Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

grumpy wrote:

<quoted text>Someone posted a story about doctors removing 80% of a fetus' body. Would you support that woman's desire an abortion? Do you think adoption was a possible choice?

Judged:

1

1

1

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, the fact that she is the one who is pregnant does automatically grant her rights over that life. The woman has absolute rights over any that the fetus may have, morally and legally. Please, go ahead and try to stop her from exercising her right, whether it be staying pregnant or aborting. Let's see what happens.

Judged:

1

1

1

Tom Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I think you are mistaken.

Judged:

1

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>She'd probably send the poor child to some fundie camp for an intervention or some weirdness like that. Lol

Judged:

2

2

1

sassychic wrote:

<quoted text>No clue what a grub is lol. My computer likes to change my words.
You post is a lie. You didnt grow up in a Christian home if your Mom was active in the culture of death movement.
Nothing wrong with questioning btw. I believe thats how we learn.

Judged:

1

1

1

sassychic wrote:

<quoted text> You can say what you wish about me but that wouldn't change facts. Elise didnt grow up in a Christian home. That's a fact. Her Mom supported kiling and raised her daughter to believe that killing her grandchild was okay.
By the fruits you'll know them.....

Judged:

2

2

1

elise in burque wrote:

<quoted text>Don't worry about it. That woman is pure hypocrisy. Who cares what she spews?

Judged:

1

1

Tom Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
If you are going to reference Roe v. Wade, be accurate. It does specifically reference "unborn children". Ssorry about that for you proaborts.
So in the future try to be accurate, pagan.

zef wrote:

<quoted text>
The Nazi leadership used a series of legal mechanisms -- which, in contrast to the revolutionary overthrow of power in 1918, judges tended to consider legitimate -- to gradually assume and consolidate Hitler's power. Then, step by step, and always under the guise of safeguarding the state, the Nazi leadership imposed legislation that fulfilled its ideological goals of rearmament, military expansion, and racial purification. Throughout the 1930s and especially after the Nazi regime began World War II in 1939, the judiciary typically rendered verdicts according to the principles of Nazi ideology and the wishes of the Führer. Over the 12 years of Nazi rule, during which time judges heard countless cases, most not only upheld the law but interpreted it in broad and far-reaching ways that facilitated, rather than hindered, the Nazis' ability to carry out their agenda.

Judged:

1

1

1

Tom Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Excellent post! She compares her atheist nest to the master race". I guess she plans to keep them vacuum sealed from the rest of the rational world.

sassychic wrote:

<quoted text> Removing artificial lifesupport is not comparable to killing a healthy developing humans life. If your Dad went into a coma after a freak accident, youd have no right to end his life if he had hope for full recovery. He'd have to be gravely ill or have definitive issues that would ultimately alter his life.
A human ALWAYS starts out in the womb while developing. He/She is suppose to be there. Abortion kills a life that will eventually go on to be able to sustain life without moms help.

Judged:

1

1

1

sassychic wrote:

<quoted text>Suppose one of your grandchildren decides that they are interested in God and ask to learn more. Will you respect their choices?

Judged:

1

1

Kathwynn wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry grumpy what roe does do is is that it found rights with in the Roe V Wade that gave women autonomy over their bodies and reproduction. Like any right it comes with responsibilities and restrictions.
It is about the woman right to make a medical decision. no where in Roe does it say that any State should or must proscribe or regulate. Only that it can. With the proviso that the health and life of the pregnant woman is taken into account.
No where with in Roe v Wade will you find any mention of a fetus having any rights or even alluding to such an outlandish proposition.
At the end Roe V Wade is a good decision. It has stood and as the Supreme Court in 1992 in
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey made clear. There is no chance of Roe V Wade ever being overturned.

Judged:

1

sassychic wrote:

<quoted text>such as?

Judged:

1

1

1

Brilliant_Chicky wrote:

<quoted text>
Should I respect every choice another person makes? Is that what you morons are suggesting? That because I support a woman's right to decide how to handle her own private pregnancy, I should support every choice every person ever makes? Really? Pathetic.
All children should learn about all the mythical gods. Gods are myths. That's. a fact. They can also learn about world religions. That's a legitimate course of study. Learning about crusades and inquisitions and genocides and child molestations and the abuse of poor families and witch hunts as a result of a religious mindset are all historical facts they should be aware of. Religion is damaging to society and that is knowledge they should have.
Your turn. If your daughter decided to become an atheist, would you respect that choice? No because YOU'RE all about control. Unlike your pretend god that grants "free will". Hypocrite.
What if she chose to continue a life threatening pregnancy that will kill her and the wad of cells? Would you respect that choice? What if she chose abortion to save her own life? Would you respect her for that? Do tell.

zef wrote:

<quoted text>
The Nazi leadership used a series of legal mechanisms -- which, in contrast to the revolutionary overthrow of power in 1918, judges tended to consider legitimate -- to gradually assume and consolidate Hitler's power. Then, step by step, and always under the guise of safeguarding the state, the Nazi leadership imposed legislation that fulfilled its ideological goals of rearmament, military expansion, and racial purification. Throughout the 1930s and especially after the Nazi regime began World War II in 1939, the judiciary typically rendered verdicts according to the principles of Nazi ideology and the wishes of the Führer. Over the 12 years of Nazi rule, during which time judges heard countless cases, most not only upheld the law but interpreted it in broad and far-reaching ways that facilitated, rather than hindered, the Nazis' ability to yrry out their agenda.