Brangelina Baby Celebrated With $300,000 Donation

Shane wrote:

<quoted text>
Where do you get your info. from, cause its just not true.

You were right i was wrong... she gives more... she gives one third of her income.... my bad thanks for correcting me. BTW thats common knowledge look it up. Thats why the charities love her. just ask Bono or Wyclef jean......
This week she was not able to attend the fundraiser that Wyclef Jean throws evry year for the poeple of his native Haiti. So he ask for something to be auctioned off. She sent in the black pearls she wore for the ceremony when sh got her humanitarian award. It drew a final bid of over $192,000. all donated to Wyclef Jeans charity. look it up pal...

Carol Ann wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, well, this is true - Mr. Modernistic Mystical Pitt dropped his trousers of his own accord.

Did you look into Ms anistons past. didn't she have a main squeeze before Brad Pitt called Tate donovan. they were the hottest couple back then and he even starred on an episode of Friends with her. The lasted over three years then broke up. His reason
He says she was too ambitious and did not want the simpler things in life. while he liked to be simple she wanted fancy. BTW she didn't like him riding his motorcycle either. Yep she seemed to have a pattern with her men. She has what she wants a career with no baby pressure so she could keep herself in shape for those mags.

What people do in their private lives, as long as they are consenting adults, is their concern. I am really just not that interested in Angelina or Brad Pitt. Now that they had their baby, can we please get on with our lives now? Media, give all of us breathing room----including we the public.

Kris wrote:

I think they should pay more attention to children in the US. The more these two avoid the media makes me think there is something in it for them.

Why should they pay attention to the US children? we are a stinkin rich country!!! why haven't we taken care of our own ask the government what it does with the money.... I tell you what CNN today showed a brief article about how this government spends millions to make chicken feed that keeps them from passing gas. Thats were the money is going and of course the war that doesn't seem to go anywhere. Sounds like another Vietnam to me. Tally up how much is spent on the war--- compared to how much this rich nation gives its poor or feeds its poor or takes care of its elderly. There are elderly people eating dogg food and catfood cause they cant afford it. so please dont talk about this poor country b/c poor is not what we are. We are the land of the rich and famous.
These other countries are poor.

Kris wrote:

<quoted text> I thought I should add this: Shiloh is a name of Hebrew origin meaning, "His gift," per thinkbabynames.com .

Actually it means one that was sent. according to Jewish translation....

Juju wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you virgin? I know that by tradition having sex before getting married is wrong too. But Nowadays no body needs to follow the tradition. so htere is no crime being committed if you have sex before getting married and the same applies to starting a relationship and with someone who is being divorced and having a baby with the same person once he is divorced.
That is the suite revenge for Brad Pitt. Love you Brad. you will leave happy ever even if something goes later wrong with Angie. You have accomplished something. You biggest dream.
In matter of less the 17 month since you first separated from your ex-wife you have not 1 not 2 but 3 children. Who care about the rest?

Ive been trying to tell that to these people about the staats on unmarried couples and premarital sex. Even showed them the latest stats but somehow they miss the point and forget that Jen is included in that stat b/c she is not married and having premarital sex. But they refuse to see the flip side.
karma baby- Angelina has good karma thats why Brad is happy. Family and all.

tmj3 wrote:

<quoted text>
Ive been trying to tell that to these people about the staats on unmarried couples and premarital sex. Even showed them the latest stats but somehow they miss the point and forget that Jen is included in that stat b/c she is not married and having premarital sex. But they refuse to see the flip side.
karma baby- Angelina has good karma thats why Brad is happy. Family and all.

tmj3...you are rolling!!!!!!!!!! LOL

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHHAHAHHAH. I'm so glad i started this thread

Tek wrote:

Wow. Slut Angie is really desparate to repair her wh*re/home-wrecker image. Oh well. Good for the African children

who are you calling a slut, if you wants you, you would probably jump on it. angie is an unselfish, sophisicated person, that is why brad and everyone on this planet is so in love with her... get a life...

tmj3 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why should they pay attention to the US children? we are a stinkin rich country!!! why haven't we taken care of our own ask the government what it does with the money.... I tell you what CNN today showed a brief article about how this government spends millions to make chicken feed that keeps them from passing gas. Thats were the money is going and of course the war that doesn't seem to go anywhere. Sounds like another Vietnam to me. Tally up how much is spent on the war--- compared to how much this rich nation gives its poor or feeds its poor or takes care of its elderly. There are elderly people eating dogg food and catfood cause they cant afford it. so please dont talk about this poor country b/c poor is not what we are. We are the land of the rich and famous.
These other countries are poor.

So you don't think the poor children of America should be taken care of, is that what your saying?

winnie wrote:

<quoted text> who are you calling a slut, if you wants you, you would probably jump on it. angie is an unselfish, sophisicated person, that is why brad and everyone on this planet is so in love with her... get a life...

No thanks. I wouldn't touch that dirty skank with a 10-foot pole. In love? Please. I'd like to hear what you have to say in a couple months when they divorce like every other married celebrity couple. Two people that famous, that good-looking, who met in an affair. Yeah, that'll last, lol

Juju wrote:

<quoted text>
take care of your own kids!! there are a lot of opportunities for people in the USA that the rest of the world do not have. Why not give the chance to those people also who do not have the minimum of opportunities? I don't think all the good thing should be going back to america because you would end up doing nothing with. Because people are able to contribute else than america gives more sens to life. Take care of your own kids.
Why can you judge the fact that Oprah contribute a lot in Africa especially?? is there something in it for her too?

The American citizens who can afford to take of their own kids do, but unfortunatley there are some who can not. Let me ask you though, how much money do you donate to the poor of Africa? Americans end up doing nothing with it, what freakin planet do you live on? The United States supports the whole world, including Cananda. Maybe instead of sitting around and writing stupid remarks you should be taking care of your kids, and donating your money to Africa.

Leave the couple alone to raise their children how they see fit. Making movies is their job!!!!Their private life is just that--private. I know- we should have media people follow around the inventor of the next great medicine to fight cancer, or how about the next person to walk on the moon, or maybe the Babe Ruth's of the world and their families to the point of invading their private lives twenty-four hours a day? You can bet there would be an uproar and they would not have to live with it for long.
When movie stars have a press conference with the media, great ask your questions and take your pictures--but otherwise leave them alone, and for pete's sake leave their children alone.
If people would not buy trashy magazines, etc.; the media would have to report on the important issues of the day--political races, cure for AIDS, cancer, or how about who won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Who someone sleeps with in the privacy of their home is their business whether a moviestar, shopkeeper, or dentist. Who cares? As for calling Brad or Angelina names, ridiculous. Who is that benefiting? Married or not, it is still supposed to be private information and not privy to every Tom, Dick and Harry of the world unless they themselves make it everyone's business.
Who cares what children they choose to support and help? It is their money, yes folks, their money to do with as they wish. No matter the needs in the US, France, Canada or whereever else in the world they are helping the children in Africa with the recent blown-out-of-proportion donation--and quite frankly, kudos to them for helping at all; they don't have to.
I think the question should be asked of the people who care so much--what is lacking in your life that this is entertainment for you????
EVERYONE GET YOUR OWN LIFE AND LET PEOPLE WHO MAKE A LIVING ENTERTAINING US LIVE THEIR OWN LIVES WITHOUT INTERFERNCE.

bewildered wrote:

Leave the couple alone to raise their children how they see fit. Making movies is their job!!!!Their private life is just that--private. I know- we should have media people follow around the inventor of the next great medicine to fight cancer, or how about the next person to walk on the moon, or maybe the Babe Ruth's of the world and their families to the point of invading their private lives twenty-four hours a day? You can bet there would be an uproar and they would not have to live with it for long.
When movie stars have a press conference with the media, great ask your questions and take your pictures--but otherwise leave them alone, and for pete's sake leave their children alone.
If people would not buy trashy magazines, etc.; the media would have to report on the important issues of the day--political races, cure for AIDS, cancer, or how about who won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Who someone sleeps with in the privacy of their home is their business whether a moviestar, shopkeeper, or dentist. Who cares? As for calling Brad or Angelina names, ridiculous. Who is that benefiting? Married or not, it is still supposed to be private information and not privy to every Tom, Dick and Harry of the world unless they themselves make it everyone's business.
Who cares what children they choose to support and help? It is their money, yes folks, their money to do with as they wish. No matter the needs in the US, France, Canada or whereever else in the world they are helping the children in Africa with the recent blown-out-of-proportion donation--and quite frankly, kudos to them for helping at all; they don't have to.
I think the question should be asked of the people who care so much--what is lacking in your life that this is entertainment for you????
EVERYONE GET YOUR OWN LIFE AND LET PEOPLE WHO MAKE A LIVING ENTERTAINING US LIVE THEIR OWN LIVES WITHOUT INTERFERNCE.

Funny, your telling everyone to get a life, but yet you took time out of your life to say that. If they wanted so privacy then maybe they should not have the media called everytime they are about to make a donation, or hold interviews to talk about their favorite charity.

CeCe wrote:

<quoted text> So you don't think the poor children of America should be taken care of, is that what your saying?

Do you even read... I am saying dont compare the poor nations to this very rich nation that throws away money on nonsense and lets its poor suffer. Look at the Katrina disaster. The government has millions of dollars at its disposal and those people are still homeless almost a year later. There was milions and millions of dollars donated to the katrina victims--where did it go? There were millions of dollars and fundraisers donated to rebuild the twin twoers site-- look at the site five years later its still a bare reminder of this greedy nation. And while your at it let me know how much did Ms. aniston give? She is very rich you know. Does she donate one third of her income?

Tek wrote:

<quoted text>
No thanks. I wouldn't touch that dirty skank with a 10-foot pole. In love? Please. I'd like to hear what you have to say in a couple months when they divorce like every other married celebrity couple. Two people that famous, that good-looking, who met in an affair. Yeah, that'll last, lol

Canadian people [on this forum] are mean and evil. I really believe BP & AJ must have ignored them, not give an autograph or something while filming there. Pitiful.......ummmm.

CeCe wrote:

<quoted text> The American citizens who can afford to take of their own kids do, but unfortunatley there are some who can not. Let me ask you though, how much money do you donate to the poor of Africa? Americans end up doing nothing with it, what freakin planet do you live on? The United States supports the whole world, including Cananda. Maybe instead of sitting around and writing stupid remarks you should be taking care of your kids, and donating your money to Africa.

America does not support the whole world. Its one of the richest nations yet the poorer nations give more to the poor nations. Britian gives more.. I am saying is our government has enough money to support its poor and have programs in place to help but they keep cutting back on the needy. We dont have eminent danger like these other countries do? War torn countries. Earthquake plagued countries. We just saw on the news the latest earthquake that hit. Those countries do not have the resources. I lived in one of the most richest places in Florida and the money those people spend on all those lavish luxuries could feed the poor in this country. Im talking people with at least seven cars for one person in their garage. Those people have also two boats thre or four homes all around the world. Those people that live off the luxuries and the extravagant lifestyles with a child that spend more time with the nannies that with the parents. They would not help the hurricane victims when it rolled over Florida two years ago in which we got slammed with four major hurricanes. You want to know what they did? They called up bitchin about thier homes cause they had no cable...And where plannin toleave to thier other home in France if we didn't fix the problem. I should know i had to deal with these self absorbed idiots all the time.

CeCe wrote:

<quoted text> Funny, your telling everyone to get a life, but yet you took time out of your life to say that. If they wanted so privacy then maybe they should not have the media called everytime they are about to make a donation, or hold interviews to talk about their favorite charity.

I will respond to your e-mail because I think it does need a response. I wrote in this forum because it is my right to. I did take time out of my life to do so because I am sick of seeing people in the entertainment industry hounded to the point of exhaustion and fear. Whether they want to announce they have given a donation to someone or have interviews to announce the charity they will be supporting is no different than Bill Gates doing the same thing. If I had the kind of job they do that would afford me the ability to announce to the world charities that can and do need more help, I would do so and I applaud their efforts completely.
I will say again, leave them alone to raise their children and live their lives the way they want. It is their life and not ours.

tmj3 wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you even read... I am saying dont compare the poor nations to this very rich nation that throws away money on nonsense and lets its poor suffer. Look at the Katrina disaster. The government has millions of dollars at its disposal and those people are still homeless almost a year later. There was milions and millions of dollars donated to the katrina victims--where did it go? There were millions of dollars and fundraisers donated to rebuild the twin twoers site-- look at the site five years later its still a bare reminder of this greedy nation. And while your at it let me know how much did Ms. aniston give? She is very rich you know. Does she donate one third of her income?

Yes I do read, quite well actually. Your first line was "Why pay attention to U.S children" You'll have to ask Aniston herself what she donated, maybe she does it quietly, she might not feel the need to hold a press conference or have an interview when donating money. That is right though, there are poor people in this country, so why do you think it is okay to take American money that they made in this country and donate it to another country. Americans are getting fed up with the way our government is wasting money, and hopefully they will take the hint and stop. I donate money, clothing, food, maybe if these rich celebrities did a little more of that themselves there would be less poverty in the country you live in, the country that gives you the right to view your opinions of how they waste money and the country that provides you opportunites you can not get anywhere else.. SUPPORT AMERICA

CeCe wrote:

<quoted text> If they wanted so privacy then maybe they should not have the media called everytime they are about to make a donation, or hold interviews to talk about their favorite charity.

Maybe they feel that if they tell everyone about their donations, then, others will get up off their stingy, sorry asses and do something too.
They serve as an example to many.