R.I.P. CaDad

If any of you are wondering why we haven't heard from the CaDad creature lately, apparently he's dead.
I received this communication from Angela.

"In response to your enquiries regarding a Mr. CaDad:
Sometime ago he was brought by ambulance to the emergency room. He had been involved in a late night car accident. He was in pretty bad shape, and it was difficult to assess his injuries.
As it was during the night, we were functioning with a minimal staff, and the only qualified people on duty were female. It was necessary to remove Mr. CaDad's clothing in order to assess and treat him. He was delirious, but still conscious, and protested and resisted everytime we attempted to cut away his bloody, torn clothing. I tried to explain that we needed to remove his clothing in order to treat him, and the severity of the car accident made me suspect that his injuries were possibly life threatening.
I finally told Mr. CaDad that we were going to remove his clothing and that was that, and if he didn't allow it, he could very well die. As I tried to cut away his shirt, he grabbed my wrist with his bloody hand, and stared right into my eyes. He said that he would rather die than have a female see him naked. His last words as he passed away were a mumbled "modesty and privacy must be protected at all times...".
While we waited for the coroner to arrive, I felt that we should cover the body. As there were no sheets available, I covered him with a plastic shower curtain from the ER bathroom. It seemed appropriate somehow."

Dr. Angela S.
Head ER Surgeon
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento,California

Bob wrote:

If any of you are wondering why we haven't heard from the CaDad creature lately, apparently he's dead.
I received this communication from Angela.
"In response to your enquiries regarding a Mr. CaDad:
Sometime ago he was brought by ambulance to the emergency room. He had been involved in a late night car accident. He was in pretty bad shape, and it was difficult to assess his injuries.
As it was during the night, we were functioning with a minimal staff, and the only qualified people on duty were female. It was necessary to remove Mr. CaDad's clothing in order to assess and treat him. He was delirious, but still conscious, and protested and resisted everytime we attempted to cut away his bloody, torn clothing. I tried to explain that we needed to remove his clothing in order to treat him, and the severity of the car accident made me suspect that his injuries were possibly life threatening.
I finally told Mr. CaDad that we were going to remove his clothing and that was that, and if he didn't allow it, he could very well die. As I tried to cut away his shirt, he grabbed my wrist with his bloody hand, and stared right into my eyes. He said that he would rather die than have a female see him naked. His last words as he passed away were a mumbled "modesty and privacy must be protected at all times...".
While we waited for the coroner to arrive, I felt that we should cover the body. As there were no sheets available, I covered him with a plastic shower curtain from the ER bathroom. It seemed appropriate somehow."
Dr. Angela S.
Head ER Surgeon
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento,California

More CFNM propaganda by Bob the closetcase gay, canadian, alcoholic, schizophrenic imbecile.

tnmtndude wrote:

<quoted text>
More CFNM propaganda by Bob the closetcase gay, canadian, alcoholic, schizophrenic imbecile.

Another ignorant response from cfnmturd.

"Another ignorant response from cfnmturd"

No, another spot on assessment from tnmtndude.
I don't always agree with him but if anybody believes this bullshit they have got a serious issue.

Phil wrote:

"Another ignorant response from cfnmturd"
No, another spot on assessment from tnmtndude.
I don't always agree with him but if anybody believes this bullshit they have got a serious issue.

What's up Phil? Still getting naked massages from clothed women?

tnmtndude wrote:

<quoted text>
What's up Phil? Still getting naked massages from clothed women?

You sound as if you are petrified of women, whether you keep your clothes on in their company or not. You are definitely gay but that does not mean you dislike women and many gay men enjoy the company of women and would not care about being undressed near them I think. I suspect if a woman come up to you in a bar or club you would run a mile and if she cornered you into a conversation you would be all tongue tied and far from the mouthy alpha male you pretend you are on here hidden behind the safety of your keyboard up in your bedroom all by yourself.
I only wonder what women have done to you in the past to make you a frijid male.
Act like a man, not a mouse for once!

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
You sound as if you are petrified of women, whether you keep your clothes on in their company or not. You are definitely gay but that does not mean you dislike women and many gay men enjoy the company of women and would not care about being undressed near them I think. I suspect if a woman come up to you in a bar or club you would run a mile and if she cornered you into a conversation you would be all tongue tied and far from the mouthy alpha male you pretend you are on here hidden behind the safety of your keyboard up in your bedroom all by yourself.
I only wonder what women have done to you in the past to make you a frijid male.
Act like a man, not a mouse for once!

I only wonder what makes a MALE pretend to be female (multiple female) aliases on internet forums.
Again I repeat, a year ago a topix moderator said on this forum that he traced the location of your posts and a SINGLE MALE lived at that address. You are a fraud and a liar.
The irony of a female-impersonator telling me to act like a man! Go to hell you rotted ass.

tnmtndude wrote:

<quoted text>
I only wonder what makes a MALE pretend to be female (multiple female) aliases on internet forums.
Again I repeat, a year ago a topix moderator said on this forum that he traced the location of your posts and a SINGLE MALE lived at that address. You are a fraud and a liar.
The irony of a female-impersonator telling me to act like a man! Go to hell you rotted ass.

The angrier you get, the more I know I'm right. Just like everyone else does. I've pushed your buttons and got that raw nerve haven't I.
No denials of anything I said to you because I am spot on about you. Bad luck that your own judgement of others is comically poor. Insults are all you have got left in your reportoire, and with every post they are a diminishing return.
Clearly you are that frijid male and a mouse. A frijid mouse at that! Go squeak!!

Katie from Milton Keyes- uhhh how can I word this .... I do not read tnmtndude or the Old Testament... the above posters are Bob, Phil, Coyote and Katie fr MK. I know Bob is is a good 'ol cndn boy, and for sure coyote is the same, assume Phil to be a good 'ol brit boy.... is Katie from MK a female ????

coyote wrote:

Katie from Milton Keyes- uhhh how can I word this .... I do not read tnmtndude or the Old Testament... the above posters are Bob, Phil, Coyote and Katie fr MK. I know Bob is is a good 'ol cndn boy, and for sure coyote is the same, assume Phil to be a good 'ol brit boy.... is Katie from MK a female ????

Hello Coyote, rest assured that I am very much a woman who just happens to work in a predominantly male orientated job which may give rise to the doubt although I cannot see why myself. The troll poster from Manchester who writes as many others like Jason and Debbie and the Scribbler is in my opinion very much a male from the coarse and uncouth immature language they use.
I am a woman, and you know what? Maybe that damned dude the frijid squeaking mouse is too! Just maybe? Mmmm...?

"ssume Phil to be a good 'ol brit boy"

Indeed and not one who hides behind a made up name or uses multiple ID's.

"What's up Phil? Still getting naked massages from clothed women?"

tnmtndude,I was actually defending you if you read my comment.
Yes, I had one last night and it was great.
Very sensual it was too.
Some of us don't have such hangups and are comfortable (almost) in our own skin
We don't feel the need to tell the world what big men we are and that we are in charge (real men don't need to do that)when really we are just very insecure!

Phil wrote:

tnmtndude,I was actually defending you if you read my comment.
Yes, I had one last night and it was great.
Very sensual it was too.
Some of us don't have such hangups and are comfortable (almost) in our own skin
We don't feel the need to tell the world what big men we are and that we are in charge (real men don't need to do that)when really we are just very insecure!

No you weren't "defending" me. Because we agree on nothing, Phil.
As this comment proved, you're in perfect alignment with the coyot/male-katie/Bob pro-CFNM psycho brigade. These are who you consistently defend.

I repeat, real men prefer NUDE WOMEN they have a relationship with. Not CLOTHED FEMALE strangers who control and humiliate them while naked. So you enjoy your fetish and your cohorts here, Phil.

Tks Katie--- in my posts eons ago I often expressed sympathy to the sick one's husband--- have a great day !!

"Because we agree on nothing"

Well we grown ups on here who don't have hangups like you agree on one thing, that you are obviously obsessed with CFNM. It seems to be your stock (ie, unoriginal and unintelligent) answer to all posts.

Phil wrote:

"Because we agree on nothing"
Well we grown ups on here who don't have hangups like you agree on one thing, that you are obviously obsessed with CFNM. It seems to be your stock (ie, unoriginal and unintelligent) answer to all posts.

As I said, you've chosen your side.
Have fun with your fellow "grown-ups" coyot/male-katie/Bob.

tnmtndude wrote:

<quoted text>

I repeat, real men prefer NUDE WOMEN they have a relationship with. Not CLOTHED FEMALE strangers who control and humiliate them while naked. So you enjoy your fetish and your cohorts here, Phil.

Look this is not meant to be a sexuality discussion in any way. But you have made a comment above that needs an answer. To a certain degree your comment is all well and good but is tragically flawed.

HUMAN SEXUALITY IS NOT A BLACK AND WHITE ISSUE!

Whether a persons own sexuality is straight or gay, or bisexual or whatever else, there are so many facets to what people consider a sex life, whether it is in a relationship between two long term lifelong loving people of opposite genders, to one night stands by promiscuous types of any orientation. Some people have the most bizarre sexual fetishes as part of their relationships from wife swapping swinging parties to what is known as dogging in car parks with people looking at them to name two off the top of my head. Some like leather based sex, some like urination based play, and a whole host of other things that I find distasteful but know exist within the human sexuality spectrum. Your Cfnm is yet another part of that spectrum which at the worst extreme crosses a line into illegal underage sickening behaviour by a minority. Real men as you put it, take in all aspects of the sexual spectrum and orientations too.
I also read just a few days ago that 1% of the population are known as asexual, which means they have no sexual urges to do anything at all!
So take your blinkers off and see the world in the varied colours that it is, even if you don't like those colours, instead of such a narrow minded tunnell vision of black and white simplicity.
Lecture over, thankyou.

Katie wrote:

<quoted text>
Look this is not meant to be a sexuality discussion in any way. But you have made a comment above that needs an answer. To a certain degree your comment is all well and good but is tragically flawed.
HUMAN SEXUALITY IS NOT A BLACK AND WHITE ISSUE!
Whether a persons own sexuality is straight or gay, or bisexual or whatever else, there are so many facets to what people consider a sex life, whether it is in a relationship between two long term lifelong loving people of opposite genders, to one night stands by promiscuous types of any orientation. Some people have the most bizarre sexual fetishes as part of their relationships from wife swapping swinging parties to what is known as dogging in car parks with people looking at them to name two off the top of my head. Some like leather based sex, some like urination based play, and a whole host of other things that I find distasteful but know exist within the human sexuality spectrum. Your Cfnm is yet another part of that spectrum which at the worst extreme crosses a line into illegal underage sickening behaviour by a minority. Real men as you put it, take in all aspects of the sexual spectrum and orientations too.
I also read just a few days ago that 1% of the population are known as asexual, which means they have no sexual urges to do anything at all!
So take your blinkers off and see the world in the varied colours that it is, even if you don't like those colours, instead of such a narrow minded tunnell vision of black and white simplicity.
Lecture over, thankyou.

You should know about "real men" since you ARE one. Well, then again actually you're not.
A real man doesn't pretend to be women and defend those who advocate humiliation as a legitimate sexual behavior.
So you're neither a man nor a woman. Must suck to be you, freak.
You've long since worn out your welcome here so please do the world a favor and go f**k yourself now.

tnmtndude wrote:

<quoted text>
You should know about "real men" since you ARE one. Well, then again actually you're not.
A real man doesn't pretend to be women and defend those who advocate humiliation as a legitimate sexual behavior.
So you're neither a man nor a woman. Must suck to be you, freak.
You've long since worn out your welcome here so please do the world a favor and go f**k yourself now.

To be honest darling what you said back to me came as no surprise whatever and you can keep calling black white but it will still be black no matter how many times you repeat it like a worn out mantra. You simply cannot find it within yourself to even begin to debate in any kind of sane communication even when given an opportunity. You cannot even understand when somebody is just stating a fact and instead make it out to be a defence of the issue, which was not my point.
I'm afraid if anyone here is deserving of being named a contemptible fraud then it is yourself and you are not even worthy of a reply from anybody on here again and I would urge everyone to ignore every last pathetic gasp that comes out of you. Waste of space. End of.

tnmtndude wrote:

<quoted text>
I only wonder what makes a MALE pretend to be female (multiple female) aliases on internet forums.
Again I repeat, a year ago a topix moderator said on this forum that he traced the location of your posts and a SINGLE MALE lived at that address. You are a fraud and a liar.
The irony of a female-impersonator telling me to act like a man! Go to hell you rotted ass.

A year ago, a person claiming to be a Brian Styler, claimed to have traced the location of Katie's posts. This proves nothing.
If it's true, I challenge anyone to use nothing more than "Bob Toronto, Canada and Dorval, Quebec" to trace my identity.
Good luck with that.

Although we don't need any high-tech help to prove that cfnmturd is an ignorant insulting troll. He proves that himself every time he posts.

Bob wrote:

I challenge anyone to use nothing more than "Bob Toronto, Canada and Dorval, Quebec" to trace my identity.
Good luck with that.

Ever heard of tracing an ISP, you ignorant tool? It's easily done and I believe Brian Styler WAS who he said he was.
"Katie" is a fraud and a MALE.
He also said the alleged "two Katies" both originated from the same address.
So put that in your fat, moronic ass and spin on it.