Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>Actually, I reposted them numerous times, as did La, Chicky and many others over the years.
But hey, I'd like to see you prove that Lynniekins. After all, wasn't it just YOU that said "just your because I said so" doesn't mean shit.

Again, you word about something isn't proof. Your word about something is pretty much a guarantee it's a lie, because it's been proven so often that if you're posting you're lying. Many PLers have proven it since I've been here, including me. You can't even be trusted to remember what YOU posted, you bonehead. As IF you can be trusted to remember what others you don't liek posted. lol.

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
Exactly. Same with when I agree with your posts.

{{{smile & waves}}}

Hi Lily Lynnie!!!

Do you get all tingly in your funzone region when you read Doc's posts?{winky winky}

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>Actually, I reposted them numerous times, as did La, Chicky and many others over the years.
But hey, I'd like to see you prove that Lynniekins. After all, wasn't it just YOU that said "just your because I said so" doesn't mean shit.

lol, no, not my claim, not my responsibility to prove it. CD made a claim he couldn't prove. Instead of posting a bunch of irrelevant bullshit, why don't you find those posts he claims exist and prove his claim on that particular subject matter he made the claim about?

Again, you word about something isn't proof. Your word about something is pretty much a guarantee it's a lie, because it's been proven so often that if you're posting you're lying. Many PLers have proven it since I've been here, including me. You can't even be trusted to remember what YOU posted, you bonehead. As IF you can be trusted to remember what others you don't like posted. lol.

pupsilicious wrote:

<quoted text> Hi Ladi, did the doctors clear up your lymphodema yet? Did TLC call you to do a new half ton lady reality show?

You must be possessed by a demon to keep spewing such hateful garbage.

Btw, if you do go to confession, you're living proof it doesn't do a damn thing. You continue to commit the same sins each day.

Lynnie Lily is on a roll again! pages and pages on idiocy now! Deny Lily deny! C'mon! Write dozens of long posts denying you're Lynnie!

HA! I'm gonna grab some snacks a and a coffe and dig in for plenty the Lynnie Lily Laugh~A~Palooza!!!!

LadiLulu wrote:

<quoted text>
Even the skank threw her sorry butt under the bus.

No she didn't, and you keep trying to run with thast same lie, even after she posted the truth. You're all liars. She made it very clear just recently the last time you lied about this, that what she said in another thread was about Persevere. Epic fail, Toots.

Doc Degall wrote:

<quoted text>
Not true. She's 100% right about viability. That's a fact.
Just for the record, what's your take on BC's position that an otherwise healthy preemie born at 34 weeks that might need some temporay artificial assistance to breathe....is non viable. You agree ?
<quoted text>
She's also right about me never asking Bitter if she supported abortion. Never happened like Katie says it did. I always included the "right" to abortion in my discussions with the paranoid one.
...

If they're posting, they're lying. The whole lot of them.

Doc Degall wrote:

<quoted text>
This one's over now. She's done. Toast.

This one's been over for some time now.

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
No, the thing is; you people post lies and we've proven it repeatedly. The other thing is; he didn't prove his claim and you haven't posted a thing to help him prove his claim.
The other thing is; your obsessions with a poster or posting things said by a poster that are not relevant to what CD claimed, aren't proof of his claims. It's all nonsense having nothing to do with anything.

You are a fantastic troll.

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
"Do you think the RvW court made up the word viable and then defined it you fool?"

That's what she believe we meant, the pea brain.
She doesn't even know what "defined" means. She believe we misunderstood what she was saying, when the truth is; she wasn't saying anything factual and didn't understand what we were meaning in saying RvW defined viability from the start.
Her argument was over from the moment she started it.

Doc Degall wrote:

<quoted text>
This one's over now. She's done. Toast.

"The definition of human viability: a historical perspective.
<snip>
RESULTS:
Over the years, many authors have debated the concept of the limit of human viability, starting from Ballantyne in the early 1900. The definition differs from author to author.

CONCLUSION:
The definition of human viability is still under discussion. It depends primarily, but not only, on gestational age. A number of genetic, cultural, social and technological variables are also influential. This definition could have an impact on legislation and the widespread misunderstanding of this concept in the lay public could also be enhanced by a frank discussion among clinicians and other professionals."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19814750

-----

"Limits of Human Viability in the United States: A Medicolegal Review
<snip>
During this time, the landmark US Supreme Court case of Roe v Wade legalized abortion in the United States. This legislation developed a trimester framework for gestational age, establishing that abortions in the third trimester could be performed only if the health of the mother was in jeopardy, which implied that a fetus was legally viable at 28 weeks.13 Subsequent cases during this decade failed to establish alternative legal definitions of viability. In 1976, Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v Danforth determined that viability was achieved at different times for each pregnancy and, therefore, was a matter of judgment of the attending physician.14 Three years later, Colautti v Franklin rejected a Pennsylvania statute that would have required physicians to protect the life of a potentially viable fetus either during or after an abortive procedure, ruling instead that the determination of viability was to be performed on a case-by-case basis.15"
<snip>
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content...

-----

FTR, I do not believe you, Triple L, and BA are completely correct regarding the claim that Roe legally defined VIABILITY.

LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:

<quoted text>
Nobodys said they ARE made by you as Lily,..

Exactly! Now you're getting it. lol. Your proof isn't proof at all. I'm LILY. When I ask for proof of what I supposedly posted, I'm obviously talking about MY posts, bonehead. You people can't deal with the content of my posts and prove it every time you think you're proving something with Lynne's posts. All you prove is that you can't prove your claims about ME.

Conservative Democrat wrote:

<quoted text>
And what would it be, in your "expert" opinion, the "something" to which I feel a need to prove?
"I'm very secure in what I know is the truth," yet you continue to deny that "lil Lily" is actually LynneD. Yet, I'm sure you're so secure in what you know is the truth that you are about to tell me what is the "something" to which I feel a need to prove.
Go figure!!

What does a message forum have to do with real life? Nothing. I AM very secure in the truth about my own real life. I don't need to come bragging about my real life to a bunch of strangers who are idiots, and when you find posts made by ME,(Lily), then we'll talk.

"And what would it be, in your "expert" opinion, the "something" to which I feel a need to prove?"

You tell me, fool. What ARE you trying to prove by posting your alleged medical record and that you bike 200 miles a week, that you have this kind of wife, that kind of child, this possession or that possession, this kind of money in the bank, that kind of job...

What do you think you're proving by making a bunch of claims to strangers whom you can't prove a word you say?

What IS you reason for doing that, CD? lol

What do you think you're proving by making a bunch of claims to strangers (to )whom you can't prove a word you say?

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
They're ignorance is amplified in their stupid choices to keep arguing with us and trying to oppose THE FACTS.

Idiot. You don't even know why ^^^^ this is funny. Lynne, you never fail to make us laugh.

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>
No. You're a little late Chicky.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
165176
posted a year ago.
Katie, Foo et all have already obsessively posted "Lynne" posts trying to prove I'm Lynne. You're not trying anything new. NO ONE but PC boneheads who lie whenever they post care about such stupidity.
The rest care about content of posts, of which you boneheads have nothing intelligent, sensible, rational or relevant in yours.

So long as you lie about being Lynne D, there is NO content to your posts -- any of 'em. Noncredible is what your denials make you with everyone who reads the contents of the posts.

lil Lily wrote:

<quoted text>No. You're a little late Chicky.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
165176

posted a year ago.

Katie, Foo et all have already obsessively posted "Lynne" posts trying to prove I'm Lynne. You're not trying anything new. NO ONE but PC boneheads who lie whenever they post care about such stupidity.

The rest care about content of posts, of which you boneheads have nothing intelligent, sensible, rational or relevant in yours.

Yeah, sure, Lynne.
.
Bonehead, if your not denying you're Lynne, you are proving you are.

So, you have just officially and specifically ADMITTED you ARE Lynne.

Thanks.

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
So long as you lie about being Lynne D, there is NO content to your posts -- any of 'em. Noncredible is what your denials make you with everyone who reads the contents of the posts.

I guess you didn't get the memo. Here's a repeat of it:~I don't care what PC boneheaded people who post lies think of me or the content of my posts.~

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
So long as you lie about being Lynne D, there is NO content to your posts -- any of 'em. Noncredible is what your denials make you with everyone who reads the contents of the posts.

She loves the attention her denial is bringing her. How pathetic that someone holds onto this juvenile little game just to bathe in the negative attention it brings.

Brilliant_Chicky wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, sure, Lynne.
.
Bonehead, if your not denying you're Lynne, you are proving you are.
So, you have just officially and specifically ADMITTED you ARE Lynne.
Thanks.

^^Said in reply to a post in which I provided a link of a post I made a year ago in May 2011, letting this pea brain know I've already denied it, A YEAR AGO, so anything she thinks or says about me has already been tried and posted about long before her doing it now.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...

165176
Which says, "I'm not Lynne and I'm not lying in any of my posts about what you've said."

This idiot Chicky posts in reply, "Bonehead, if your not denying you're Lynne, you are proving you are."

What?! lol

WTH kind of logic is that? LOL

The bonehead then says, "So, you have just officially and specifically ADMITTED you ARE Lynne."

I have not admitted any such thing, "officially" or any other moronic way.

What a BONEHEAD. lol

LadiLulu wrote:

<quoted text>
She loves the attention her denial is bringing her. How pathetic that someone holds onto this juvenile little game just to bathe in the negative attention it brings.

"How pathetic that someone holds onto this juvenile little game just to bathe in the negative attention it brings."

That has you PC boneheads written all over it. lol

Hey Toots, you want to know what's really pathetic? Idiots like you who think that way, and who think that someone else is playing a juvenile little game, when YOU people who are the only ones playing it. YOU'RE the pathetic people who keep giving someone what YOU think they're wanting to "bathe" in. You're the only ones who created and are "holding onto" this juvenile little game.