People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit

s-sdca wrote:

<quoted text>
I wouldn't even respond to nuts like that, just flag the post for being inappropriate.

True... tis what I should've done.

Briguymn wrote:

<quoted text>
Can someone please send this verse to NOM in Maine?

And when someone does, be sure to utilize the correct context of the passage [Jer. 20:4-5].

The accuser asserts that Job had to have been a 'hypocrite' because he suffered at the hands of the enemy of his soul. BTW Zopar was wrong.

Bible commentator, Matthew Henry wrote: "Zophar proceeds very plainly to show the ruin and destruction of wicked people, insinuating that because Job was destroyed and ruined he was certainly a wicked man and a hypocrite."

To iterate, Zopar was wrong!

Adrian Vance
“Saving America with truth.”

Joined: Nov 9, 2008
Comments: 1126
Lakeport, California
ISP: San Francisco, CA
Reply »
|Report Abuse|#54 hrs ago

I see a conflict here as a man identifying himself as Elizabeth Larson's husband called me the evening of January 1, 2009, 8:15 PM and threatened to "beat you up with the help of my buddy Rod Mitchell" as I had commented here that I thought she had been fired from the Record Bee given my experience with her.(documented at:http://wearemagic.i8.com )

I wrote a letter to Sheriff Mitchel and Deputy Steven Herdt met with me in my home. I asked that he call on Mr. Larson to explain to him that such threats were felonies. He went away, but did not call back to tell me that he had which is SOP in law enforcement when handling threats.

The point is that there is a claimed close relationship between the Larson's and Mr. Mitchell and indicated by what I have seen not being able to prosecute such to my satisfaction in this county. This is the fourth such matter.

I think we need some sweeping changes here and more professional people in positions of responsibility. It is sad that this county has become a joke. It hurts all of us.

http://photos.tmz.com/galleries/carrie_prejea...

Spider wrote:

Obviously your wonderful woman is sleeping alone while her wonderful husband chats with homosexuals all night long. Whats with that?.......Hmmmmmmmm-mmm-mm?

On a average week, My wife and I sleep together between 15 to 20 hours a week depending on our work schedules as I do alot of late night shifts at my job and she gets up at 4 in the morning Monday through Friday to go to work.

And now this:

http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/08/carrie-prejeans...

Eaglefan9727 wrote:

<quoted text>
On a average week, My wife and I sleep together between 15 to 20 hours a week depending on our work schedules as I do alot of late night shifts at my job and she gets up at 4 in the morning Monday through Friday to go to work.

Does she know about us and why do you only want to meet at truck stop bathrooms?

So, after a few days... did I miss anything??

Just kidding, it is nice to see some things (like this back and forth), hasn't changed...

So is the tape on Ebay yet??

SHe is intitled to her own opinion, just like anyone else. Its called "Freedom of Speech". They asked her a question and she answered it honestly. I would much rather see someone be honest then politically correct.

She certainly is free to take matters into her own hands. That's just what she seems to have done.

Traditional Values wrote:

SHe is intitled to her own opinion, just like anyone else. Its called "Freedom of Speech". They asked her a question and she answered it honestly. I would much rather see someone be honest then politically correct.

Traditional Values wrote:

SHe is intitled to her own opinion, just like anyone else. Its called "Freedom of Speech". They asked her a question and she answered it honestly. I would much rather see someone be honest then politically correct.

There's also something called "hate speech" and that is what she's done in the aftermath. If she'd just answered the question and went on with her life, she'd be off the hook. But going around to anti-gay churches and aligning herself with a hate group is not the way to get people to back off. She put herself on a moral high horse and now we are happy to see her hyprocrisy bitting her in the ass.

ACLU-Tom wrote:

She certainly is free to take matters into her own hands. That's just what she seems to have done.
<quoted text>

lol thats very true, we agree on something.

s-sdca wrote:

<quoted text>
There's also something called "hate speech" and that is what she's done in the aftermath. If she'd just answered the question and went on with her life, she'd be off the hook. But going around to anti-gay churches and aligning herself with a hate group is not the way to get people to back off. She put herself on a moral high horse and now we are happy to see her hyprocrisy bitting her in the ass.

After the gay community went after her. They could have let it go also.

Traditional Values wrote:

<quoted text>After the gay community went after her. They could have let it go also.

Those darn gays. Always standing up for themselves. The nerve!

Traditional Values wrote:

<quoted text>After the gay community went after her. They could have let it go also.

Actually, many of the gay blogs and sites I read held just as much contempt for Perez Hilton doing his video calling her names as they did with her.

She's the one that decided to set herself up as one of the morality police.

What's really telling about this forum is the people standing up for her. It doesn't matter that she made a porn tape. It doesn't matter that she had surgically enhanced her appearance for sex appeal. It doesn't matter that she lied to the pageant committee and violated her contract. Nope, all that matters is she professed her anti-gay attitudes. That, in and of itself, makes her worth defending to the death.

We saw the same thing with Ted Haggard, Larry Craig and anybody else who spews anti-gay comments. No matter how big of a scandal they are personally involved in, as long as they continue to be anti-gay, the majority of the religous right will continue to defend them. Baffling.

Traditional Values wrote:

<quoted text>After the gay community went after her. They could have let it go also.

Remind us just WHEN your paragon of virtue paraded around naked for beat off photos, and just when again did she do the porn tape which even TMZ will not release? Was that before or after her high and mighty act took off..remind us, will you, when did she get naked for anyone who would point a camera at her? Before or after that idiot Perez?

Tell all of us again WHY she was and continues to be such a threat to the gay community. You are the ones who blew up over her answering a question honestly. Since then she has had to try to defend herself from unwarrented actions. If she made a masterbation video, who cares. Thats her business. Besides, I don't think their is a whole lot of call for viewing it from the gay community. Now maybe from the lesbian community, but they are into woman after all.

i knew this witless brawd would be exposed. She's a bubble headed blond nitwit who cant tell her ass from her elbow. She stumbled and bumbled that whole gay rights question, and just so happen to say something controversial, eventhough she was not aiming to do so. That was pure "dumb" luck, and she exploited the whole "gays right agenda" for her benefit. She has store bought tits, she was in at leaset one sex tape diddleing herself on camera...is this what "Christian values" look like...lol

Traditional Values wrote:

<quoted text>After the gay community went after her. They could have let it go also.

Really? That's your response. We didn't let anything go, because she continues to speak out against us. Even though her parents are both suspected of being gay according to their divorce settlements, so that bs about how she was raised is another lie on her part. The problem is most conservatives seem to think she "is being put upon" by the gay community, without doing research into her lies.

Seriously before you defend her again look into her background and see what a good Christian she really is. If anything at this point, the Christian right should abandon using her as a ploy against us, because she's been "exposed" in many ways that don't coinside with their agenda.

Traditional Values wrote:

Tell all of us again WHY she was and continues to be such a threat to the gay community. You are the ones who blew up over her answering a question honestly. Since then she has had to try to defend herself from unwarrented actions. If she made a masterbation video, who cares. Thats her business. Besides, I don't think their is a whole lot of call for viewing it from the gay community. Now maybe from the lesbian community, but they are into woman after all.

She was trying to extort money for the organization that supported her, even after she broke her contract many times over. DO YOUR RESEARCH! The tape is out, because she lied about her activities, broke her contract and continued to use her title that was stripped from her for these reasons. It's evidence in court because she's a liar and we know what the bible says about liars.

She's no threat to us at all. It's just fun to watch everything implode, because of her decietfulness.