McKenna, Inslee take different approaches with green energy

Sep 29, 2012 Full story: The Olympian 31

Lying under a tree one unseasonably warm and dry March day, Jay Inslee writes, he realized why more people hadn't woken up to the danger of a changing climate.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#1 Sep 29, 2012
AGW isn't the decisive issue splitting Inslee & McKenna, tho they both have differing methods to address the issue.

But McKenna straps on the re-pubic-lick-un holster while he loads up his campaign pistol with bullets to increase pollution, decrease women's rights, ease dirty businesses operating inside & outside Washington state, & keep the poor, poor..... just like an in-line re-pubic-lick-un.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#2 Dec 26, 2012
Found this AGW thread hiding away.

Inslee won..... a double disaster avoided. It's President Obama & Governor Inslee.

Yeah, pollsters tried to make both races look like they were races. But Pres. Obama won handily & Governor Inslee won with a separation of 3.4 percentage points.

re-pubic-lick-uns really are the minority of the population. It only sounds like they are numerous, because they make a lot of noise & sneak around manipulating behind closed doors, without adhering to democracy.
PHD

Overton, TX

#3 Dec 27, 2012
Found this AGW thread hiding away."pinheadlitesout " gave a a repeat treat."pinheadlitesout " said I'm a pinheadlitesout/////

PHD said: Oh yes you are.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#4 Dec 27, 2012
phudd wrote:
phudd said: Oh yes you are.
It's still President Obama & Governor Inslee. Oh, yes, they are
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#5 Dec 27, 2012
litesong wrote:
It's President Obama & Governor Inslee.
Yeah, pollsters tried to make both races look like they were races. But Pres. Obama won handily & Governor Inslee won with a separation of 3.4 percentage points.
The pollsters made it look that both races were close, because they had to estimate how many racist people would vote. re-pubic-lick-uns culled racist votes for 50 years, as shown in:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politi...
//////////
Quoting from the article:
A new book about Strom Thurmond, the openly racist senator from South Carolina (he ran as a "Dixiecrat" against Truman in 1948) details how Thurmond's switch from the Democratic Party to the GOP in 1964 was the harbinger and instigator for that shift to a solidly Republican South. Eventually the party became somewhat less overt in its public statements but not in its appeal at the voting booth.
Which means in practice that the GOP starts out every presidential election with (depending on census changes in electoral vote numbers) some 100 electoral votes, more than a third of the way to the 270 electoral votes needed for victory.........
Is it an accident that these 100 votes come from the core states of the Old Confederacy—Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina?
(re-pubic-lick-uns) would be dead as a political party if not for the legacy of racism.
//////////
The South still remembers the 1960's. The racists are still 'fighting' the civil war.

PHD

Overton, TX

#6 Dec 28, 2012
pinheadlitesout wrote:
<quoted text>
The pollsters made it look that both races were close, because they had to estimate how many racist people would vote. re-pubic-lick-uns culled racist votes for 50 years, as shown in:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politi...
//////////
Quoting from the article:
A new book about Strom Thurmond, the openly racist senator from South Carolina (he ran as a "Dixiecrat" against Truman in 1948) details how Thurmond's switch from the Democratic Party to the GOP in 1964 was the harbinger and instigator for that shift to a solidly Republican South. Eventually the party became somewhat less overt in its public statements but not in its appeal at the voting booth.
Which means in practice that the GOP starts out every presidential election with (depending on census changes in electoral vote numbers) some 100 electoral votes, more than a third of the way to the 270 electoral votes needed for victory.........
Is it an accident that these 100 votes come from the core states of the Old Confederacy—Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina?
(re-pubic-lick-uns) would be dead as a political party if not for the legacy of racism.
//////////
The South still remembers the 1960's. The racists are still 'fighting' the civil war.
No that's not what Mr. Muller said.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#7 Dec 30, 2012
ph'd misses Muller. Poor troll.
PHD

Overton, TX

#8 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
ph'd misses Muller. Poor troll.
So you can't explain.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#9 Dec 30, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>So you can't explain.
You made a big mistake. Remember Mr. Miller.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#10 Dec 30, 2012
ph'd confuses Mr Muller and Mr. Miller.
PHD

Overton, TX

#11 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
ph'd confuses Mr Muller and Mr. Miller.
So you can't explain.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#12 Dec 30, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>So you can't explain.
This does it well:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
PHD

Overton, TX

#13 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
ph'd confuses Mr Muller and Mr. Miller.
Just to help you with your confusion both are Scientist.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#14 Dec 30, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Just to help you with your confusion both are Scientist.
[Oh with a capital letter.]

What are their first names?
PHD

Overton, TX

#15 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>[Oh with a capital letter.]
What are their first names?
Richard, Mathew, Christian and several more in the scientific world. Which would you prefer?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#16 Dec 30, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Richard, Mathew, Christian and several more in the scientific world. Which would you prefer?
Here we have a dummy, folks. It's ph'd.

Won't you go away, ph'd? You can't handle the heat of science.
PHD

Overton, TX

#17 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Here we have a dummy, folks. It's ph'd.
Won't you go away, ph'd? You can't handle the heat of science.
So you can't explain.Tooooo many names got you confused?
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#18 Dec 30, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>So you can't explain.Tooooo many names got you confused?
Two names, dummy.

You are out of your league here.
PHD

Overton, TX

#19 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Two names, dummy.
You are out of your league here.
So you can't explain. And yours being little league here dummy.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#20 Dec 30, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>So you can't explain. And yours being little league here dummy.
Repeat all night long, troll.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Alternative Energy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Renewable Energy: So Useless That Even Greenie ... 5 hr Fact Check 1
Expert: We must act fast on warming (Sep '08) 6 hr IBdaMann 27,638
SRP powers up new solar energy deal 10 hr Solarman 1
Editorial: PSC poised to side with Duke Energy,... Fri Solarman 1
Endura Energy Announces the Completion of a 284... Fri Liz 1
Signs of optimism on fuel (Dec '12) Nov 20 WILFRED 5
Texas Grid Operator Says Clean Energy Plan Coul... Nov 19 Solarman 1

Alternative Energy People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE