Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 309953 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“docendo discimus”

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#251286 Aug 4, 2012
1 Brilliant Chicky wrote:
Well its been fun watching the losers play games but busy day ahead.
Some people deserve all the misfortune they have suffered in life!!
Ive heard that some people think that a soul chooses its parents. I guess that means some smart little soul might change its mind last minute in order to dodge that bullet.
Of course I don't believe in any of that nonsense but I do think some souls HAVE in fact dodged the bullet of ignorance and selfishness that would have screwed up their poor little lives!!
Well, hopefully, you'll learn something about life, through nature, on your journey here, and come back respecting life, not being such a bitter old hag, wishing misfortune on others.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#251287 Aug 4, 2012
Badaxe wrote:
<quoted text>Well, hopefully, you'll learn something about life, through nature, on your journey here, and come back respecting life, not being such a bitter old hag, wishing misfortune on others.
You have a lot more faith than I do.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

#251288 Aug 5, 2012
H_
1 Brilliant Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been to Bryce. Wanted him to see it (and the grand canyon). I got to take a helicopter tour and it was awesome. I wanted to take him and hike a little but he is not having it. So tomorrow a local hike, gondola ride, a gold mine tour, a ghost tour and the next day, some souvenir shopping for the grands. Having a blast!
Sounds like a blast! What part of Colorado are you in?

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251289 Aug 5, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Then prove I lied. Or give it up already.
Are you hammered ? YOU are the one who lied and said I left off the word "right" in my discussion with Bitter. The onus is on you to prove it. How could I possibly prove you lied ? How could I possible prove that a post DOESN'T exist ?
You tell me and I'll do it right now.

I maintain that you posted that you are a lying moron.
Prove I'm lying.

My patience with you has thinned into nonexistence.
Your patience with ME !?! It's been almost a year of you stalling saying you're going to find the proof of your lie....proof you said would be EASY to find. And your patience with ME is thinning ?????
I did not lie and you know it.
Yes you did. If you hadn't you'd have come up with the proof by now.
In a nutshell, you falsely accused me of calling you a liar before I actually did.
So at some point you DID lie ? After I accused you of lying ? What does this even mean ?

You have created and perpetuated your own (false) sense of victimization while screaming I have somehow wronged you. Get over it already. Be the man you claim you are and stop acting so f'n prissy with false airs of superiority.
I meant what I said. You'll probably have to wait until October, and that's only if I'm still feeling generous with your controlling butt.
I have confidence I am correct; some of your posts with Bitner left off the word "right". I had been curious if you'd done it on purpose or accident, but now don't care on way or the other, but would lean toward purposely.
October ? Fine. You can have till December. I ain't rushing you.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251290 Aug 5, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for your kind words, Doctor Detroit.
Don't mention it. Anything for a fellow Ranger fan.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251291 Aug 5, 2012
grumpy wrote:
<quoted text>Well, well. Now there's proof that you do refer to a mother's "right".
Sure I did. And plenty of PC here have referred to fetal rights. Doesn't mean they agree with them.

Back to bed grumpster.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251292 Aug 5, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
(The rest of your crap was deleted because it was bullshit)
Wait a second ! you don't get to call something I wrote bullshit and then delete it. The fact is you accused me of evading you and that this was the "3rd time" you attempted to get a resposnse, yet you subsequently admitted that you didn't have time to look for the response that DID exist. You don't get to contradict yourself and then claim the proof of your contradiction is bullshit.

(The rest of your post was deleted because its bullshit )

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251293 Aug 5, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"I only called ONE person homophobe. That is until now...."
Yes, and you said that one person was pbfa.
Yet here you are a couple of months ago calling me a "homophobe".
Oh, Doc technicality. I was a "homophobic little scaliwag". The same, but in Doc's world different.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/allentown-pa/...
Doc's not above admitting he was wrong. I guess I did call you a homophobe. And in hindsight and based on what you've said, looks like my accusation was dead on balls accurate.

Homophobe.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251294 Aug 5, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee, maybe they'll get raped one day so you can support and advocate for the rapist. Any women around YOU should head for the hills, pronto.
Rapist-lover = DOC
It is YOU that has advocated for rapists. You would prefer that woman do NOT report their rape because of hardships they may endure as part of the American judicial process. You would prefer that rapists remain free to continue to ply their trade on more innocent unsuspecting victims. You are a rapists best friend. More women are vulnerable and potential victims because of you.
Doc on the other hand would prefer to see all rapes reported and all scumbag rapists prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

You are a rapist's dream.

You are vile.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251295 Aug 5, 2012
BrilliantChickie1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha! Good Catch, Grumpy!!
Poor, poor, DocPuppet.
Good catch ? I saw you refer to fetal rights. Good catch on my part ? Dope.

Where do you want me to start with your lies ?

Here's one.....

Remember when CD acknowledged that RvW indeed did use the existing medical definition of viability (with medical assistance) and thereby set legal precedent for the definition of viability.....and you tried to claim that that is what you have been saying all along....."OVER AND OVER" ?

When in fact you claimed just the opposite....that the defintion of viability was WITHOUT medical assistance. And you claimed that RvW did not establish legal precedent, that their definition of viability was in the "discussion" part of the opinion and not in their ruling.

Post #240588:

Chicky:
"Wrong you idiot. Section ix IS the historical discussion. Jeezefuckinglouise your stupid. They have their findings at the end of the case. Try reading it. That's the ruling. You dummies misinterpreted the discussion ie their thought process, as the ruling and your JUST PLAIN WRONG."

I've got more....this is just the tip of your stupid iceberg.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251296 Aug 5, 2012
pupsilicious wrote:
"Grey is the devil's favorite color"?

You didn't read the book. You got your info fed to you from some Catholic propaganda site. Your opinion stands at being meaningless. I won't take the opinion of someone who didn't even read the content of the book.

*You clearly show that you don't thoroughly research things and then form your own opinion.

*You clearly don't think for yourself.

*You clearly show that you just go by what is spoonfed to you by your religious leaders.

Unless you actually read the book, which you didn't, then your opinion means nothing.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251297 Aug 5, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
Doc Degall wrote: <quoted text>
" I just wanna get a sense of where you stand.
So your support of legal abortion is not based at all on a woman's right to personal autonomy?
I still haven't gotten a straight answer."
LNM answered (8/21)....
"Is this like that whole thing with Bitner? Where we'll go over this to death because you want me to say specifically I support abortion? Personally I don't like abortion and would not choose to get one. I also support other women's freedom to make their own choice just as I have done. So read those last two sentences very carefully because that is your answer. And if you don't think that's a straight answer then <shrug> I don't know what to tell ya."
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/allentown-pa/...
LNM wrote (8/24)....
"BTW, you had asked me where I stand on abortion, so did you see my response? I don't want to hear from you months from now claiming that I never responded to your question."
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/allentown-pa/...
Doc Degall wrote:<quoted text> (8/1)
"Nope. I answer em all. You must've just missed it.
Besides, why would I ask you your opinion on abortion anyway ? I already know it. Have known it for a while."
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
Yet you had written...
Doc Degall wrote: <quoted text>
"I just wanna get a sense of where you stand."
"I still haven't gotten a straight answer."
I gave you a straight answer, an you ignored it. And now you denied even asking the question, but then insisted that you hadn't ignored my answer....to the question you claim your didn't ask
You're a mess.
Got me again. You're absolutely right.....I did not respond to that post.
And I was right.....I did NOT ask you your postion on abortion. I already know your position on abortion and RvW.
What I was asking was if that position you held on abortion was based on a woman's right to personal autonomy. You did not give me a straight answer. Your answer was simply more paranoia regarding your perception that I was trying to get you to say you aupported abortion.
Now if you give me a straight answer, I'll respond.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251298 Aug 5, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
He uses slightly different wordings, flat-out denials, and the hope people won't bother to find the posts in question.
Bullshit. I welcome people going back and finding the posts in question. I URGE them to. Ask Katie.
I must say your work in going back almost 3 months to find a post to try and prove Doc wrong....was exemplary. Katie could take a page outta your book. She's too busy to look though.

I got a good laugh out of he recent use of the term "per se". LMAO!
Did you look it up and now know what it means ? You can thank me for improving your vocabulary.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251299 Aug 5, 2012
pupsee wrote:
<quoted text>
Little House on the Prairie is probably X rated in her eyes ..
I think a good couple chapters of that book would do knit a world of good .. Look out Mr. Knitty .. ROFLMAO
You see how so many of those fire and brimstone fundie preachers end up having affairs and hidden closet perversions, so I wouldn't take her complaints very seriously. She's just doing what her church masters tell her to do. Baa baa baa goes the sheep.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#251300 Aug 5, 2012
Susanm wrote:
<quoted text>
How many times have you been banned now?
Chickensh*t loves to make things up, she is not in Colorado at all.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#251301 Aug 5, 2012
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
It is YOU that has advocated for rapists. You would prefer that woman do NOT report their rape because of hardships they may endure as part of the American judicial process. You would prefer that rapists remain free to continue to ply their trade on more innocent unsuspecting victims. You are a rapists best friend. More women are vulnerable and potential victims because of you.
Doc on the other hand would prefer to see all rapes reported and all scumbag rapists prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
You are a rapist's dream.
You are vile.
LIAR.

You are delusional.

You want to FORCE a child to go to court to PROVE her rape (which was your ORIGINAL SCENARIO until you were shamed into changing it, with no admission of err on your part, of course, you just pretended you felt this way all along) in order for her to get a pass for an abortion that was already obtained, or else the VICTIM would have been PENALIZED in some unnamed way (since you are too much of a coward to admit your err) IF the rape could not be proven, as many can NOT.

You felt ALL of this originally, you VILE SCUM.

ANYONE who thinks the way you did ORIGINALLY (PENALIZE the RAPE VICTIM) is a sick pile of feces. I don't care if you changed your story, clearly you saw NOTHING WRONG with SUBJECTING a CHILD to PUNISHMENT for being raped yet unable to prove it.

You make me SICK.

Makes one wonder how many rapists are in your family, and what other nasty secrets you are hiding. I hope you don't have a daughter. I can only imagine what she has been subject to in your dark household.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251302 Aug 5, 2012
pupsee wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL !! Everyone also knows that it doesn't stay on the shelves very long either .. You are such a prude, knit .. ;)
What a shame Knit doesn't work up this kind of outrage over priests raping children. Nope, no outrage for that...but a book she didn't even read? She'll complain about that for awhile.

“Game on !”

Since: Aug 09

nyc

#251303 Aug 5, 2012
Badaxe wrote:
<quoted text>WTF are you talking about? Where did I say R v W gave rights to fetuses? I never said that, I was talking about the fact that you got banned again, dumbass, nice dodge, and lie, again.
I can vouch that you never argued for fetal rights.
Katie laughably tried to provide proof that you did and all she did was reiterate what RvW said. She's almost as stupid as chicky.
Almost.

Also, remember dicky's continued insistence that we provide the cut and paste where RVW established the definition of viability....and when we did she ridiculously tried to claim that it was in the discussion and not their ruling....and therefore was not legal precedent ?
Does stupid reach a higher level than that ?

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#251304 Aug 5, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Grey is the devil's favorite color"?
You didn't read the book. You got your info fed to you from some Catholic propaganda site. Your opinion stands at being meaningless. I won't take the opinion of someone who didn't even read the content of the book.
*You clearly show that you don't thoroughly research things and then form your own opinion.
*You clearly don't think for yourself.
*You clearly show that you just go by what is spoonfed to you by your religious leaders.
Unless you actually read the book, which you didn't, then your opinion means nothing.
Actually I skimmed through the book, not my type a book, filthy and disgusting and the book IS PORN. Any woman who buys that book is supporting the porn business which degrades women.

“Dan IS the Man”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#251305 Aug 5, 2012
pupsee wrote:
<quoted text>
First she hijacks my name on here (pups) then she is letting on she lives near Chicky ?! Chicky and I should be impressed ..
@@ Whoo hoo .. she loves us, she loves us not !!
Then she's a fool (which we already know) because she had to type the name in, which is why her location is in black and Chicky's real location is in blue.

She's been on other threads talking to herself using the name "Husker". She's still fouling the air over Nebraska...Colorado is safe.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Entertainment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Cruz supports federal relief for Texas floods; ... 59 min Go Blue Forever 26
News In embrace of 'Duck Dynasty' star, 2016 hopeful... (Dec '13) 2 hr Tazo 478
News Steve Martin reflects on nearly 5 decades in Ho... 2 hr Marvin 1
News I Was Bitten: The Walker County Incident 3 hr cann 15
News San Clemente Our Town 3 hr Modenaro 2
News What's at Stake for the Duggars if TLC Cancels ... 4 hr Tazo 3
News Huckabee defends Josh Duggar molesting sisters:... 6 hr yup 55
More from around the web