The above NOT "truthmeter" post is typical of the raves and rants of unionized ridicule (protesting for teachers rights to demand "teachers first" in our school's budgeting plan) which is preached from the union bully pulpit as social justice gospel in Saul Alinsky's book: Rules for Radicals.<quoted text>
Dr Kohls has been an educator for more years then the kids in Springboro schools have been alive. So many people complain about her because they wish they were more like her. Successful. David Rigano gets the same treatment. He is also successful. The internet was invented to share information. The parents should realize this. There is no need for us to pay for the schools. Turn the computers on and quit asking me for money to pay for your kids. The principle makes to much. That has been talked about for years. Look at the work Dr Kohl and Mr. Rigano have done. They can prove how much we spend paying for people to teach. But you can get free school on the internet so why are we even doing this? The schools need to be cheaper but internet schools are free. and if you do not have your own computer they will even give you one. How is that not a good deal? Dr Kohls fights for the taxpayers. Rick Santorum does to. Homeschool or internet school are best so you are not asking other people to take care of your kids.
This unionized bible sets forth the principles of union activists' rebellion against the established principles of protecting and promoting responsibility of the family unit, as the most important important to our economy and our society.
Too often, our public schools union employees, compete with the family in their tunnel-vision self-interest agenda to present the "local school government" as the primary caretaker/co-parent of our children enrolled in our public schools. Many of these priorities that soak up our school tax dollars needed for classroom educacation are nothing more than social engineering. Their agenda is to raise the next generation with the same "Government Entitlement Mentality" of our union activists that everyone has a "right" to demand a government big enough to meet the "wants" of each one.(For example, this obsession that our federal and state governments currently express locally in the "fatness" of our school kids; and how the government is taking charge to "caretake and micromanage our kids fatness" according to whatever the latest findings are from the government's research (which is conducted to support whatever high cost agenda is "the cause of the day" in our kid's government controlled education). This in turn, mandates large numbers of school staff members to "regulate, tabulate, and communicate" test results to the government's "Fat Patrol Experts." This in turn requires more work for the "Fat Patrol" which then leads to big demands that "It Takes Money!" to educate our fatter than ever kids; so taxpayers must trim even more money from their already skinny earnings; and fatten up those union activists pockets, who are "doing it all for OUR kids!" Oh indeed! how our union activists do "treasure" our kids for "laying up more dollars in their SEA "treasure" chests!
How is that not a "good deal" for the union??