Local News: Dillon, CO 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Profit shouldn't drive health care

Posted in the Health Forum

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 40 of203
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Jul 2, 2009
 
Brian Jones wrote:
Happy Independence Day!
Could be our last!
With the obummer socialist, Marxist liberal dictatorship coming at us full force, next year at this time it could be.
Unhappy Socialist Dictators Day!
Boy have the liberals turned this once great and strong country into a bunch of whiny, wimpy gimme every thing for nothing obummer lemmings.
You fools, obummer is DESTROYING the USA!
Hey lemmings, concept, try earning something, you may just respect it and your self.
we the people, so far, is much nicer than this.
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Jul 2, 2009
 
We the people wrote:
there is no health care emergency in America! Healthcare should be a proirity for all Americans, however it is not.
The true priorities of the uninsured are:
- big flat screen TVs
- 20" chrome wheels
-$500 mobil devices
-$150 shoes (a pair for every day of the week)
- cloths that don't fit
The healthcare situation is manipulated into a "criss situation". Illegal aliens will be covered by the new healthcare plan, under the code word "families". And guess who gets to pay the bill? Yep, the Average American taxpayer. The middle class. Illegals will no doubt vote for more socialism when Obama pays their way into OUR country. Why wouldnt they? he is breaking our culture and selling out America in order to maintain power for his party for years to come.
I challenge everyone to stop taking our elected officials word at face value, and start doing your own research on these important issues. Ask others for their thoughts. Listen to various programs that are not biased. Look at politicians voting history, let your findings paint a picture of these people. This is the only way to see thru the propaganda and BS. Good luck to you all.
officials'- politicians'- bullshit - those must have been the mistakes previously mentioned. I didn't agree with that comment, either.
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Jul 2, 2009
 
Bamafan wrote:
why is it so hard for you to see that the gov't plan will crush the insurance industry? This is not free enterprise you moron. The gov't doesn't have to (nor will it ever) make a profit, so any other non-gov't competitor is at a huge disadvantage. This is why the US files trade grievances against countries that dump gov't money into steel, autos, airplanes and other items that leave US manufacturers at a disadvantage to compete. And your last point is simply astounding in its juvenile nature. Without profit you wouldn't find anyone to go into the health care business to begin with.
health care and health insurance are not the same thing. health care and drugs are not the same thing.

“Retired Master Gunny USMC”

Since: Jul 08

Las Vegas

ISP: Las Vegas, NV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Jul 2, 2009
 
Has anyone ever really broken down the 46 million who are uninsured?
How many are the young who think they are bullet proof and would rather party with their money then cover themselves?
How many are illgals who are here now leaching off the system and costing everyone of us dearly?
And how many just wish not to be covered cause they get medical by other means?
So where does that leave us,how many really are under insured?
As to making a profit, that's the name of the game, if one couldn't be profitable from a profession he or she picked, why go into it at all?
I agree health care needs some type of reform, but everything uncle sh*t for brains gets involved in cost us three to four times more then the liars in government tell us up front.
GetRidofRitter

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Jul 2, 2009
 
This clown talks out of both sides of his mouth. Read this article: http://www.9news.com/news/world/article.aspx...
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Jul 2, 2009
 
jacksmith wrote:
AMERICA...(leaving out the first part, which ws over-the top, but not awful)...." If congress can not pass a robust public option with at least 51 votes and all robust minimum requirements, congress should immediately move to scrap healthcare reform and request that President Obama declare a state of NATIONAL HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY! Seizing and replacing all PRIVATE FOR PROFIT health insurance plans with the immediate implementation of National Healthcare for all Americans under the provisions of HR676 (A Single-payer National Healthcare Plan For All).
Coverage can begin immediately through our current medicare system. With immediate expansion through recruitment of displaced workers from the canceled private sector insurance industry. Funding can also begin immediately by substitution of payroll deductions for private insurance plans with payroll deductions for the national healthcare plan. This is what the vast majority of the American people want. And this is what all objective experts unanimously agree would be the best, and most cost effective for the American people and our economy.
In Mexico on average people who received medical care for A-H1N1 (Swine Flu) with in 3 days survived. People who did not receive medical care until 7 days or more died. This has been the same results in the US. But 50 million Americans don’t even have any healthcare coverage. And at least 200 million of you with insurance could not get in to see your private insurance plans doctors in 2 or 3 days, even if your life depended on it. WHICH IT DOES!
If President Obama has to declare a NATIONAL STATE OF EMERGENCY to rescue the American people from our healthcare crisis, he will need all the sustained support you can give him. STICK WITH HIM! He’s doing a brilliant job.
THIS IS THE BIG ONE!
THE BATTLE OF GOOD Vs EVIL!
Join the fight.
Contact congress and your representatives NOW! AND SPREAD THE WORD!
God Bless You
Jacksmith – WORKING CLASS
what a strong comment! you lost me with the words - "if congress cannot pass a robust public option" - and with (almost) everything thereafter (maybe you had a fact or two correct, though you had better document it - no one will believe you!). How authoritarian are you?- That is not progrssive? That is stuff to be used by all the right-wing extremists here and elsewhere. I could tolerate threats to vote against Democrats who do not vote for such a bill, in a Democratic primary, or even - at worst - in a general election. I might disagree, depending on the other merits of the Senator, but also I might agree. I would strongly support your forming effective alliances to sell your point of view, to build public support for candidates who support your views, and to assure the brave Senators who are afraid of defeat in the next election, that you will do all you can to get out the vote (legally) to re-elect them. Your comment gives those of us who are progressive, but not dictatorial about it, the opportunity and - I think - responsibility to distance ourselves from your authoritarian solution. There is nothing progressive about the solution you propose, even as only a silly threat, that no one with any sense would believe. I think perhaps you are an extreme "dirty-tricks" right-winger, who only said somewhat rational things in the first half of your comment, in order to scare everyone with the second half of your comment, and alienate people, and discredit progressives. I don't intend to let you get away with it - whichever explanation is the case as to your motives and real opinions.
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Jul 2, 2009
 
I think the issue should be boiled down to what is a robust public option - versus what is too weak and what is too robust. I also see no reason to rule out some sort of cooperative model, even as a third type of option, whynot? There should be adequate pressure on private insurance companies to do the right thing, to serve individual and public health rather than merely profit and high salaries. But they should not be run out of business simply by the provisons of the public insurance option. The private companies should be given every incentive to be competitive, with reasonable and do-able improvements in their behavior. So nice to hear from lefty extremists now and then (I thought they might be extinct!)- but not from authoritarian ones (unfortunately, all to far from being extinct!)
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Jul 2, 2009
 
too - sorry - tried to correct most typos.
Apex Mom

Morrisville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Jul 2, 2009
 
16grandkids wrote:
Has anyone ever really broken down the 46 million who are uninsured?
How many are the young who think they are bullet proof and would rather party with their money then cover themselves?
How many are illgals who are here now leaching off the system and costing everyone of us dearly?
And how many just wish not to be covered cause they get medical by other means?
So where does that leave us,how many really are under insured?

As to making a profit, that's the name of the game, if one couldn't be profitable from a profession he or she picked, why go into it at all?
I agree health care needs some type of reform, but everything uncle sh*t for brains gets involved in cost us three to four times more then the liars in government tell us up front.
Agree with all. Most are uninsured or under insured by choice. If you can't truly afford it you are covered. I have friends that constantly complain that the husband's company doesn't provide health insurance, and wah wah they can't afford to buy it themselves. It was going to cost $1000 a month. 1) I don't believe that. You can get catastrophic for much cheaper. 2) They have the BEST of everything. RV, new cars, car bought for 16 year old son, shop like crazy wife, best of all food, boat... on and on. They have two kids, suck it up. Sell the freaking RV
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Jul 2, 2009
 
Say What wrote:
With the colapse of our economy we learned that without government controls and oversight, greed takes over in those industries where huge profits can be made. So it is with the health care industry. There's still profit to be made by doctors, hospitals, medical supply and drug companies, as well as decent wages for everyone working in the health care industry. It all just needs to be controlled so that private corporations don't bleed the system to death.
very, very, very, very, very good comment! did I say excellent? helpful? brilliant? agree? Sure, but what's wrong with you - it wasn't funny!
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Jul 2, 2009
 
Astounded wrote:
<quoted text>
Holy Chit! I don't want every Tom, Dick and Harriet to be deciding what my health care plan is to be. Obama is the smartest president we have had in a long time and if he can't figure it out then no one can. Ours is not a do-it-yourself government!
I agree in general. But it takes lots of people to figure it out. It is also not a let-Obama-do-it government. I like him "well enough" to coin a phrase. But I reserve the right to disagree with him, and I do not wait around for his decision. On the other hand, trying to give ultimatums to him, or Congress, is silly!- especially from the relatively powerless left, that can ruin, but never rule. The right-wing extremists can both ruin, and rule - because they control the gOP. You sound level-headed enough to have some good suggestions yourself - and he has asked for suggestions. Mine is to include both a public option and coop option for health insurance - and have single-payer government programs mandated for children and for the elderly - oops, folks over 62, probably. for college students - why not have meetings of college students, to make suggestions after hearings and discussions - they ought to be grown up enough to think about their own health insurance! I'd have mandated health insurance for young people up to age l8, with options after that - to buy in to a continuation of a public program, to join with parents' insurance, to get their own insurance or - probably most important - to participate in devising their own types of insurance - with big pools of colege students, and college age young people - say l8-25, to include graduate school and/or early work years. Make them learn about this stuff, both from a public policy point of view, and from a what am I going to do point of view. It would be good for them - they need more pressure on them to be informed citizens. As for financing - that's easy. Tax stuff that is bad for our health.
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Jul 2, 2009
 
Apex Mom wrote:
<quoted text>
Agree with all. Most are uninsured or under insured by choice. If you can't truly afford it you are covered. I have friends that constantly complain that the husband's company doesn't provide health insurance, and wah wah they can't afford to buy it themselves. It was going to cost $1000 a month. 1) I don't believe that. You can get catastrophic for much cheaper. 2) They have the BEST of everything. RV, new cars, car bought for 16 year old son, shop like crazy wife, best of all food, boat... on and on. They have two kids, suck it up. Sell the freaking RV
Then if they get sick or injured and go to an emergency room, which has to care for them, and can't pay the bill, then the hospital will add a bit to the bil of every other patient there, and insurance companies will ad it to their premiums, to pay for those irrsponsible people. It is like having a crack house next door - you don't approve, but there needs to be some government action to get them to clean up, or the whole neighborhood will pay the price. Unless you want these folks to die? I don't mind a provision that allows hospitals to seize certain assets for non-payment of bills. How far do you think all those assets would go in case of a terrible car accident?- and if the folks you refer to are irresponsible, isn't it possible they would be irresponsible drivers, too, and be responsible for the accident themselves, and maybe likely to cause one?
Chris

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Jul 2, 2009
 
16grandkids wrote:
Has anyone ever really broken down the 46 million who are uninsured?
How many are the young who think they are bullet proof and would rather party with their money then cover themselves?
How many are illgals who are here now leaching off the system and costing everyone of us dearly?
And how many just wish not to be covered cause they get medical by other means?
So where does that leave us,how many really are under insured?
As to making a profit, that's the name of the game, if one couldn't be profitable from a profession he or she picked, why go into it at all?
I agree health care needs some type of reform, but everything uncle sh*t for brains gets involved in cost us three to four times more then the liars in government tell us up front.
Fact is..nobody is really interested in tackling the problem....costs/pricing.. The fed, the state, or the insurance companies. They just raise the premiums to cover the costs.
progressive

Lamoni, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Jul 2, 2009
 
I still disagree with we the people, but find him/her mostly less offensive than many of the other extremists. U think I did a judgeit of interesting on one comment - something about doing more individaul research (though I don't think that just asking a few pals their opinions counts as research!
Apex Mom

Morrisville, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Jul 2, 2009
 
progressive wrote:
<quoted text> Then if they get sick or injured and go to an emergency room, which has to care for them, and can't pay the bill, then the hospital will add a bit to the bil of every other patient there, and insurance companies will ad it to their premiums, to pay for those irrsponsible people. It is like having a crack house next door - you don't approve, but there needs to be some government action to get them to clean up, or the whole neighborhood will pay the price. Unless you want these folks to die? I don't mind a provision that allows hospitals to seize certain assets for non-payment of bills. How far do you think all those assets would go in case of a terrible car accident?- and if the folks you refer to are irresponsible, isn't it possible they would be irresponsible drivers, too, and be responsible for the accident themselves, and maybe likely to cause one?
Well that was kind of my point. They are being brazenly irresponsible. And they do drive up our health care costs. If they had at least catastrophic a car accident would be covered, I assume. What are you suggesting, that we somehow force them to purchase insurance by law? Somewhat like you can't drive without car insurance? I'm open to that with some discussion of how it could be implemented. But for us to premptively pay for them, no.
going to far

Chico, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Jul 2, 2009
 
progressive wrote:
<quoted text> Tax stuff that is bad for our health.
Stuff that is not good for you like tea, coffee, salt, sugar, white flower. Who makes those decisions and where do you draw the line?
going to far

Chico, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Jul 2, 2009
 
progressive wrote:
<quoted text> Then if they get sick or injured and go to an emergency room, which has to care for them, and can't pay the bill, then the hospital will add a bit to the bil of every other patient there, and insurance companies will ad it to their premiums, to pay for those irrsponsible people. It is like having a crack house next door - you don't approve, but there needs to be some government action to get them to clean up, or the whole neighborhood will pay the price. Unless you want these folks to die? I don't mind a provision that allows hospitals to seize certain assets for non-payment of bills. How far do you think all those assets would go in case of a terrible car accident?- and if the folks you refer to are irresponsible, isn't it possible they would be irresponsible drivers, too, and be responsible for the accident themselves, and maybe likely to cause one?
What you are describing is has caused many hospitals in California to go bankrupt, due in large part to unlawful immigration. They are a great many of the irresponsible people you refer to.
Budd

Bangkok, Thailand

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Jul 2, 2009
 
50% of all people who file for Bankruptcy are doing so because of medical bills. Many of those people had health insurance. If you are happy with America's health care system....you just haven't gotten sick enough yet.

http://allnurses.com/nursing-news/medical-bil...
Publius2

Chico, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Jul 2, 2009
 
Yes, why should profit be a motive for healthcare? Why would that matter? Doctors, nurses and caretakers should simply donate their time, education and resources for the good of the masses. And shouldn't companies that do the research and development for cures to diseases etc. share their wonderful discoveries with everyone? They don't need patents. After all those boys down at Genentech don't need to make a profit. Isn't it a Constitutional right for everyone to get free medical care?
What can America do for me?
[The stupidity of it all].

Since: Jan 08

Paradise

ISP: Chico, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Jul 2, 2009
 
jacksmith wrote:
But 50 million Americans don’t even have any healthcare coverage. And at least 200 million of you with insurance could not get in to see your private insurance plans doctors in 2 or 3 days, even if your life depended on it.
Medicare is going to be our new health insurance plan? Medicare is poorly managed and will be broke by 2017. Let’s say that Medicare did work, there are roughly 800,000 doctors in the U.S, 40% of those are GPs. Now if your numbers of the uninsured are right, you provide another 47,000,000 people access to those doctors, there will be approximately 150 patients more per doctor, on average, of course in large cities the situation will be much worse. Do you think this will help speed up your wait time?

The 47 million uninsured is bogus as well. 10 million of those are illegal aliens, there are about 17 million that make over $50 k/year but choose not to buy health insurance, that leaves approx 20million, many of those qualify for Medicaid or medical, whatever, but choose not to apply.

Profit motive is a good thing. Compare the consumer goods produced in the U.S.S.R compared to goods produced in a free market system where there is competition and yes, the evil profit motive. I would prefer to be operated on by a surgeon who is concerned with building his practice and making money, he is motivated to be the best surgeon that he can be so that he can make a lot of money. Rather than a surgeon who can never exceed a certain point in his practice, where is the motivation to improve.

I have lived in a country with socialized medicine and I do live here now paying for my own insurance. Even with the flaws, yes some reform is needed, I will take this system over socialized medicine any time.
Would you like us to alert you when someone adds a comment?
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 21 - 40 of203
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Install the Topix Community Toolbar

Never miss another reply to your comments, no matter where you are on the web.

Daily Horoscope for January 5

Taurus

Everything seems to be getting under your skin at the moment, but this is no excuse to lose your temper, and you know it. Better by far to be discreet and plough on steadily, without looking to the left or right. If you keep your feet on the ground and don't get discouraged, there are definitely fair winds that will blow you along. It's just a question of finding the right balance between confidence and commonsense.

Get your Horoscope »