PETA Targets Celebrity Chef Fans With New 'Silent Scream' Ad Spot

Judged:

2

2

1

Laurie Caring-Stalker wrote:

Hello, John!=)
Hope you've had an excellent weekend!(((HUGS)))

Judged:

1

1

1

Laurie Caring-Stalker wrote:

Lol! A good stress reliever, eh?=D
I figured it was late there. Hope you enjoy your 2 days off!
G'night, John...dream sweetly when it's time.
(((HUGS)))

Judged:

1

1

1

Wade Gustafson wrote:

Fish have such a decentralized nervous system that they cannot actually feel pain.

Judged:

2

2

2

Chilli J wrote:

I'm new to this thread and just might be missing something. Perhaps some of you "regular" posters here can inform me. Ideally, we'd ignore the troll and let IT continue to angrily, cluelessly bloviate until it finally starves for attention.
My question is this. What's so "special" about this one that we'd collectively continue to feed IT? I've taken a couple of minutes to spot check some of ITS priors and can't find any rational, redeeming support IT has offered for its rants.
Admittedly, ITS posts are hilarious. And ITS responses are predictable, perhaps even Pavlovian. However, is this particular troll that much fun to poke with a posting stick, to see IT assume, insult, label, judge, personally attack, whine?
Do what you want. I'm personally already bored with IT. I just wondered what the motivation was to collectively bother with, to post to this head case? BTW troll, no need to respond to this post, it's about you, not directed to you.:)

Judged:

1

1

Chilli J wrote:

I'm new to this thread and just might be missing something. Perhaps some of you "regular" posters here can inform me. Ideally, we'd ignore the troll and let IT continue to angrily, cluelessly bloviate until it finally starves for attention.
My question is this. What's so "special" about this one that we'd collectively continue to feed IT? I've taken a couple of minutes to spot check some of ITS priors and can't find any rational, redeeming support IT has offered for its rants.
Admittedly, ITS posts are hilarious. And ITS responses are predictable, perhaps even Pavlovian. However, is this particular troll that much fun to poke with a posting stick, to see IT assume, insult, label, judge, personally attack, whine?
Do what you want. I'm personally already bored with IT. I just wondered what the motivation was to collectively bother with, to post to this head case? BTW troll, no need to respond to this post, it's about you, not directed to you.:)

Judged:

1

1

Christmas Hunter wrote:

<quoted text>Occasionally she will attempt to address the subject of discussion other than her blatant psychological problems.

Judged:

1

1

dragoon70056 wrote:

<quoted text>
Perhaps that's a sign that one of her personalities is almost sane?

Judged:

1

1

Christmas Hunter wrote:

<quoted text>LOL
Most certainly "almost". It would also seem that the "almost sane" personality is certainly the least dominant.

Judged:

1

1

Arf Arf wrote:

Ah PETa another group of leftist hippocrits. Enjoy this folks.
An excerpt follows.....The group is well-known for its edgy, graphic advertisements, its support for radical animal rights groups, and its throngs of celebrity supporters, from Charlize Theron to Tim Gunn.
But PETA has a lesser-known claim to fame that has critics fuming: The organization euthanizes over 90 percent of the dogs and cats relinquished to its headquarters in Norfolk, Va. In 2009, PETA euthanized 2,301 dogs and cats -- 97 percent of those brought in -- and adopted only eight, according to Virginia state figures. And the rate of these killings has been increasing. From 2004 to 2008, euthanasia at PETA increased by 10 percent.
Manpreet Romana, AFP / Getty Images
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals is coming under fire for euthanizing more than 90 percent of the dogs and cats relinquished to its Norfolk, Va., headquarters. Here, a PETA activist acts out a lesson on animal birth control in New Delhi last year.
The numbers are remarkable in contrast to nearby shelters. In the same town, the Norfolk City Pound euthanized 54.7 percent of its dogs and cats in 2009. In 2008, the most recent year on record, the Norfolk SPCA found homes for 86 percent of its dogs and cats and euthanized only 5.3 percent.
Read all about it here:
http://www.aolnews.com/2010/03/09/petas-eutha...
They should be renamed "People Euthanizing The Animals".
Arf-arf

Judged:

1

1

arctic wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for that depressing bit of information....

Judged:

1

1

Sangelia wrote:

<quoted text>
that is why I have been for years calling peta, a group of hypocrites.
since they claim to care for animals. and yet they turn around and do stuff like that.

Judged:

1

1

arctic wrote:

<quoted text>
A friend of mine posted PETAs new ad on facebook
earlier today.
The one w/the porn star....it's supposed to be
about spaying and neutering pets...not sure how
effective That's going to be. lol

Laurie Caring-Stalker wrote:

Correction:
Actions speak louder than OBSESSIVE RANTS.
Which is all you do. Over and over again.
If I'm wrong, don't reply.
Which you will. Your mental illness compels you to.

Judged:

1

1

1

hunters are COWARDS wrote:

<quoted text> You literally PAY for animals to suffer and die.