|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
Where Is My America wrote: <quoted text> It would be better if you would take your ideas along with your azz and move out of the USA. I am considering moving to another country because idiots like you live here. lol
|
|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
Logan wrote: <quoted text>BTW, Pres. Obama believes in all of the same things you do. President Obama wishes to take our guns, and if that is what it takes then I say 'do it'. I do not want to be the next victim of a mass shooting. Do you?
|
|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
Aussie Bob wrote: <quoted text> Yeah, about that... It's boring over here & I ran out of kangaroos to shag. So I just thought I would mosey on down & have a little political chit-chat with you redneck gun-loving bumpkins in the US. After-all you Americans are known for your fine conversational skills & I do find your honesty so much more refreshing than the lies of the Jews. I'm simply not a Nazi btw. My family sacrificed bravely to fight them off. All the while, your ancestors waited...... & waited........ & waited. Hey, I won't hold it against ya though. I have friends from Adelaide, Australia!
|
|
“O'er the land of the free ? ”
Since: Jan 09
Don't Tread On Me
|
Please wait...
Providence060109 wrote: <quoted text> I am considering moving to another country because idiots like you live here. lol The sooner , the better.
|
|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
Where Is My America wrote: <quoted text>The sooner , the better. For what? For the immediate desolution of all things America? That is the course you are definitely on. That is what makes me question your kind's sanity...you fight commonsense and vote for insanity.
|
|
“ WOOF !”
Since: Oct 10
Coolidge, AZ
|
Please wait...
Providence060109 wrote: <quoted text> President Obama wishes to take our guns, and if that is what it takes then I say 'do it'. I do not want to be the next victim of a mass shooting. Do you? So you don't believe in the Bill Of Rights, nor support the U.S. Constitution ?
|
|
Tray
Tupelo, MS
|
Providence060109 wrote: <quoted text> President Obama wishes to take our guns, and if that is what it takes then I say 'do it'. I do not want to be the next victim of a mass shooting. Do you? Well being that I carry maybe I will not be a victim but the guy the attacker fears. Just when is Obama planing to show up at my door wanting my guns? Just how many can he carry at one time? How many trips is he planning on making to carry my guns off? What makes you think I would stand by and watch someone rob me? Do you fear death? Take care of yourself, eat right, don't chase wild women, don't drink, don't do drugs guess what. YOU STILL GOING TO DIE. You were born to die, we all are it just depends if it happens on your feet or on your knees.
|
|
“ WOOF !”
Since: Oct 10
Coolidge, AZ
|
Please wait...
Tray wrote: <quoted text> Well being that I carry maybe I will not be a victim but the guy the attacker fears. Just when is Obama planing to show up at my door wanting my guns? Just how many can he carry at one time? How many trips is he planning on making to carry my guns off? What makes you think I would stand by and watch someone rob me? Do you fear death? Take care of yourself, eat right, don't chase wild women, don't drink, don't do drugs guess what. YOU STILL GOING TO DIE. You were born to die, we all are it just depends if it happens on your feet or on your knees. I could say a few things about that. LOL from my cold dead hands.... SUPPORT THE SECOND AMENDMENT ! SUPPORT TEH U.S. CONSTITUTION ! ALL OF IT !!!
|
|
|
|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
Tray wrote: <quoted text> Well being that I carry maybe I will not be a victim but the guy the attacker fears. Just when is Obama planing to show up at my door wanting my guns? Just how many can he carry at one time? How many trips is he planning on making to carry my guns off? What makes you think I would stand by and watch someone rob me? Do you fear death? Take care of yourself, eat right, don't chase wild women, don't drink, don't do drugs guess what. YOU STILL GOING TO DIE. You were born to die, we all are it just depends if it happens on your feet or on your knees. Dear person, Obama will not show up on our doorsteps, no one will, they will take them directly from D.C., so please, stop being dramatic... And how many of these shootings that have occurred has any of the victims taken the shooter down? No, they come at him, he kills them. Arrogance is death.
|
|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
FaFoxy wrote: <quoted text> So you don't believe in the Bill Of Rights, nor support the U.S. Constitution ? I believe in them both, FaFoxy (chuckles), but I do not support the idea that people can shoot innocent Americans because the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution gives us the freedom to bear arms...we have the right to possess weapons for self-defense, and hunting game, or for shooting at targets, etc., but never were we given the priviledge or right to shoot random people at will. If you consider that 'a right' then you are one sick person.
|
|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
Tray wrote: <quoted text> Well being that I carry maybe I will not be a victim but the guy the attacker fears. Just when is Obama planing to show up at my door wanting my guns? Just how many can he carry at one time? How many trips is he planning on making to carry my guns off? What makes you think I would stand by and watch someone rob me? Do you fear death? Take care of yourself, eat right, don't chase wild women, don't drink, don't do drugs guess what. YOU STILL GOING TO DIE. You were born to die, we all are it just depends if it happens on your feet or on your knees. I think I should turn you in as the next suspect if a mass shooting ever occurs in your area. You are weird.
|
|
“ WOOF !”
Since: Oct 10
Coolidge, AZ
|
Please wait...
Providence060109 wrote: <quoted text> I believe in them both, FaFoxy (chuckles), but I do not support the idea that people can shoot innocent Americans because the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution gives us the freedom to bear arms...we have the right to possess weapons for self-defense, and hunting game, or for shooting at targets, etc., but never were we given the priviledge or right to shoot random people at will. If you consider that 'a right' then you are one sick person. I never said that.
|
|
Since: Dec 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Providence060109 wrote: I was so angry when I heard the news of the shooting in Colorado. Our nation needs to reform our gun laws, or outlaw them completely if we cannot use them properly and in a civil manner. They need to raise the age of when one can possess a deadly weapon such as the gun the shooter used to kill those people, and forbid private pawn shops and internet businesses from selling these weapons. We need dramatic reform there, and less elsewhere. Notice that every one of these mass shootings occurred in "gun free zones". Only law abiding Americans obeys the law. Criminals don't, which is why they are criminals. And the one thing that all criminals have in common is that they prefer unarmed victims. By your belief, these incidents did not happen since the guns were already illegal to be there. So either you must admit that you think they did not occur, or that your gun restriction laws are a failure. If you legislate guns out of existence, you can be certain that these crimes will become commonplace everywhere. Drugs are illegal. Yet they are easily available, even in the most guarded, policed areas such as our nation's prisons. While these tragedies do occur, they happen far less frequently than they did during the Clinton gun ban. The FBI reports that all gun related deaths are at a historic low today and gun ownership and possession is at an historic high.( fbi.gov ) You want to raise the age of who can possess a gun? Our majority of soldiers are 18-25 years of age. Do you wish to send them into battle with sticks? There are many, many youth organizations that teaches children the proper care and use of firearms, and many youth oriented competitions. To date, not a single person who as a youth that have ever been involved with these programs has ever engaged in such mass shootings or ever involved in an offensive gun related crime. And these programs date as far back as 1891! This argument shows that not only should children be taught at a young age the safe use of firearms, but should be encouraged. Click on any of the Youth shooting program links, and notice the discipline,respect and attire that these youths demonstrates. Now click on any of your anti-gun (or any other popular youth) links and notice the youth there. Dressed like whores, or dressed in a manner where their pants around the ankles; disobedience, protesting for the legalization of drugs, extreme sexual conduct, etc.... Private pawn shops and internet companies use the same exact background checks and forms that are required by all gun dealers. Go to gun shows and the requirement is the same.(There is no "gun-show loophole). Sure,you can buy a gun from an individual, but the same goes for buying a car or any other item from them. I am far more comfortable being beside someone with a gun than I am beside someone who is a liberal.
|
|
“ WOOF !”
Since: Oct 10
Coolidge, AZ
|
Please wait...
Virginia Patriot wrote: <quoted text> Notice that every one of these mass shootings occurred in "gun free zones". Only law abiding Americans obeys the law. Criminals don't, which is why they are criminals. And the one thing that all criminals have in common is that they prefer unarmed victims. By your belief, these incidents did not happen since the guns were already illegal to be there. So either you must admit that you think they did not occur, or that your gun restriction laws are a failure. If you legislate guns out of existence, you can be certain that these crimes will become commonplace everywhere. Drugs are illegal. Yet they are easily available, even in the most guarded, policed areas such as our nation's prisons. While these tragedies do occur, they happen far less frequently than they did during the Clinton gun ban. The FBI reports that all gun related deaths are at a historic low today and gun ownership and possession is at an historic high.( fbi.gov ) You want to raise the age of who can possess a gun? Our majority of soldiers are 18-25 years of age. Do you wish to send them into battle with sticks? There are many, many youth organizations that teaches children the proper care and use of firearms, and many youth oriented competitions. To date, not a single person who as a youth that have ever been involved with these programs has ever engaged in such mass shootings or ever involved in an offensive gun related crime. And these programs date as far back as 1891! This argument shows that not only should children be taught at a young age the safe use of firearms, but should be encouraged. Click on any of the Youth shooting program links, and notice the discipline,respect and attire that these youths demonstrates. Now click on any of your anti-gun (or any other popular youth) links and notice the youth there. Dressed like whores, or dressed in a manner where their pants around the ankles; disobedience, protesting for the legalization of drugs, extreme sexual conduct, etc.... Private pawn shops and internet companies use the same exact background checks and forms that are required by all gun dealers. Go to gun shows and the requirement is the same.(There is no "gun-show loophole). Sure,you can buy a gun from an individual, but the same goes for buying a car or any other item from them. I am far more comfortable being beside someone with a gun than I am beside someone who is a liberal. Excellent post ! I agree with everything you said. If guns are outlawed, then only outlaws will have guns.
|
|
Since: Dec 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Providence060109 wrote: <quoted text> President Obama wishes to take our guns, and if that is what it takes then I say 'do it'. I do not want to be the next victim of a mass shooting. Do you? No. I do not want to be a victim of a mass shooting. This is why I conceal carry and hope that my fellow Americans there do as well. My strategy for survival is not hoping and begging that the attacker will have mercy on me.
|
|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
FaFoxy wrote: <quoted text> I never said that. I was not insinuating that you said this or that, I was clarifying my view on the topic. Sorry
|
|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
Virginia Patriot wrote: <quoted text> Notice that every one of these mass shootings occurred in "gun free zones". Only law abiding Americans obeys the law. Criminals don't, which is why they are criminals. And the one thing that all criminals have in common is that they prefer unarmed victims. By your belief, these incidents did not happen since the guns were already illegal to be there. So either you must admit that you think they did not occur, or that your gun restriction laws are a failure. If you legislate guns out of existence, you can be certain that these crimes will become commonplace everywhere. Drugs are illegal. Yet they are easily available, even in the most guarded, policed areas such as our nation's prisons. While these tragedies do occur, they happen far less frequently than they did during the Clinton gun ban. The FBI reports that all gun related deaths are at a historic low today and gun ownership and possession is at an historic high.( fbi.gov ) You want to raise the age of who can possess a gun? Our majority of soldiers are 18-25 years of age. Do you wish to send them into battle with sticks? There are many, many youth organizations that teaches children the proper care and use of firearms, and many youth oriented competitions. To date, not a single person who as a youth that have ever been involved with these programs has ever engaged in such mass shootings or ever involved in an offensive gun related crime. And these programs date as far back as 1891! This argument shows that not only should children be taught at a young age the safe use of firearms, but should be encouraged. Click on any of the Youth shooting program links, and notice the discipline,respect and attire that these youths demonstrates. Now click on any of your anti-gun (or any other popular youth) links and notice the youth there. Dressed like whores, or dressed in a manner where their pants around the ankles; disobedience, protesting for the legalization of drugs, extreme sexual conduct, etc.... Private pawn shops and internet companies use the same exact background checks and forms that are required by all gun dealers. Go to gun shows and the requirement is the same.(There is no "gun-show loophole). Sure,you can buy a gun from an individual, but the same goes for buying a car or any other item from them. I am far more comfortable being beside someone with a gun than I am beside someone who is a liberal. Oh, please, why is it that every discussion is always blown out of context? I never ever said or even conceived disarming our military. Why? Because they are well trained and most of them are responsible with the weapons they are given (Do not even attempt to throw the few cases where veterans of these recent wars have killed themselves...that is a different subject entirely.) The people I am speaking out against are the civilians, still in the US, still random employees at some retail store, bank, etc., who lack the ability to be responsible and obviously have no fear of the law whatsoever. They are the ones that need to be disarmed or punished.
|
|
Since: Dec 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Providence060109 wrote: <quoted text> Oh, please, why is it that every discussion is always blown out of context? I never ever said or even conceived disarming our military. Why? Because they are well trained and most of them are responsible with the weapons they are given (Do not even attempt to throw the few cases where veterans of these recent wars have killed themselves...that is a different subject entirely.) The people I am speaking out against are the civilians, still in the US, still random employees at some retail store, bank, etc., who lack the ability to be responsible and obviously have no fear of the law whatsoever. They are the ones that need to be disarmed or punished. The civilian carries and uses a firearm for the same reason our soldiers and police do; for protection. Americans will not surrender their guns. This is why America has never had to surrender.
|
|
Since: Sep 11
Staunton, Virginia
|
Please wait...
Virginia Patriot wrote: <quoted text> The civilian carries and uses a firearm for the same reason our soldiers and police do; for protection. Americans will not surrender their guns. This is why America has never had to surrender. Indeed, soldiers and police officers possess firearms for protection...like some civilians do...you cannot conclude that every civilian possesses a firearm for protection. Let me ask you this? Why are those who shoot random civilians carrying a firearm? Is it for protection? Or terror? I think it not wise to assume every civilian carrying or using a firearm is doing so for protection. There are those, sadly, that are, no doubt, carrying a firearm, but are carrying it to walk into a public place and consciously murder innocent people. Read the news. Another shooting just occurred in NYC. Something must change! Under ideal circumstances, I believe responsible individuals should still have the right to possess and use a firearm, but those who cannot use them responsibly must be punished. Thus, the question is asked...how can one know who is responsible and who is not? Answer: It is nearly impossible to know. What do we do then? Tighten restrictions and regulations on gun ownership, limit usage of firearms to those who have been trained solely on keeping peace, such as: soldiers and police, and finally, require every person wishing to possess a firearm take the same course as police. Will people agree? Probably not. But something must change. If we do not want the federal government taking them away completely, then we need to agree to some regulations.
|
|
“O'er the land of the free ? ”
Since: Jan 09
Don't Tread On Me
|
Please wait...
Providence060109 wrote: <quoted text> Indeed, soldiers and police officers possess firearms for protection...like some civilians do...you cannot conclude that every civilian possesses a firearm for protection. Let me ask you this? Why are those who shoot random civilians carrying a firearm? Is it for protection? Or terror? I think it not wise to assume every civilian carrying or using a firearm is doing so for protection. There are those, sadly, that are, no doubt, carrying a firearm, but are carrying it to walk into a public place and consciously murder innocent people. Read the news. Another shooting just occurred in NYC. Something must change! Under ideal circumstances, I believe responsible individuals should still have the right to possess and use a firearm, but those who cannot use them responsibly must be punished. Thus, the question is asked...how can one know who is responsible and who is not? Answer: It is nearly impossible to know. What do we do then? Tighten restrictions and regulations on gun ownership, limit usage of firearms to those who have been trained solely on keeping peace, such as: soldiers and police, and finally, require every person wishing to possess a firearm take the same course as police. Will people agree? Probably not. But something must change. If we do not want the federal government taking them away completely, then we need to agree to some regulations. Insanity. The Federal Government was designed to have the citizens as it's master not the other way around. Your ideas are those of a totalitarian state. It is collective punishment to try to put forth any infringement because of the acts of others. I don't see you putting in a breathalyzer ignition lock because your neighbor or someone across the country drove drunk and killed someone. Is the victim of drunk drivers a child of a lessor god ?
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|