiropractic subluxations cause disease and illness. Indeed, the largest chiropractic schools in the world, ie palmer, life, logan, sherman etc, continue to teach that kind of idiocy.
It sounds like you know very little about what actually goes on in the chiropractic enterprise.
And though a few chiropractors are stupid enough to claim they can cure things like bed wetting, adhd, deep wounds and addiction by adjusting spines, most play the "chiropractic double speak game"...... they take on patients with conditions and illnesses and claim that they "only remove chiropractic subluxations which will then allow the body heal itself".
Of course that kind of bull crap sounds reasonable o an ignorant chiropractic sycophant like yourself, but to most reasonable people, it pure quackery and hucksterism.
As for chirotalk, there are MDs, PA, RNs, orthotists and current and former chiropractors who post there. Calling them all "failed chiropractors" might make you fell better, but you just lied. Typical.