It's the Guns, Stupid

Confucioulicious wrote:

<quoted text>
It's been weeks if not months since I've been in here and you're still being a troll.
You don't agree with those in favor of gun ownership but you summed up your response in 4 posts. Now you just stick your head in to be combative apparently. With you it's a personality thing now and not a productive arguement or discussion. You don't like those that support gun rights and since you could go no further you're finding yourself slashing tires at this point. Right on. Too bad the law states we are allowed firearms.
After months of spitting your nonsense in here guess what....you STILL lose. LOL!!!

Heeeyyyyy!!

Long time no see.

How's life been treating you?

Gottaliv wrote:

<quoted text>
The first link shows on first chart that sexual assult peaked in 2001 and has steadily declined since then.
"...so horrendous". Stop being melodramatic.

LIAR:

Trend in sexual assault

Sexual assault victims, by month, 1995-2006

Reported sexual assaults have increased by an average of 4% each year since 1995.

The number of recorded sexual assaults is typically highest during the months of January to March and August to November and lowest during April to July.

URL: http://www.aic.gov.au/topics/violence/sexual_... ; Last modified: 15 April 2008

© 2008 Australian Institute of Criminology

GunShowOnTheNet wrote:

<quoted text>
LIAR:
Trend in sexual assault
Sexual assault victims, by month, 1995-2006
Reported sexual assaults have increased by an average of 4% each year since 1995.
The number of recorded sexual assaults is typically highest during the months of January to March and August to November and lowest during April to July.
URL: http://www.aic.gov.au/topics/violence/sexual_... ; Last modified: 15 April 2008
© 2008 Australian Institute of Criminology

Liar...... your stats are wrong ya liar........

jack wrote:

<quoted text>
feed up...you have been shown before that our stats are " all sexual assault "
your stats are aggivated rape only
as for sexual assault...USA is the highest in the world
page 79 Table 12
http://www.unicri.it/wwd/analysis/icvs/pdf_fi...

Rapes (per capita)(most recent) by country

Showing latest available data. Rank Countries Amount (top to bottom)
#1 South Africa: 1.19538 per 1,000 people
#2 Seychelles: 0.788294 per 1,000 people

#3 Australia: 0.777999 per 1,000 people

#4 Montserrat: 0.749384 per 1,000 people
#5 Canada: 0.733089 per 1,000 people
#6 Jamaica: 0.476608 per 1,000 people
#7 Zimbabwe: 0.457775 per 1,000 people
#8 Dominica: 0.34768 per 1,000 people
#9 United States: 0.301318 per 1,000 people
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_rap_per...

SWEDE wrote:

<quoted text>Liar...... your stats are wrong ya liar........

POST SOME >PROOF< you blithering idiot.

the only stats that count.
100 percent of police state deaths, are caused by gun grabbers.

http://www.jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/deathgc.htm#d...

Highlander wrote:

<quoted text>
Heeeyyyyy!!
Long time no see.
How's life been treating you?

Stressing out. Nieghbor offered to buy my house only to have us find another house and now the neighbor looks like he's going to flake leaving us with a $5,000 deposit lost. I'm beginning to think my neighbor also belongs to the anti-gun movement by the character he's demonstrated at this point...LOL!!!!

GunShowOnTheNet wrote:

<quoted text>
POST SOME >PROOF< you blithering idiot.

Amen. You want to point at the dog crap in your yard you better make sure it's from my dog Rutherford and not the other neighbor's dog Spanky before accusing.

Always provide proof before laying out claims and accusing another of lying. No wonder it took us what....1200 plus years in recorded human history to figure out the world was not flat but round.

Highlander wrote:

<quoted text>
Have >YOU< ever communicated with jackarse412?
Have >YOU< ever presented a logical, reasoned, and cogent argument to that dickweed, only to have IT totally ignore the truth, the facts, and the reality, and instead vituperate with page after page of utter nonsense, and just blatant lies?
And anyway, why are >YOU< seemingly in support of jackarse412?
Are >YOU< ANTI-LIBERTY TOO?

I believe in reincarnation after reading your posts.

I see an 18th Century American patriot standing in the town centre with a horse whip and using as a pointer as well as making the motions with it like a conducter to illustrate your point.

Guns are here to stay in our country. They're ingrained in our culture, our belief system of freedoms and they have proved to be more beneficial than harmful. You'll have a continual stream of opposition because they can see one side of the coin as we all do but anti-gun activists never seem to flip the coin over to understand the value of such a tool. Like I said before things like barbeques would be made illegal for the same reasoning these people use against guns.'Twenty three persent of domestic fires are caused by barbeque use as well as 19 percent of in house burns to victims of this evil device not to mention finger and hand injuries caused by the inproper closing of the lid. Barbeques most often use hazardous chemicals and extremely dangerous flammable substances in order to operate such as lighter fluid which is 34% more flammable than gas and propane which can explode causing serious injury and even death. Ban barbeques! They're even painted black because of their evil nature. Ben them!!!'

Guns are a tool. Treat them like one, with respect.

Confucioulicious wrote:

<quoted text>
Stressing out. Nieghbor offered to buy my house only to have us find another house and now the neighbor looks like he's going to flake leaving us with a $5,000 deposit lost. I'm beginning to think my neighbor also belongs to the anti-gun movement by the character he's demonstrated at this point...LOL!!!!

Live and learn!

The next time, make ~sure~ the next offer agrees to put down the U$5000 as good money.

jack wrote:

<quoted text>
you must be a yank import...aussies arent as stupid
go back and check the first page of this topic

And you must be a communist-socialist subversion agent.

Confucioulicious wrote:

<quoted text>
Amen. You want to point at the dog crap in your yard you better make sure it's from my dog Rutherford and not the other neighbor's dog Spanky before accusing.

Well, there's always the 'taste test'...

Or would that be the 'sniff test?'

:-))

Confucioulicious wrote:

Always provide proof before laying out claims and accusing another of lying. No wonder it took us what....1200 plus years in recorded human history to figure out the world was not flat but round.

Yes indeed!

Old Scottish saying: If people's words were used as money, then some people would be bankrupt just by speaking!

Aye!

jack wrote:

<quoted text>
actually i have given the link to the full report for 12 mths now and i have also linked a rebutal to it...perhaps you should read it because none of my numbers are bogus, regardless how you would like it to be so
our progun political party,
http://www.shootersparty.org.au/index.php...
http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/GunLawsSudd... full text
rebuttal
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php...
“We find reductions in both gun homicide and gun suicide rates that are statistically significant, meaning that they are larger than would have been expected by mere chance,” Dr Leigh said.“Our best estimates are that the gun buyback has saved between 128 and 282 lives per year.”
http://econrsss.anu.edu.au/pdf/DP555.pdf full text

"JACK": are you using that handle in the noun or the verb sense?

Confucioulicious wrote:

<quoted text>
It's been weeks if not months since I've been in here and you're still being a troll.
You don't agree with those in favor of gun ownership but you summed up your response in 4 posts. Now you just stick your head in to be combative apparently. With you it's a personality thing now and not a productive arguement or discussion. You don't like those that support gun rights and since you could go no further you're finding yourself slashing tires at this point. Right on. Too bad the law states we are allowed firearms.
After months of spitting your nonsense in here guess what....you STILL lose. LOL!!!

So when did ya get out of the slammer?

Dr Sybil wrote:

<quoted text>
So when did ya get out of the slammer?

So, how did ya manage to sneak away from your pimp?

relax dude, I couldnt care about no Jackass, if you look at the post it mentions nothing of that

Highlander wrote:

<quoted text>
Have >YOU< ever communicated with jackarse412?
Have >YOU< ever presented a logical, reasoned, and cogent argument to that dickweed, only to have IT totally ignore the truth, the facts, and the reality, and instead vituperate with page after page of utter nonsense, and just blatant lies?
And anyway, why are >YOU< seemingly in support of jackarse412?
Are >YOU< ANTI-LIBERTY TOO?

Thats the point, if it was me getting hurt (though i heard this guy got attacked in his sleep so i dont think it would have helped having a gun), but if i was attack and had a gun of course id start firing it off, and that would undoubtly result in others getting hurt.

Highlander wrote:

<quoted text>
That's sorta wishy-washy, isn't it?
'Other people might have gotten hurt.'
Conversely: Other people might NOT have gotten hurt.
If it were >YOU< who was getting attacked, would >YOU< have stopped to think: Gee, what if other's get hurt?
Would the knife wielding idiot have afforded you the time to 'stop and consider' your actions?

No it isn't. but it depends on a lot of factors regarding arming other people, like the caliber of the gun, his skills with hit, his self control at the time. All i see is people attacking the literal statement rather then suggest, erri dunno, metal detectos before getting on the bus?

Think outside of the statements,

Watchdog wrote:

<quoted text>
So, its ok the victim died, just as long as there was no threat to the other passengers???
How bad a shot would he have had to be to miss someone trying to stab him in a bus seat?

Plant Lady wrote:

<quoted text>
YAWN...1 SHEEPLE...2 SHEEPLE...3 SHEEPLE
dang I hate these recurring bad dreams...

What do you expect, there isn't enough guns.
More guns would of changed that all around!

we need more guns
----------
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
So, General Cosgrove, what things are you going to teach these young boys
when they visit your base?

GENERAL COSGROVE:
We're going to teach them climbing, canoeing, archery and shooting.

?
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:?
Shooting! That's a bit irresponsible, isn't it?

GENERAL COSGROVE:
I don't see why, they'll be properly supervised on the rifle range.

FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
Don't you admit that this is a terribly dangerous activity to be teaching
children?

GENERAL COSGROVE:
I don't see how. We will be teaching them proper rifle discipline before

they even touch a firearm.

?
FEMALE INTERVIEWER:
But you're equipping them to become violent killers.

GENERAL COSGROVE:
Well, Ma'am, you're equipped to be a prostitute, but you're not one, are

you?

The radio went silent and the interview ended.