Liberty's Anti-Smoking Vote Raises Concerns for Businesses - WDAF

Judged:

1

1

1

azmac wrote:

<quoted text>
http://tobaccodocuments.org/rjr/519360382-038...

Judged:

1

1

1

discusseded wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope. If you are "forced to go outside and smoke" it is not by anything anyone else has imposed on you. A law that says "no smoking inside" DOES NOT say "Smoke outside". The only force involved there is the inability to refrain from smoking. That is addiction, buddy. Twist any way you want to.
You folks keep screaming that "smoking is a choice". Well, if thats so, then smoking outside is a choice and not something that ANYONE has forced on you. Grow a pair and take responsibility for your bizarre behavior.

Judged:

1

1

1

azmac wrote:

<quoted text>
How does it feel to help destroy the constitution. Supporting the loss of private property rights, Supporting kids being able to buy cigarettes at any age. Supporting the loss of business, loss of jobs. How does it feel knowing you helped put kids and families on the street. How does it feel to know you help create hate among people. You and your kind are very unamerican. You and your kind are helping destroy every thing our forefathers fought and died for. You want a communist country you should move to one.

Judged:

1

1

just candid wrote:

<quoted text>"azmac" Try and get help before it's to late. You sound like you're a total nut case, are you?

Judged:

1

1

1

azmac wrote:

<quoted text>
Do I have to put all the links up again to prove what I say. I know you people can not retain to much for very long.

Judged:

1

just candid wrote:

<quoted text>"azmac" Try and get help before it's to late. You sound like you're a total nut case, are you?

Judged:

1

1

just candid wrote:

<quoted text>"azmac" Try and get help before it's to late. You sound like you're a total nut case, are you?

DRM wrote:

<quoted text>
You have first hand knowlge on this subject, why do you ask what you already know?

Judged:

1

1

1

discusseded wrote:

<quoted text>
Given that you think posting a link to an RJR document is "proof" that nicotine isn't really addictive, I'd say YOUR retention just might have migrated a little bit.
Ever hear the words "Racketeering-Influenced or Corrupt Organization"? Or, maybe, "Master Tobacco Settlement"?
You lack the credibility to claim to "prove" ANYthing, no matter how much you post and how long you proclaim relevance and interpretation.
It may be exasperating for you that a long history of misrepresentation, delusion, and simply irrational assertions of meaning have surprisingly failed to persuade anyone who wasn't already in lockstep with your fantasies, but that's simply the way life goes sometimes.
Get over it.

Judged:

1

1

1

azmac wrote:

<quoted text>
The tobacco trial was a farce, the tobacco companies were guilty before the trial started. The tobacco companies were not allowed to give any evidence in their favor. As far as your side goes, talk about lies. Every thing they say is a lie. How can one thing be the cause of every disease. Just look around here in Topix and see there is a new article almost every week of smoking causing some thing else. Why wasn't all this around when I grew up when almost all smoked. How in the hell does smokers hold all the longevity records if smoking is so deadly. How come 2/3 of all cancer deaths are non smokers. Smoking bans are here to destroy private property rights and they have done a very good job at it. It is ignorant people like you who are helping destroy this country. This country will fall very shortly, maybe before the end of the year. Hope you like a government run by the UN with no constitution. The constitution is just about gone now. The government no longer follows it. That means you no longer have any rights.

Judged:

1

1

1

azmac wrote:

This will be my last post on here. No longer have the time to play with idiots. I have said what i needed to say. If some listen great, the ones who did not, OH WELL.

just candid wrote:

It's a matter of fact: Most drunks, degenerates, other lowlife riffraff and their ilk smoke cigarettes.

discusseded wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope. If you are "forced to go outside and smoke" it is not by anything anyone else has imposed on you. A law that says "no smoking inside" DOES NOT say "Smoke outside". The only force involved there is the inability to refrain from smoking. That is addiction, buddy. Twist any way you want to.
You folks keep screaming that "smoking is a choice". Well, if thats so, then smoking outside is a choice and not something that ANYONE has forced on you. Grow a pair and take responsibility for your bizarre behavior.

just candid wrote:

Most riffraff are cigarette smokers, are you one?

PreachingToTheGarbage wrote:

<quoted text>80% of the riffraff are Obese Non Smokers, Are you one ?

Freedom wrote:

<quoted text>
Tell us oh hateful one...what kind of person mocks those they seek to oppress?
History knows your kind.

BleuJei wrote:

<quoted text>
Let's not forget the alcohol consumption ;-)

just candid wrote:

<quoted text> Once again B.J., you are barking up the wrong tree. You seem to forget numerious studies have shown smokers tend to drink more than non-smokers. Have a nice day. >;~)

BleuJei wrote:

<quoted text>
I suppose a guilty conscience needs NO accusing, hmmm, JC?
And you have a nice day as well ;-)~

just candid wrote:

<quoted text> Once again B.J., you are barking up the wrong tree. You seem to forget numerious studies have shown smokers tend to drink more than non-smokers. Have a nice day. >;~)