Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Full story: Newsday 308,963
Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision. Full Story

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#244027 Jun 16, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ackk!!
Is that Lynne?
Sure. Why not?

: D

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244028 Jun 16, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
It's like I recently mentioned to La; they minimize the facts, magnify their emotional BS. Then they have the audacity to try and prove us wrong. It's idiotic. And I am feeling like the biggest idiot of all for continuing it.
These people are not wanting to see what the consequences of removing women's reproductive civil rights will be (Brazil, China anyone?). They are not wanting to face it head-on (depleted resources, starvation, not enough fresh water). They only want to "defend" an unformed, insentient ZEF completely lacking in a guaranteed, healthy birth and to hell with everyone else. Even themselves, even their own daughters, their own granddaughters and any generations following (if there are generations following). They refuse to learn. And still point their crooked little fingers at us.
Well, Katie, these extreme anti choicers stubborn, willful, ignorance is no reflection on you. I know how you feel about continuing it. Its difficult to let their ignorant bullshit stand unchallenged, especially when they start lying outright about what we have said. Or twisting what we have said to suit their straw man arguments. It doesn't seem to matter that what we have stated and linked and explained is all right there in writing to disprove their deceptive claims.

It is not about saving the fetuses. Its about the power the get when they dream about being able to force their will on others against their own will. The men want to control women who they see as inferior. The women want to control other women they way the men in their lives, or their religions, or their own choices in life, control them. Its almost pitiful. It is definitely contemptible.

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244029 Jun 16, 2012
LyingLILLynne D is at it again. 7 posts on one page frantically attempting to defend her stupid bullshit.

ANd she thinks she isn't proving she IS Lynne D!! LMAO
STO

Vallejo, CA

#244030 Jun 16, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
"I did what I knew you expected to use to try to prove something, and in doing so I proved that you couldn't prove anything with it."
You repliled to a post of mine, where I challenged you to reply to it in order to prove you are LynneD.
So how can you say that you proved I can't prove anything with it? If you really wanted to prove I can't prove anything with it, you would have kept your pie hole sown shut.
But you didn't.
Lynne, you're Shande to yourself and to everyone who sticks up for you.
CD, Lynne's given all the proof necessary. She refuses to post the words "I do not have the same SS# and DNA as the poster PCers know as Lynne D."

All she'd have to do is post that under her lil Lilly name, and I'd drop it.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#244031 Jun 16, 2012
Katie yesterday:
Katie wrote:
Oh looky here at this pattern of PCers showing PLers up and then getting banned. Like I was the week after Easter, two weeks after my ex passed away unexpectedly. Such wonderful displays of Xtianity.
STO is better than all of you put together. He shows up Doc and Lynne D without profanity (like my posts w/ warnings about profanity when none existed), but POOF! Gone.
You whinybaby reporters got nothing else, huh? If anyone should be banned, it should be Lynne D just for using and hording all the bandwidth.
STO today:
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
Course I do. So do you.
"In order for medical assistance to be effective the fetus must first be viable."
If a fetus isn't viable, it must have expired, according to your definition. You believe that definition can extend to embryos, given the hypothetical -- artificial uterus.
I'm not talking about disease or deformity. Stage of gestation, only. So don't try that deflective route.
Looks like STO isn't banned, Katie, you paranoid, lying NUT.

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244032 Jun 16, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"DEFYING" me again? You really are a glutton for punishment, aren't you? You do remember what happened the last time you "DEFIED" me to prove something, don't you? I prove you're a liar. I proved your memory is fried. I proved you are full of shit when you post.
Really? Where did you prove she was a liar?

I did not see where you proved she said you LIVED in Bangor, like you claimed she did.

Is that like where you claimed I said a that viability meant "born"?

You admitted that was a bullshitting lie.

YOU are the liar.

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#244033 Jun 16, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, Katie, these extreme anti choicers stubborn, willful, ignorance is no reflection on you. I know how you feel about continuing it. Its difficult to let their ignorant bullshit stand unchallenged, especially when they start lying outright about what we have said. Or twisting what we have said to suit their straw man arguments. It doesn't seem to matter that what we have stated and linked and explained is all right there in writing to disprove their deceptive claims.
It is not about saving the fetuses. Its about the power the get when they dream about being able to force their will on others against their own will. The men want to control women who they see as inferior. The women want to control other women they way the men in their lives, or their religions, or their own choices in life, control them. Its almost pitiful. It is definitely contemptible.
Agreed. And it is indicative of their woeful inadequacies that they desperately NEED to control complete strangers. On top of it all, to a one, they are incredibly dull-witted, so their attempts to twist our words is downright transparent and bizarre. They can barely comprehend or construct a coherent sentence.

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244034 Jun 16, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Google "pics of toddlers" you idiot. There's your proof. Toddlers are what I call "little" children.
Goodnight.*POOF* you're gone.
Wow. You are seriously weird. And ALWAYS wrong.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#244035 Jun 16, 2012
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no technicality. Maybe one you created in your fantasy world, I suppose. I certainly don't have to sign on to your crazy.
Again, you agree that I never bashed or mocked any abused girl. Therefore, sjm's accusations are false.
That's it. Why do you care if I ribbed Lynne, now and then? It was an insult fest. We were both in on it. Back and forth. Around and around. Sh*t, you shoulda seen some of the stuff she said to ME. lol
"Again, you agree that I never bashed or mocked any abused girl. Therefore, sjm's accusations are false."

No, I don't agree, so each time you claim I do, you're lying. Don't try to twist, because I do great keeping things straight.

"Why do you care if I ribbed Lynne, now and then? "

I don't care what you've said. I care about whether or not people are lying about what they've said, which you are.

Mocking anyone about being abused is not "teasing", it's not part of an "insult fest". You used a painful reality in someone's life. Are you suggesting she did the same to you. If so, what was the reality she mocked you about?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#244036 Jun 16, 2012
STO wrote:
<quoted text>
"STO claims he's not guilty of certain things; PLers prove he is and that his denials are lies."
You haven't proven anything, EXcept that I was telling the truth. That's makes you the liar.
You weren't telling the truth, and people who aren't PC idiots see it.
Katie

Kent, WA

#244037 Jun 16, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
Katie yesterday:
<quoted text>
STO today:
<quoted text>
Looks like STO isn't banned, Katie, you paranoid, lying NUT.
Riiight.'Cause he's signed in just like I am ohnotsosmartone.

“mama & baby”

Since: Oct 10

Pro Choice is Pro Life!

#244038 Jun 16, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? This email I posted HAD A DATE? That's your claim? Prove that Lynniekins.
Pssssst...you're not going to be able to, because I'm looking at the email, and there's no date in the body of the email I posted......
Your desperate lies are showing.
Funny, isn't it? She lies like we breathe. LyinLilLynneD is a practiced, accomplished, liar. Sad way to go through life.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#244039 Jun 16, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I don't shop at Wal-Mart. The only people that shop there in this area are flea-bitten slobs like you, sweetie.
Don't tease Lynne, hun. She's very sensitive.
You posted your own pic.You look like your drunk, I bet you drink Schlitz.
Katie

Kent, WA

#244040 Jun 16, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"Again, you agree that I never bashed or mocked any abused girl. Therefore, sjm's accusations are false."
No, I don't agree, so each time you claim I do, you're lying. Don't try to twist, because I do great keeping things straight.
"Why do you care if I ribbed Lynne, now and then? "
I don't care what you've said. I care about whether or not people are lying about what they've said, which you are.
Mocking anyone about being abused is not "teasing", it's not part of an "insult fest". You used a painful reality in someone's life. Are you suggesting she did the same to you. If so, what was the reality she mocked you about?
Obviously you are too invested in strangers' perception of Lynne D. Why don't you hug yourself and call it good? Have a good cry and move on already. You think you had it so bad and were mocked for being an abused teen rather than the blowhard know-it-all abrasive adult you show yourself to be here? On a message board you just got done explaining wasn't real life? Yeah... that makes sense ohnotsosmartone.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#244041 Jun 16, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure. Why not?
: D
Admit its you.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#244042 Jun 16, 2012
Doc Degall wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks !!!
Ya see where it says "...often used of a human fetus at seven months but may be interpreted according to the state of the art of medicine" ?
That statement could never be made if the definition was WITHOUT medical assistance.
Ya see also where it says the fetus is "considered viable when it weighs 500 grams or more and the pregnancy is over 20 weeks in duration" ? CONSIDERED VIABLE.......not that it has a chance to REACH viability as you said.
And this was supposed to prove you and dicky right and us wrong ???
Thanks again genius....for the hundredth and last time !!!
"Ya see where it says "...often used of a human fetus at seven months but may be interpreted according to the state of the art of medicine" ?"

Yeah, I see it. I'm not arguing with the definition. I'm arguing that you take it to the point of pure absudity. You think an embryo is viable in an artificial womb but not viable in a female's womb. That's just dumb, Doc.

"

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#244043 Jun 16, 2012
Brilliant_Chicky wrote:
LyingLILLynne D is at it again. 7 posts on one page frantically attempting to defend her stupid bullshit.
ANd she thinks she isn't proving she IS Lynne D!! LMAO
It's her friggin fingerprint, CP.
STO

Vallejo, CA

#244044 Jun 16, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
Katie yesterday:
<quoted text>
STO today:
<quoted text>
Looks like STO isn't banned, Katie, you paranoid, lying NUT.
No, I'm not banned. But I did get warned. Katie knows I didn't post anything that should be considered a bannable offense. So, her concern is appreciated.

Certainly, there was no lie. She didn't know either way, and guessed, given the circumstances. A hypothesis, if you will.

Why do you care? Were you afraid someone lied about me to the mods to get me banned?

“...sigh”

Since: Nov 09

Smithtown, NY

#244045 Jun 16, 2012
pupsilicious wrote:
<quoted text>..You look like your drunk, I bet you drink Schlitz.
My drunk what? My drunk priest? Nah, that would be your Fr. R.

Here he is, getting a load on before a kiddie party:

http://www.mathdreads.com/wp-content/uploads/...

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#244046 Jun 16, 2012
LadiLulu wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure. Why not?
: D
Here is your hunka hunka burnin' love... So both of you must drink a twelve pack of Schlitz a night, heh?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Entertainment Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
James Safechuck Claims Michael Jackson Kept Him... (May '14) 58 min TripleH1976 748
Shania Twain announces new, 'last' tour 3 hr Star On 47 2
DC's 'truth, honor' rally tests Glenn Beck's power (Aug '10) 4 hr ritedownthemiddle 4,128
R. Kelly: Does Liking His Album Mean You've For... (Dec '13) 5 hr your neighborhood dj 2
UK comedian spurring US to action 5 hr jeffry 1
'Star Trek 3' to shoot in Vancouver this summer 9 hr Mr Doom 2
Children's Book Authors: H.A. Rey and Margret R... 13 hr Logan 1
More from around the web