Texas Defies Obama Admin., Bars Abortion Providers from Medicaid

Annnnnndddddddddd you would once again be wrong. Lingo is a transformation of contextual language. It's not the same as making up words.

bluestreak prime wrote:

<quoted text>
Naw, it's called lingo.

The director didn't consider it a musical.

UR BS wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you kidding?
Not just the ators, JodieFoster, call i a Musical in the trailer but the commentatort also calls it a musical. The link you provied was for the trailer for the film ad it is repeatedly refered to as a Musical. So cry all you like but it was a Musical.
So sorry again but as usual you are wrong.

cpeter1313 wrote:

Annnnnndddddddddd you would once again be wrong. Lingo is a transformation of contextual language. It's not the same as making up words.
<quoted text>

You should watch a few seasons of "Seinfeld," instead of "Glee" or whatever other mush fits your, uh, pseudointellectual sensibilities.

UR BS wrote:

<quoted text>
So sorry again but as usual you are wrong.

I wonder if he has ever been wrong and actually admitted it? I've heard of a need to save face, but this tenacity on his part to endorse certain viewpoints even after being proven wrong, I mean, damn!

Seinfeld was a tedious, over-rated hipster show, watched mostly by people who thought they were "cool". I don't watch "glee" for the same reason I didn't watch "fame"--teenagers are boring.

I watch a few cooking shows, Torchwood, early CSI before they introduced the maudlin love affair, original twilight zone episodes, etc. I rarely watch anything on a regular basis.

bluestreak prime wrote:

<quoted text>
You should watch a few seasons of "Seinfeld," instead of "Glee" or whatever other mush fits your, uh, pseudointellectual sensibilities.

cpeter1313 wrote:

Seinfeld was a tedious, over-rated hipster show, watched mostly by people who thought they were "cool".
<quoted text>

And yet it was a top 10 show. The people have chosen, you're outvoted, gramps.

cpeter1313 wrote:

Sorry, I just figured "fagment" was just one of your hundreds of misspellings. I didn't realize you were making up words, kinda like "gay array".
<quoted text>

See, you are wrong again, and your right about being "sorry". You are the sorriest piece of crap I know. To late for the admission though. You already pissed too many real people off.

If I use 'fashion array', does that get you closer to comprehension of the term, or does it do like everything else-go right over your pointed little head?

cpeter1313 wrote:

Of course you are not of my species; I'm human.
Honey.
<quoted text>

Wrong again! You came from a test tube of blackish slime-probably a Freshman chemistry experiment gone wrong. And I told you not to call me honey, dip doo-doo.

cpeter1313 wrote:

The director didn't consider it a musical.
<quoted text>

And your link to the director calling it not a musical?

I posted a link that shows it as a musical. It was called a musical in the only post you provided which was the trailer for the movie and yet you still claim that you know more than anyone else about it and now you can read the director's mind.

Dang petey, you can't be just in your 50's as you claim. I mean you claim to be some kind of doctor, an actor, an activist, a gay rights protector, and now an expert on movies as well.

Talk about Narcissism!

bluestreak prime wrote:

<quoted text>
I wonder if he has ever been wrong and actually admitted it? I've heard of a need to save face, but this tenacity on his part to endorse certain viewpoints even after being proven wrong, I mean, damn!

I would venture to say no.
His Narcissism would never let him admit to being wrong even when faced with irrefutable evidence that he is wrong.

cpeter1313 wrote:

To vicious posts? From from you rednecks. You;re just transacting at the 12yo level, spewing the equivalent of "poopyhead."
I'm not looking for your visitation; I don't have to prove YOUR point, idiot. Just how inbred ARE you?
<quoted text>

"TWO" vicious post, not "TO". You are such a dumb butt, You can't read and yet you talk on-and-on about how intelligent you are.

You don't have to prove my point, because you can't. You can't even prove your own post, and I don't have to "cite" my post material-that's a one-way street position with me.

And speaking of inbred's, it is a well known fact that there are more inbred's within the gay population than in the state of Indianus' straight population. 2 of 3 inbred's have filed for a marriage license in Indianapples alone from 2008 through 2011.

Your application was denied on the basis you failed to hold your relationship with Rafeal together. Do you still slobber all over the front of your Leotards?

cpeter1313 wrote:

Casablanca was based on an unproduced play; nobody in the cast knew how it was supposed to turn out. Not to mention that one of the biggest gripes among authors is that movies made from their works rarely are faithful to the source material. Until near the end of shooting, bergman had no idea who she would be ending up with.
As for knowing what is going on, one of the most famous stories bogart told about the movie is that he had one scene to shoot that day; the director had him walk out, look to his side, and slowly nod. He had NO idea what it was about; it turned out to the the crucial moment when he indicated the band should play "La Marseille". Many of the extras in that scene, btw, were french; upon hearing the song begin, many were openly weeping as they sang. People commented on the acting but there was none involved; it was genuine sadness and patriotism.
Movie-making is not as cut and dried as you think. Even if a star accepts a written, full script, anything can change. You should read up on the nightmare that was "apocalypse now", or anything directed by kubrick. The transformation of "doctor stranelove" is more interesting than the movie itself at times.
<quoted text>

What-"bogart", "french", "kubrick" "apocalypse now", "doctor strangelove", and "No", and you call yourself a "screech therapist" and spelling cop? It's that "inbreed" thing-it's catching.

cpeter1313 wrote:

The director didn't consider it a musical.
<quoted text>

The director wasn't gay.

UR BS wrote:

<quoted text>
As to the proof reding I won't waste my timefor someone like you. A person that has some worth would be another story perhaps but you, no.
Besides you can take it however you like. You always invent things and accuse peopl of saying things they never said, so why would the actual words written be of any concern to you?

Funny thing is petey continues to profess how intelligent he is and yet he fond it hard to figure out what you were saying over a misspelled word or two?

Hell who hasn't seen that thing where the words are purposely jumbled and yet can be read and understood? So the question then becomes can petey read? Something I have been asking over and over again and I haven't gotten an answer. Which leads me to believe he can't read because if he could then he would have answered the question.

I doubt his simple mind got that.

In other words he couldn't read the question so he had no idea what was asked.:-D

cpeter1313 wrote:

Yeah, 3yo's say that all the time.
Do you buy your melodrama by the pound or the handy 50-gallon drum?
<quoted text>

Did I offend?

A little too personal for you?

If it meant nothing to you why reply? Should've just brushed that one off seems you're not 100% sold on your own belief.

cpeter1313 wrote:

Casablanca was based on an unproduced play; nobody in the cast knew how it was supposed to turn out. Not to mention that one of the biggest gripes among authors is that movies made from their works rarely are faithful to the source material. Until near the end of shooting, bergman had no idea who she would be ending up with.
As for knowing what is going on, one of the most famous stories bogart told about the movie is that he had one scene to shoot that day; the director had him walk out, look to his side, and slowly nod. He had NO idea what it was about; it turned out to the the crucial moment when he indicated the band should play "La Marseille". Many of the extras in that scene, btw, were french; upon hearing the song begin, many were openly weeping as they sang. People commented on the acting but there was none involved; it was genuine sadness and patriotism.
Movie-making is not as cut and dried as you think. Even if a star accepts a written, full script, anything can change. You should read up on the nightmare that was "apocalypse now", or anything directed by kubrick. The transformation of "doctor stranelove" is more interesting than the movie itself at times.
<quoted text>

Let's refresh shall we...

""Casablanca" was written as it was being filmed; nobody knew if it was a romance, a film noir, or a war picture."
http://www.topix.net/forum/state/tx/TNVRGVL53...

Your exact words and you are saying that "nobody" knew. Now you're saying "nobody in the cast" a tad backpeddling on your part, but you've been doing that this entire thread.

Casablanca was a play period. It was a completed work that hadn't gone into production on stage. The screenplay was unfinished, yes, but the story itself, what it was based on did exist and people involved knew what it was about. You need to not completely buy in to those DVD commentaries haha.(just a joke, no door opened...)

As for filmmaking, when a script gets changed or revised the actors do receive those revisions especially scenes involving their character or as I said scenes that affect their character. They have to know what is going on in order to portray their character and express the right emotion for their scenes. Hell even if they don't receive a last minute revision the director will tell them what has just happened and how they should portray the current action.

I know how much work goes into filmmaking. I'm producing an independent feature this summer. No, it's not a musical.:-D

So was Three's Company. Now explain to me how THAT was great entertainment.

Poor pathetic sheep, equating popularity with quality.

bluestreak prime wrote:

<quoted text>
And yet it was a top 10 show. The people have chosen, you're outvoted, gramps.

"Fashion Array" is the name of several clothing stores.

Feel free to explain your reference, if you can.

PATRIOT wrote:

<quoted text>
See, you are wrong again, and your right about being "sorry". You are the sorriest piece of crap I know. To late for the admission though. You already pissed too many real people off.
If I use 'fashion array', does that get you closer to comprehension of the term, or does it do like everything else-go right over your pointed little head?

Oh, please, honey. My parents were good catholics--nothing but natural insemination for them, and plenty of it.

PATRIOT wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrong again! You came from a test tube of blackish slime-probably a Freshman chemistry experiment gone wrong. And I told you not to call me honey, dip doo-doo.

It was a tv interview; I don't recall which show. As I recall, others disagreed with him then.

UR BS wrote:

<quoted text>
And your link to the director calling it not a musical?
I posted a link that shows it as a musical. It was called a musical in the only post you provided which was the trailer for the movie and yet you still claim that you know more than anyone else about it and now you can read the director's mind.
Dang petey, you can't be just in your 50's as you claim. I mean you claim to be some kind of doctor, an actor, an activist, a gay rights protector, and now an expert on movies as well.
Talk about Narcissism!