Tiger in exile, and re-entry won't be easy

All you people with sins should not be casing stones at Tiger woods. Shame on you and remember that only God has that right to judge.

Well stated Anthony. We will all be judged...for some they will be judged on they spent their life judging others...

anthony armenta wrote:

All you people with sins should not be casing stones at Tiger woods. Shame on you and remember that only God has that right to judge.

Who's judging? He is guilty by his own admission!

His re-entry will be somewhat of a circus. He probably, or should, have a press conference admitting he screwed up and say that is all he will say about his personal life. If any reporter again asks a question about his personal life then he should get up and leave. I think most of his problems will come from the fans, although a minority of fans, who will, without respect for the game, yell-talk-move etc etc while he is trying to or making a shot. I think that will be the biggest challenge for him.

Here we have another writer who not only thinks he can write but thinks he is funny too.
Must be trying for a job at TMZ or one of the other rags.
And Hey how about Phil Mickelson using a square-groove Ping-Eye 2 wedge, legal or not;
Ethics and "official rules" are obviously two different things.

Like i really give a sh!t about Tiger .

Paul wrote:

Here we have another writer who not only thinks he can write but thinks he is funny too.
Must be trying for a job at TMZ or one of the other rags.
And Hey how about Phil Mickelson using a square-groove Ping-Eye 2 wedge, legal or not;
Ethics and "official rules" are obviously two different things.

Well, this is an old 90's version of the square groove and is approved for play so it is not illegal/cheating. Should he, and a handful of others, use it since it is against 'the spirit of the game'? It would be nice if ALL the players were using the same type of club. There is a madatory(?) players meeting Tues. and Finchem said that this topic will be discussed and, probably, be settled. I guess we will know Tues. eve.

Paul wrote:

Here we have another writer who not only thinks he can write but thinks he is funny too.
Must be trying for a job at TMZ or one of the other rags.
And Hey how about Phil Mickelson using a square-groove Ping-Eye 2 wedge, legal or not;
Ethics and "official rules" are obviously two different things.

if you have never cheated on your taxes then you can talk about ethics

zoomer wrote:

Like i really give a sh!t about Tiger .

if you didnot, you would not read the stories and make ludicrous statements

what ethics wrote:

<quoted text>
if you have never cheated on your taxes then you can talk about ethics

Where the H--- did I say anyone cheated ??
Barry Bonds said nothing gives you an edge.
ETHICS VS. OFFICIAL RULES ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS !!

zoomer wrote:

Like i really give a sh!t about Tiger .

Well Zoomer if you don't give a shit about Tiger then don't read the article and don't comment. We don't give a shit if you don't give a shit.

"only God has that right to judge"

......but what if he decides to delegate?

You people that think you know what your talking about when it comes to "judging" need to read the Bible more. The Bible tells us to make judgments on a daily basis. Who do follow, and why or why not?

What the bible condemns is condemning others