Alternative energy options getting easier
Alternative energy continues to be in the news, especially when gasoline prices are once again soaring.Full Story
#1 Feb 24, 2013
49 former NASA scientists and astronauts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting empirical evidence that calls the theory into question.
The group, which includes seven Apollo astronauts and two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, are dismayed over the failure of NASA, and specifically the Goddard Institute For Space Studies (GISS), to make an objective assessment of all available scientific data on climate change. They charge that NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance.
“These American heroes – the astronauts that took to space and the scientists and engineers that put them there – are simply stating their concern over NASA’s extreme advocacy for an unproven theory,” said Leighton Steward.“There’s a concern that if it turns out that CO2 is not a major cause of climate change, NASA will have put the reputation of NASA, NASA’s current and former employees, and even the very reputation of science itself at risk of public ridicule and distrust.”
#2 Feb 24, 2013
Our future is melting before our very eyes.
Fiddling With The Data While The World Burns
.. if global warming isn’t real and there’s an actual scientific debate about it, that should be reflected in the scientific journals.
Scientists do not disagree about human-caused global warming. It is the ruling paradigm of climate science, in the same way that plate tectonics is the ruling paradigm of geology. We know that continents move. We know that the earth is warming and that human emissions of greenhouse gases are the primary cause.
Only one conclusion is possible: within science, global warming denial has virtually no influence. Its influence is instead on a misguided media, politicians all-too-willing to deny science for their own gain, and a gullible public.
#3 Feb 24, 2013
Well who knows if that'll change anything. On the positive side, many people are generating their own electricity. There are some great guides out there on how to do this. A few of which are listed on this site www.diyenergyreview.com if you're interested?
Add your comments below
|Let's have a balanced plan for producing the el...||10 hr||Earthling-1||43|
|Study: Solar energy isna t just for rich libera...||Thu||Solarman||1|
|Expert: We must act fast on warming (Sep '08)||Thu||Earthling-1||27,342|
|Solar farms 'blight' on the countryside says Li...||Oct 22||maryjaneprincton||1|
|'The Solar Energy Potential for Desalination Pl...||Oct 22||Zach||3|
|Sustainable ambition on Lake Ontario: Waterfron...||Oct 22||winds of change||1|
|Electricity & Water Authority - Strategic SWOT ...||Oct 21||MOMIN ANSARI||1|
Find what you want!
Search Alternative Energy Forum Now