|
“I'm here with bells on.”
Since: Jul 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote: <quoted text>
Oh, so she should have given up sex becasue she was sick?@@
Spoken like someone that couldn't get laid if her life depended on it.
Who says she knew she was sick BEFORE she got pregnant Skanky?
I dont understand why idiots like you dont think before you say something stupid. I'm going to assume it's because you have a normal-functioning social brain. Tends to cloud one's perception of one that has no function in the 'empathy' department (otherwise known as a 'sociopath'.) Only psychological profilers seem to have that level of perception, when it comes to that subset of human beings.....
|
|
Ink
Bensalem, PA
|
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote: <quoted text> Clearly, you're WRONG as usual, since that was the reason given in that country for NOT treating her cancer you dunce. <quoted text> Correction: Abortion will always be available as long as ANYONE wants one, with or without doctors and safe medical treatments. What MOST poeple want to prevent is going back to the age of deaths like this: http://www.lifeandlibertyforwomen.org/about_g... Abortion has been around as long as pregnancy has, and its NOT going away. THe only thing that some are TRYING to make go away is making it safer than it used to be. Fortunately, with assholes like Skanky spouting stupidity against education by saying nonsense like "who needs education? They already KNOW how to use BC.." and even BIGGER idiots with power like we're seeing being played out today by Aikin - who thinks "legitimate rape" doesn't result in pregnancy ONLY proves how wrong fools like Skanky are. Igorance, most often willful - blindness - like yours Inkstain, most often selective, superstition most often caused by religous dogma, shows just how much the average person DOESNT know, and they pass their ignorance on from generation to generation. As long as ignorance abounds, then women's right to choose WILL be necessary. Again talking about chemo treatment in this country would not be viewed as a means to an abortion. I get so tired or repeating past conversations to you so that you can catch and make sense.
|
|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
sassy Jm wrote: <quoted text>Oh my...lookie we have here....an honest proabort who flat out said YES to my question of if she supports the choice to abort. That's a first. No its not you lying sack of shit. I and many others have said it would depend on the circumstances. I support women's right to make their own CHOICES 100%- period. Whether I would support the choices they make is irrelevant, but even if it wasn't, it would depend on the her circumstances.
|
|
“I'm here with bells on.”
Since: Jul 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Ink wrote: <quoted text>
Do you know a lot of women with prostrate cancer?
We were discussing life saving chemo treatments. As a treatment for cancer, or as abortifacients? You never clarified. Just checking. I seem to recall that I did - but you ignored that post.
|
|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
zef wrote: <quoted text>Women are female humans. Birth has nothing to do with who is, or isn't a female human. Jews are a race of sub-humans, which is why they can't be called persons. Birth has nothing to do with anyones race. Race is determined by genetics upon conception. And yet another example of a complete idiot.
|
|
“I'm here with bells on.”
Since: Jul 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote: <quoted text>WTF is this idiot talking about? The effects of too much Xanax on the planet ZEF. JMO.
|
|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote: <quoted text>
She said THAT? Oh yes she did. MANY times over MANY years.
|
|
Ink
Bensalem, PA
|
Judged:
1
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote: <quoted text>
**sighs**
You two are truly the blind leading the stupid.
If she had "extensive injurites to her abdomen and her uterus had to be removed" the fetus would be dead already you idiot. Are you sure the embryo died , dr foo? lol
|
|
|
|
Ink
Bensalem, PA
|
LiT rabbit foo foo wrote: <quoted text>
Chemo isn't an "emergency" treatment you dolt.
A car accident and cancer are not even REMOTELY comparitable. No but in both cases you would be ending the pregnancy without an abortion. That is the comparison. I have to explain everything to you.
|
|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
Ink wrote: <quoted text>
Do you know a lot of women with prostrate cancer?
We were discussing life saving chemo treatments. That's right. And you asked what cancer that wasn't life threatening that needed chemo. Prostate (not prostRate you moron) cancer is just one example of a cancer that can be treated with chemo that isn't necessisarily life threatening. There are others. Again, your MORONIC question was answered factually. Why dont you stop playing moron and actually THINK before you post?
|
|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
Ink wrote: <quoted text>
Again talking about chemo treatment in this country would not be viewed as a means to an abortion. I get so tired or repeating past conversations to you so that you can catch and make sense. Actually, chemo wasn't viewed as a "means to an abortion" in the Dominican Republic either you IDIOT. Dont bother repeating anything Inkstain, it only serves to make you look even stupider. I understood both the article AND the following "discussion" just fine. Clearly YOU did not. Perhaps its YOU that needs to "catch and make sense". You fukwit.
|
|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote: <quoted text>As a treatment for cancer, or as abortifacients?
You never clarified.
Just checking.
I seem to recall that I did - but you ignored that post. NOBODY was discussing chemo as an aborficant, except in what passes for Inkstain's delusional mind. Not even the article discussed that.
|
|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote: <quoted text>The effects of too much Xanax on the planet ZEF.
JMO. Or not enough @@.
|
|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
Ink wrote: <quoted text>
Are you sure the embryo died , dr foo? lol If a woman had such "extensive injurites to her abdomen and her uterus had to be removed" as you claimed? Yes. Hope you're lauging at yourself Inkstain. You can join all the others here laughing at you too.
|
|
“I'm here with bells on.”
Since: Jul 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
sassy Jm wrote: <quoted text>Oh my...lookie we have here....an honest proabort who flat out said YES to my question of if she supports the choice to abort. That's a first.
Of course I am okay with the CHOICE to gestate. Didn't I just say it like twice already? I don't think ANYONE should be forced to have sex or get pregnant. WHO here on this forum disagrees with me?
Sweetie,if you have a point,please get to it. My popcorn is getting cold. When the question is "Does a woman have a right to decide whether or not to attempt gestation?" my answer is an unequivocal 'yes'. I'm okay with the all the choices, which I've listed, and to which I will add the use of contraception, in whatever form she and her partner choose to practice. Notice, I didn't say "or." I said "and." Because I hold that responsibility for a born child resides with both parents, unless one is dead at the time of birth. Cold popcorn is greasy. I hope you enjoy grease, as the temperature of your snack food is entirely up to you. JMO.
|
|
Since: Sep 08
Fulton, NY
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
Ink wrote: <quoted text>
No but in both cases you would be ending the pregnancy without an abortion. That is the comparison. I have to explain everything to you. Except its NOT a comparison you idiot. For one thing, there was NO accident, it was a figment of the Skanks' moronic imagination. The law in the Dominican Republic actually DOES discuss this, something you'd know if you bothered to actually look it up rather than mouth off like the imbicile you are.
|
|
“I'm here with bells on.”
Since: Jul 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote: <quoted text>Or not enough @@. In my particular case 'none' is quite enough. I'm not a fan of 'out of body experiences.' Xanax induced those, the one time I ingested it. Won't happen again, if I have any input, which, unless I'm in a coma, I will. :)
|
|
“Duke City ”
Since: Jun 08
Atrisco Village
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote: <quoted text>
Oh, so she should have given up sex becasue she was sick?@@
Spoken like someone that couldn't get laid if her life depended on it.
Who says she knew she was sick BEFORE she got pregnant Skanky?
I dont understand why idiots like you dont think before you say something stupid. Sassy has no idea how important sex/intimacy is to the terminally ill. It is one of the things that a very sick person expresses a wish to do with their partner before they die. Unfortunately, it's not always possible, but they deserve a chance to be as intimate as possible. The sex act gives the couple comfort and a sense of normalcy.
|
|
“Duke City ”
Since: Jun 08
Atrisco Village
|
Please wait...
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote: <quoted text>
**sighs**
You two are truly the blind leading the stupid.
If she had "extensive injurites to her abdomen and her uterus had to be removed" the fetus would be dead already you idiot. Just when one thinks Ink can't write anything more stupid, she once again exceeds herself.
|
|
“Duke City ”
Since: Jun 08
Atrisco Village
|
Please wait...
Ink wrote: <quoted text>
Do you know a lot of women with prostrate cancer?
We were discussing life saving chemo treatments. lol... Whoosh-----> right over your head, baby.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|
Pisces
