Rubio pushes back at contraception rules under health care law

papist claptrap! No citizen should have their medical procedures and prescriptions limited by a cult headed by a hitler youth member!

Sheik Yerbouti wrote:

papist claptrap! No citizen should have their medical procedures and prescriptions limited by a cult headed by a hitler youth member!

Claptrap indeed.

No one's having them limited, bonehead.

This is a first amendment violation on part of the administration.

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Claptrap indeed.
No one's having them limited, bonehead.
This is a first amendment violation on part of the administration.

aaaawwwwhhhh whats wrong.... you learning you cathardos arent well liked

America would be better off taking orders from Rome and Jesus.

FREE LIGHT OF CATHOLICISM wrote:

America would be better off taking orders from Rome and Jesus.

In a new August 17, 2009 Maddow Show segment, Rachel Maddow and Jeff Sharlet discuss, among many new revelations, the disturbing fact that the "Christian Embassy" scandal, propelled by a complaint to the Department of Defense from the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, was investigated by a Pentagon Inspector General who is in fact a Family member.

The Family, also known as "The Fellowship", is a secretive fundamentalist Washington DC ministry which runs the National Prayer Breakfast and Bible study groups attended by numerous US Senators and Congress members, wields global influence, and celebrates the leadership lessons of Hitler, Lenin, and Mao.

Over the course of the summer of 2009, Washington's Family-run "C Street House" has become notorious as a string of sex scandals have engulfed national GOP political figures who live at, have lived at, or attended Bible study classes at the secretive former convent turned church-cum cheap-rent high end boarding house: Senator John Ensign, former Congressman Charles "Chip" Pickering, and South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford.

By far the story has been driven, first, by Jeff Sharlet, who wrote the 2008 book The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at The Heart Of American Power, which followed Sharlet's 2003 Harper's expose Jesus Plus Nothing. But MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, who has pursued breaking new aspects of the festering scandal with a long-term dedication only rarely seen in mainstream media news coverage, has played an invaluable role in giving the mafia-like "Family" widespread public exposure.

Maddow's willingness to cover the story of The Family and the C Street House in an ongoing manner, week to week over the summer, implicitly indicts much of mainstream news coverage as suffering from collective attention-deficit disorder; given the level of international, geopolitical influence The Family apparently wields, its members' penchant for describing their group as a Christian "mafia", and in light of Family head Doug Coe's... MSNBC's Maddow Show Propels Growing DC "Christian Mafia ...
Aug 19, 2009 ... In a new August 17, 2009 Maddow Show segment, Rachel Maddow and ... members' penchant for describing their group as a Christian "mafia",...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-wilson/ms ...- 298k

First you get down on your knees,
Fiddle with your rosaries,
Bow your head with great respect,
And genuflect, genuflect, genuflect!

Do whatever steps you want, if
You have cleared them with the Pontiff.
Everybody say his own
Kyrie eleison,
Doin' the Vatican Rag.

Get in line in that processional,
Step into that small confessional,
There, the guy who's got religion'll
Tell you if your sin's original.
If it is, try playin' it safer,
Drink the wine and chew the wafer,
Two, four, six, eight,
Time to transubstantiate!

So get down upon your knees,
Fiddle with your rosaries,
Bow your head with great respect,
And genuflect, genuflect, genuflect!

Make a cross on your abdomen,
When in Rome do like a Roman,
Ave Maria,
Gee it's good to see ya,
Gettin' ecstatic an'
Sorta dramatic an'
Doin' the Vatican Rag!

Sheik Yerbouti wrote:

First you get down on your knees,
Fiddle with your rosaries,
Bow your head with great respect,
And genuflect, genuflect, genuflect!
Do whatever steps you want, if
You have cleared them with the Pontiff.
Everybody say his own
Kyrie eleison,
Doin' the Vatican Rag.
Get in line in that processional,
Step into that small confessional,
There, the guy who's got religion'll
Tell you if your sin's original.
If it is, try playin' it safer,
Drink the wine and chew the wafer,
Two, four, six, eight,
Time to transubstantiate!
So get down upon your knees,
Fiddle with your rosaries,
Bow your head with great respect,
And genuflect, genuflect, genuflect!
Make a cross on your abdomen,
When in Rome do like a Roman,
Ave Maria,
Gee it's good to see ya,
Gettin' ecstatic an'
Sorta dramatic an'
Doin' the Vatican Rag!

Wrap your head in rag
Put a bomb into a bag
Walk right up to a group of people
Or throw it at a church's steeple

Get down on your knees and pray
That Allah will grant you many virgins
For doing this explosive perversion!

Lilith_SatansWhore wrote:

<quoted text>aaaawwwwhhhh whats wrong.... you learning you cathardos arent well liked

Good! Jesus said to rejoice when you are persecuted and the world would hate us because it hated Him first.

We're in good company!

FREE LIGHT OF CATHOLICISM wrote:

America would be better off taking orders from Rome and Jesus.

If we took orders from the Vatican, we'd all be Nazi Brownshirts.

FREE LIGHT OF CATHOLICISM wrote:

America would be better off taking orders from Rome and Jesus.

Unless you're an alter boy...but nice troll.

“If an employee wants birth control, that worker could simply pay for it themselves or just choose to work elsewhere,” he said.“What it does forbid is having government force religious entities to provide them.”

Perhaps Catholics and other religious yahoos that object to contraceptives should not take jobs nor be offered jobs where contraceptives are covered by insurance? we certainly would not want to lead them down the wrong path...right? And since they are so objected it would be hypocritical for them to work where contraceptives are offered...correct?

DayStorm wrote:

<quoted text>
Good! Jesus said to rejoice when you are persecuted and the world would hate us because it hated Him first.
We're in good company!

Yes and.....One night the big bad wolf, who dearly loved to eat fat little piggies, came along and saw the first little pig in his house of straw. He said "Let me in, Let me in, little pig or I'll huff and I'll puff and I'll blow your house in!"

"Not by the hair of my chinny chin chin", said the little pig.

I thought I would add to the story telling, hope you enjoyed it!

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Claptrap indeed.
No one's having them limited, bonehead.
This is a first amendment violation on part of the administration.

Simple. The Catholic church accepts no tax payer money and away they go. Let them float their own boat. As a woman and a tax payer I do not want the misogynists to have one thin dime of mine. Problem solved!

Morgana 9 wrote:

“If an employee wants birth control, that worker could simply pay for it themselves or just choose to work elsewhere,” he said.“What it does forbid is having government force religious entities to provide them.”
Perhaps Catholics and other religious yahoos that object to contraceptives should not take jobs nor be offered jobs where contraceptives are covered by insurance? we certainly would not want to lead them down the wrong path...right? And since they are so objected it would be hypocritical for them to work where contraceptives are offered...correct?

You just don't get it do you?

Morgana 9 wrote:

<quoted text>
Simple. The Catholic church accepts no tax payer money and away they go. Let them float their own boat. As a woman and a tax payer I do not want the misogynists to have one thin dime of mine. Problem solved!

You clearly have no idea how much in social services expenses the government (fed/state/local) saves via it's current working relationship with religious based charities and social service organizations.

Millions.

Here's a good read on the subject if you're so inclined.

http://www.calgaryherald.com/opinion/Gerson+O...

Morgana 9 wrote:

<quoted text>
Simple. The Catholic church accepts no tax payer money and away they go. Let them float their own boat. As a woman and a tax payer I do not want the misogynists to have one thin dime of mine. Problem solved!

Also, receiving money from the Government doesn't negate First Amendnment nor any other) rights for the recipient. Simple, as you said.

pupsilicious wrote:

<quoted text>You just don't get it do you?

I get it perfectly. The Male phallic worshipping institute known as the Catholic church would like the freedom to discriminate and practice misogyny. Their hatred of women other than a virgin subservient twit knows no bounds.

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
You clearly have no idea how much in social services expenses the government (fed/state/local) saves via it's current working relationship with religious based charities and social service organizations.
Millions.
Here's a good read on the subject if you're so inclined.
http://www.calgaryherald.com/opinion/Gerson+O...

And all they ask in lieu of their so called services is the right to discriminate and practice their misogynistic under the guise of OUR constitution. Let them float their own boat. I as a woman tax payer do not owe them one thin dime. I do not want to support a male phallic worshipping cult who gets their rocks off allowing a woman/girl who could be saved to lay and die simply because she is pregnant. Not one dime.

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
Also, receiving money from the Government doesn't negate First Amendnment nor any other) rights for the recipient. Simple, as you said.

Nor does it allow them the freedom to discriminate or practice misogyny under the guise of male based /male preference religion.

Morgana 9 wrote:

<quoted text>
I get it perfectly. The Male phallic worshipping institute known as the Catholic church would like the freedom to discriminate and practice misogyny. Their hatred of women other than a virgin subservient twit knows no bounds.

Well, you just demonstrated that you don't grasp the issue at hand.

Same old "Johnny One-Note" stuff from you here.

Hopefully, Obama doesn't decide unilaterally that your First Amendment rights don't exist.