Does Aaron Rodgers, Mike McCarthy or Ted Thompson Mean More To The Green Bay Packers Organization?

Only a so-called "sports" writer could ever come up with a question so frickin incredibly stupid. That is because most sports writers couldn't even make the cut as a water boy.

LMFAO! I agree what a stupid question, I got through the first few sentances and said forget it. Dumb, just dumb. Reminds me of this silly little Viking fan I know.

Or #2 or #3 CB could easily end up beig as important as any player or person associated with the team. Some people simply don't undersand TEAM sports.

The story clearly limits the question to only those three members of the Packers. It does not say they are the only important people associated with the Packers. I actually thought the question presented a good argument. Of course, I would never want to see any of the Packers leave the organization.

It doesn't matter if the question is extended to every player, coach, trainer and management employee or just two. It is a ridiculous question to ask about members who are part of the same team. A TEAM is like a chain. It's only as strong as it's weakest link. Either everybody wins together or they all lose together. It may be a cliche, but there is no "I" in team. And no one person deserves the credit. For example, is Tom Brady the reason the Patriots won 3 Super Bowls? If so, what about the years they didn't? Were those his fault? Or does Belichick get the credit and blame? Or should the person that scored the game winning points get the credit - Adam Vinatieri! The truth is that if the TEAM didn't put Adam Vinatieri in position to kick the game winning field goals he couldn't have been the hero. Every championship is a TEAM accomplishment.