Avandia cases havena t settled

Judged:

1

WBBJ wrote:

<quoted text>
Just when you think you're out, they pull you back in! Are you saying that the sum awarded to your group was split among your group?...WBBJ!!!

gary wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, but it was not determined how much each received until after many had been disqualified. The total number went from 2025 to 1400 or so, then the point totals were figured. I have told this before.

Judged:

1

1

WBBJ wrote:

<quoted text>How did it, if in any way did it affect point values?...WBBJ!!!

Mike wrote:

<quoted text>
As the number of people decrease, the point values increase. Points could start out at 900.00 each, but after people in the group do not qualify the point amount could go up to 1100.00. That would be beneficial if you are in a large group, but if you are in a small group it wouldn't change your point values much

Judged:

1

WBBJ wrote:

<quoted text>Some here believe the money goes back to GSK, Mike. What makes you know otherwise?...WBBJ!!!

WBBJ wrote:

<quoted text>
This differs from your first answer, right?...WBBJ!

oleanslady wrote:

i was told law firms settled based per-injured person. based on total (claims or bad),again they still get there fee.and same expence.27% which is suppose to devide among all in group.its not...

LisaTX wrote:

yes because i was referring to claims that have been approved to receive an award.
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

LisaTX wrote:

yes because i was referring to claims that have been approved to receive an award.
<quoted text>

WBBJ wrote:

<quoted text>
I know I've been all over the place on this one LisaTX (what happens to group settlement money if some are not ever qualified). I got to thinking, one of the things I was told by my attorney, was the point amount in my case. She could not tell me what what the settlement offer was for me or anybody else in my group because they were waiting on others who had initially been rejected by GSK, to be qualified. I did not ask if those who had been rejected, were rejected summarily, or that the reported injury was rejected (then the attorney resubmits the case using another injury - for example instead of a heart attack which may not have been listed, and worth more points, resubmit it using a stroke, or chf, etc). My point is that she could not tell me point values or settlement amounts until knowing the final number of qualified claimants. This tends to support the premise that point values are in flux and determined by the final number of qualified claimants within a group. Please everyone, tell me what you think?...WBBJ!!!

Judged:

1

1

1

WBBJ wrote:

<quoted text>
I know I've been all over the place on this one LisaTX (what happens to group settlement money if some are not ever qualified). I got to thinking, one of the things I was told by my attorney, was the point amount in my case. She could not tell me what what the settlement offer was for me or anybody else in my group because they were waiting on others who had initially been rejected by GSK, to be qualified. I did not ask if those who had been rejected, were rejected summarily, or that the reported injury was rejected (then the attorney resubmits the case using another injury - for example instead of a heart attack which may not have been listed, and worth more points, resubmit it using a stroke, or chf, etc). My point is that she could not tell me point values or settlement amounts until knowing the final number of qualified claimants. This tends to support the premise that point values are in flux and determined by the final number of qualified claimants within a group. Please everyone, tell me what you think?...WBBJ!!!