Should same-sex marriage become legal?

Judged:

7

5

3

wiser_dude wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't even spell or use the correct noun - verb conjugation. The sentence above in its proper form should be:
So, what you are saying is that two people who are in love with one another can't get married just because someone said it was wrong?
If you are still in school, please try to bring your English grade up to at least a B and if you're no longer in school, well you are just another example of our tax dollars educating the next generation of ditch diggers and prostitutes.
It still takes a man and a woman to procreate; just as it has from the beginning of time. Even your pathetic example of the human race was created the exact same way.
I'll bet you voted for Obama too!

Judged:

3

2

1

Mickaela15 wrote:

<quoted text>
no i didn't vote for anyone, sense i dont live in US....and i dont give a F**k of how my spelling is, you all understanded it, didn't you? so ef of now you homofobic grammar nazi!

Judged:

4

4

3

cookielove1992 wrote:

whether people agree with same sex marriage or not it still should be legal
i dont care what some BS book says
not allowing is just being something called "selfish" keeping marriage only to males n females
marriage is a special thing linking one person to another which should be allowed for ALL couples

Judged:

2

cookielove1992 wrote:

why shouldn't gays be able to marry
equal rights its only fair

Judged:

4

2

1

wiser_dude wrote:

<quoted text>
You can't even spell or use the correct noun - verb conjugation. The sentence above in its proper form should be:
So, what you are saying is that two people who are in love with one another can't get married just because someone said it was wrong?
If you are still in school, please try to bring your English grade up to at least a B and if you're no longer in school, well you are just another example of our tax dollars educating the next generation of ditch diggers and prostitutes.
It still takes a man and a woman to procreate; just as it has from the beginning of time. Even your pathetic example of the human race was created the exact same way.
I'll bet you voted for Obama too!

Judged:

2

2

1

peterbuilt_1 wrote:

<quoted text>Isay if a sate should want to alow same sex mirrage then let them the Fed needs to stay out of it you know that thang clled the tenth amendment. I am not for it but like I said if that is what the state want to do ok

Judged:

3

2

peterbuilt_1 wrote:

<quoted text>When you correct someones english you should not be wrong yourself (was should be is )

Judged:

3

2

1

wiser_dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Is = present tense
Was = past tense
Since she is already alive, "was" is the correct tense.

Judged:

2

2

2

cookielove1992 wrote:

<quoted text>
my god forget about spelling Jesus Christ...
go to an english lesson if you wanna teach english

Judged:

4

4

3

cookielove1992 wrote:

whether people agree with same sex marriage or not it still should be legal
i dont care what some BS book says
not allowing is just being something called "selfish" keeping marriage only to males n females
marriage is a special thing linking one person to another which should be allowed for ALL couples

Judged:

4

3

3

Tracy wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you refer to the BIBLE as"BS"? If you don't agree or follow the BIBLE, then that's your decision. But you need to have some respect. That is just disrespectful!!!!! Some of you homosexual people like to go on about, how you are disrespected and not treated fairly. When. Some of you don't know what respect is. It's a two way thing; whether peope want to accept homosexuality or not is up to them, you cannot force it on people.

Judged:

1

1

wiser_dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, at least you acknowledge Jesus Christ even though you used the name as a swear word.
Maybe you should address the person who corrected me. If he hadn't posted, I wouldn't have responded to him.

Judged:

3

3

2

Tracy wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you refer to the BIBLE as"BS"? If you don't agree or follow the BIBLE, then that's your decision. But you need to have some respect. That is just disrespectful!!!!! Some of you homosexual people like to go on about, how you are disrespected and not treated fairly. When. Some of you don't know what respect is. It's a two way thing; whether peope want to accept homosexuality or not is up to them, you cannot force it on people.

Judged:

3

2

2

cookielove1992 wrote:

<quoted text>
sorry lol but if the bible says two people of the same sex cant marry then its BS to me

Judged:

3

2

2

wiser_dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Sodom and Gomorrah were full of people just like who were obiterated due to their sinful selfishness.

Judged:

1

1

1

ABW wrote:

Marriage by definition known to every faith is the union of a man and a woman as ordained by God. The State merely binds this union in the form of a "Civil Contract" today. But no religion no matter how obscure has ever stated that a marriage is between any two people.
I am sorry folks but that is the definition as it has always existed. Marriage is a religious ceremony. Anything other than that is simply a civil union sanctioned by a government.
You are asking to change the definition of a religious term and only a religious faith, by permission of some God or Creator or whatever you choose to call him can do that. Its just that simple.

Judged:

3

3

3

ABW wrote:

Marriage is a religious covenant between a man and a woman blessed by a religious faith. There is no form of religious faith that sanctions marriage by definition in any other form. Its that simple Gay Marriage is therefore impossible.
A civil union on the other hand is a form on contractual agreement between two people. That's the best you can do there. To call it marriage is to pervert the term. Why not then let me marry my sister or a father his daughter, or multiple wives?
Sorry marriage exists in only one form...the joining of a man and a woman.

Judged:

4

4

2

ABW wrote:

Marriage is a religious covenant between a man and a woman blessed by a religious faith. There is no form of religious faith that sanctions marriage by definition in any other form. Its that simple Gay Marriage is therefore impossible.
A civil union on the other hand is a form on contractual agreement between two people. That's the best you can do there. To call it marriage is to pervert the term. Why not then let me marry my sister or a father his daughter, or multiple wives?
Sorry marriage exists in only one form...the joining of a man and a woman.