SINGER: No proof man causes global warming

Dec 28, 2010 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Washington Times

ASSOCIATED PRESS Delegates follow the opening of the Climate Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, Monday, Dec.

Comments
541 - 556 of 556 Comments Last updated Feb 6, 2011
First Prev
of 28
Next Last

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#582
Feb 3, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

He's so right. We are walking, talking carbon. This is life. Sun shines and we rejoice. Rain falls and brings life. Climate always changes. Its all about how you look at it.

Average global climate is fantasy.
Unprecedented global warming is trendspotting.
AGW tipping point catastrophe is ludicrous monster science, the poison drool from the ravaging giant lizard.

We are CO2 moving through orbit.
I AM DIGITAP

Yuba City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#583
Feb 4, 2011
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Marco the atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, and what a lesson it is.
STOP RUNNING and PRETENDING YOU HAVEN'T HAD YOUR BULLSHIT CALLED.

EXPLAIN how YOU DIDN'T KNOW the 'CLIMATE MATH' and 'CLIMATE STATISTICS' that the
"CHARLATAN of STATISTICS" Mann,
and JONES - BRIFFA

****INVENTED****

WAS RULED by the HEAD of the ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY to NOT BE

STATISTICS nor indeed MATHEMATICS of ANY KIND.

WHY COULDN'T YOU TELL DIPSHIT?

WHY are you IN HERE TOUTING PAPERS whose VALUE has been reduced to TOILET PAPER by ONE STROKE of the HEAD of the ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY'S PEN?

WHY are you IN HERE CLAIMING you UNDERSTAND the SCIENCE when YOU WERE SO SURPRISED to SEE PHIL JONES STATING

MULTIPLE TIMES

that HE and HIS FRIENDS ALL KNOW IT HASN'T WARMED SINCE THE MID 1990S?

Why DIDN'T you KNOW it HASN'T been WARMING????

Why DIDN'T you KNOW the REFERENCE JONES MADE in 2005 when he ASCRIBED the WORLD'S TEMP as "NO WARMING just a DASH of COOLING" ??

WHY DIDN'T YOU KNOW he was REFERRING to the MEASUREMENT USED by MAINSTREAM SCIENCE, the RAW DATA POSTED ONLINE to PREVENT

dipshits like YOU

from BEING LED ALONG BY THE NOSE in a SCAM????

WHY didn't you KNOW that STEVEN SCHNEIDER'S "The answer's blowing in the wind' PAPER

was a RIDICULOUS piece of WASTE wherein he CLAIMED to have WRITTEN a PROGRAM DERIVING TEMPERATURE from

WIND SPEED -

why didn't YOU RECOGNIZE THAT as IMPOSSIBLE?????

WHY DIDN'T you RECOGNIZE it was IMPOSSIBLE for ACCURACY when the

C.L.I.M.A.T.O.L.O.G.I.S.T. WRITING the HarryReadMe.txt FILE

said THE ENTIRE C.R.U. DATABASE was SO CORRUPT that EVEN the PEOPLE WORKING THERE had NO IDEA if INFORMATION was EVEN a RECORD of a REAL STATION

or JUST SOMETHING SOMEONE MADE UP?

WHY DIDN'T you GRASP the SERIOUSNESS of THAT REVELATION??

Because YOU'RE a DIPSHIT who THOUGHT IT had been getting HOTTER for THE PAST DECADE and a HALF!

Because YOU'RE a DIPSHIT who THOUGHT MANN/JONES/BRIFFA "MATH"

was

R E A L MATH

Because YOU'RE a DIPSHIT who DIDN'T REALIZE the SIGNIFICANCE of SEEING JONES say AND THE REST NOT DISAGREE

that IT HASN'T WARMED for YEARS.

You're a NOBODY till you EXPLAIN WHY YOU DID NOT GRASP the SIGNIFICANCE of ALL THE ABOVE

you PINHEAD nobody.
THIS

is how LIBERALS

wind up DEAD by the THOUSANDS from VENEREAL DISEASE.

TOO STUPID to EVEN BE TOLD what's wrong - even to be SHOWN.

No wonder you HICKS are CONSTANTLY being

DARWINIZED.
I AM DIGITAP

Yuba City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#584
Feb 4, 2011
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Why are you in here CLAIMING you HAVE SOMEONE'S INFORMATION to TOUT

that HASN'T BEEN RULED to HAVE COME from a MATHEMATICAL INCOMPETENT

or FAILED DATA ANALYST like TRENBERTH who thought TWELVE YEARS of GRADUALLY TAPERING ACTIVITY and a little COOLING

was EVER ACCELERATING APOCALYPTIC HELLFIRE in the SKY

you ILLITERATE and INNUMERATE grub eating TWIT?

Why don't you have any ANSWER for why STEVEN SCHNEIDER - a TOP 'CLIMATE SPECIALIST' who WORKED for NASA at one time -

EXPLAIN how that HICK THOUGHT he had OVERTHROWN the LAWS of INSTRUMENTATION

writing a PAPER deriving TEMPERATURE from WIND SPEED --

*** TELL US HOW YOU THINK THAT WORKS, B!+CH!***

GO FIND SOMEONE who will TELL YOU HOW THEY THINK that WORKS,

HICK!

We'll WAIT HERE. We BROUGHT TOWELS in case we SNORT our COFFEE ONTO our KEYBOARDS when your LAME,
STUPID, ILLITERATE, INNUMERATE A$$ GROWS the B@lls

and has them DROP

giving you COURAGE to answer HOW YOU THOUGHT THAT was POSSIBLE.

WHY DON'T you START EXPLAINING to ME motherf&&ER,

f&&ck the REST of these PEOPLE you explain to

ME B!+CH

How YOU THINK BACKRADIATION - a SIMPLE, SIMPLE,***GAS PHYISICS the SIMPLEST of MATTER STATES***

QUESTION:

exPLAIN to THIS INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCE how YOU THINK

B.A.C.K.R.A.D.I.A.T.I.O.N. works: and HOW it REVERSED the POLARITY of ***EITHER*** the

Gravitational OR Electromagnetic
FORCE -

EXPLAIN YOUR CHURCH'S TAKE on HOW HEAT ACTS when PHOTONIC ENERGY IS ON a GAS ATOM.

We're all going to be STUNNED at the SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENTS such as

MATH that's NOT MATH being MORE ACCURATE than MATH ITSELF

a PROGRAM that TELLS TEMP from WIND SPEED and PROVES ALL the WORLD'S THERMOMETERS to BE BROKEN and not ONE
SENSING and DETECTION ORGANIZATION on EARTH KNOW IT

Tell us about it you f&ng PAINT-CHIP fed GHETTO TRASH:

WE're WAITING with ABATED BREATH for your STUNNING REVELATIONS on how the FIELDS

of INSTRUMENTATION,
STATISTICS,
and G.R.A.V.I.T.Y. have ALL THREE

BEEN

SIMULTANEOUSLY

OVERTHROWN

by a bunch of FAT STUPID CRACKERS who GOT CAUGHT PLOTTING to RUIN a REPORTER'S CAREER for SAYING what THEY were PISSING and MOANING about REGRETTING,

was TRUE.

go GET GAVIN SCHMIDT or that HICK from SCEPTICAL SCIENCE or that EMBECILE TAMINO who CAN'T TELL IT WASN'T REAL MATH EITHER

beTWEEN THEM.

We're waiting with out towels ready b!+ch so the FEWEST KEYBOARDS are VICTIM to OUTBURSTS of HILARIOUS GALES of MOCKERY and SCOFFING at your

LACK of even SIMPLEST GRASP of A PROPORTIONAL-PHYSICS LAW-DRIVEN

Universe.

Go get someone who'll EXPLAIN why YOUR PEOPLE CAN'T TELL IT'S NOT MATH,

HICK.

Now.
Chuck

Bellevue, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#585
Feb 4, 2011
 

Judged:

2

2

2

I AM DIGITAP wrote:
Why are you in here CLAIMING you HAVE SOMEONE'S INFORMATION to TOUT
that HASN'T BEEN RULED to HAVE COME from a MATHEMATICAL INCOMPETENT
or FAILED DATA ANALYST like TRENBERTH who thought TWELVE YEARS of GRADUALLY TAPERING ACTIVITY and a little COOLING
was EVER ACCELERATING APOCALYPTIC HELLFIRE in the SKY
you ILLITERATE and INNUMERATE grub eating TWIT?
Why don't you have any ANSWER for why STEVEN SCHNEIDER - a TOP 'CLIMATE SPECIALIST' who WORKED for NASA at one time -
EXPLAIN how that HICK THOUGHT he had OVERTHROWN the LAWS of INSTRUMENTATION
writing a PAPER deriving TEMPERATURE from WIND SPEED --
*** TELL US HOW YOU THINK THAT WORKS, B!+CH!***
GO FIND SOMEONE who will TELL YOU HOW THEY THINK that WORKS,
HICK!
We'll WAIT HERE. We BROUGHT TOWELS in case we SNORT our COFFEE ONTO our KEYBOARDS when your LAME,
STUPID, ILLITERATE, INNUMERATE A$$ GROWS the B@lls
and has them DROP
giving you COURAGE to answer HOW YOU THOUGHT THAT was POSSIBLE.
WHY DON'T you START EXPLAINING to ME motherf&&ER,
f&&ck the REST of these PEOPLE you explain to
ME B!+CH
How YOU THINK BACKRADIATION - a SIMPLE, SIMPLE,***GAS PHYISICS the SIMPLEST of MATTER STATES***
QUESTION:
exPLAIN to THIS INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCE how YOU THINK
B.A.C.K.R.A.D.I.A.T.I.O.N. works: and HOW it REVERSED the POLARITY of ***EITHER*** the
Gravitational OR Electromagnetic
FORCE -
EXPLAIN YOUR CHURCH'S TAKE on HOW HEAT ACTS when PHOTONIC ENERGY IS ON a GAS ATOM.
We're all going to be STUNNED at the SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENTS such as
MATH that's NOT MATH being MORE ACCURATE than MATH ITSELF
a PROGRAM that TELLS TEMP from WIND SPEED and PROVES ALL the WORLD'S THERMOMETERS to BE BROKEN and not ONE
SENSING and DETECTION ORGANIZATION on EARTH KNOW IT
Tell us about it you f&ng PAINT-CHIP fed GHETTO TRASH:
WE're WAITING with ABATED BREATH for your STUNNING REVELATIONS on how the FIELDS
of INSTRUMENTATION,
STATISTICS,
and G.R.A.V.I.T.Y. have ALL THREE
BEEN
SIMULTANEOUSLY
OVERTHROWN
by a bunch of FAT STUPID CRACKERS who GOT CAUGHT PLOTTING to RUIN a REPORTER'S CAREER for SAYING what THEY were PISSING and MOANING about REGRETTING,
was TRUE.
go GET GAVIN SCHMIDT or that HICK from SCEPTICAL SCIENCE or that EMBECILE TAMINO who CAN'T TELL IT WASN'T REAL MATH EITHER
beTWEEN THEM.
We're waiting with out towels ready b!+ch so the FEWEST KEYBOARDS are VICTIM to OUTBURSTS of HILARIOUS GALES of MOCKERY and SCOFFING at your
LACK of even SIMPLEST GRASP of A PROPORTIONAL-PHYSICS LAW-DRIVEN
Universe.
Go get someone who'll EXPLAIN why YOUR PEOPLE CAN'T TELL IT'S NOT MATH,
HICK.
Now.
Al Gore as a child below:

http://www.conspiracycards.com/Toys/BohemianG...

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#586
Feb 5, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Anyone see are hear about this article from 1922, any comments?

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/16/you-ask...

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, SE Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#587
Feb 5, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

J_a_n wrote:
Anyone see are hear about this article from 1922, any comments?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/16/you-ask...
It has been posted here many times, but it's always good to rub in the faces of alarmists.
Here's another:
"It will without doubt have come to your Lordship's knowledge that a considerable change of climate, inexplicable at present to us, must have taken place in the Circumpolar Regions, by which the severity of the cold that has for centuries past enclosed the seas in the high northern latitudes in an impenetrable barrier of ice has been during the last two years, greatly abated.

(This) affords ample proof that new sources of warmth have been opened and give us leave to hope that the Arctic Seas may at this time be more accessible than they have been for centuries past, and that discoveries may now be made in them not only interesting to the advancement of science but also to the future intercourse of mankind and the commerce of distant nations."
President of the Royal Society, London, to the Admiralty, 20th November, 1817
http://www.john-daly.com/polar/arctic.htm
kal

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#588
Feb 5, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Earthling-1 wrote:
<quoted text>It has been posted here many times, but it's always good to rub in the faces of alarmists.
Here's another:
"It will without doubt have come to your Lordship's knowledge that a considerable change of climate, inexplicable at present to us, must have taken place in the Circumpolar Regions, by which the severity of the cold that has for centuries past enclosed the seas in the high northern latitudes in an impenetrable barrier of ice has been during the last two years, greatly abated.
(This) affords ample proof that new sources of warmth have been opened and give us leave to hope that the Arctic Seas may at this time be more accessible than they have been for centuries past, and that discoveries may now be made in them not only interesting to the advancement of science but also to the future intercourse of mankind and the commerce of distant nations."
President of the Royal Society, London, to the Admiralty, 20th November, 1817
http://www.john-daly.com/polar/arctic.htm
although I've read this before the; " also to the future intercourse" , part worries me, as I know lite song will show up

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, SE Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#589
Feb 5, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

kal wrote:
although I've read this before the; " also to the future intercourse" , part worries me, as I know lite song will show up
Isn't that what they say about bad pennies?
Never mind, we have to take the rough wih the smooth, it's all part of life's rich tapestry.

“Facts, not fiction”

Since: Apr 07

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#590
Feb 6, 2011
 

Judged:

1

Earthling-1 wrote:
<quoted text>That's nothing, one of your science minded friends actually wrote this:<quoted text>
What makes him my friend?

“Facts, not fiction”

Since: Apr 07

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#591
Feb 6, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
You really need to learn how to do your own research. Because considering how much they now make I not going to do it for free.
I am an active researcher...you clearly are not.
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
But with just a few minutes on Google I found plenty on how the NAS membership has had issues with the NAS. Just as I had little trouble finding out about how many lobbist the NAS has and how much money the NAS has received which is a mind boggling amount.
I am sure you can point me to that evidence.
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
The reason why John Cook has to supplement his income by doing web sites and database programming is because he cannot seem to find a job in physics which is what his degree is in.
Please provide evidence that John Cook could not find a job in physics. Really, Tina, have you still not seen that I'm someone who goes after factual argumentation?
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Also the wikipedia administrator was not doing his job unless his job was to write fiction. He was editing out anything that did not agree with man made global warming and even entering false data to support it. Add on top of that the there are professors who will not accept papers that use wikipeida as a source and you have a history of bad data.
Again no factual argumentation, but rather claims. No one caught Connolley entering false data, they 'caught' him reverting edits that were poorly backed up, or downright wrong. That, of course, was not to the liking of the anti-science crowd. I also don't understand your continuous bashing of Wikipedia. The science isn't on Wikipedia, it is in the scientific literature. And it's literature I doubt you ever read.
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
And I think Inbtelligent Design is just as creditable as AGW/Man made global warming. And of course I do not use the lefy wing right wing bit unless the other person brings it up then only because it make the handy club to beat them with.
I never brought up "left-right"...

But it's interesting you believe just about every scientific organisation when it discredits Intelligent Design (despite a minority of scientists defending it), and then claim a political conspiracy of those same scientific organisations when they state science shows there is AGW. Consistency is apparently not your strength either.

“Facts, not fiction”

Since: Apr 07

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#592
Feb 6, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
And your relying on te IPCC report as a truthful source. That report has found to have so many false hoods that it now qualifies as fiction. You should try some other source that hasn't had the skeptics going over it with an extremely fine tooth comb.
Because as a source of facts the IPCC report is anything but a reliable source. They have a worse reputation than wikipedia and the CRU and that took a little doing. Go back to skepticalscience.com . At least those have a little more creditablility.
You guys are going around in circles. First claim "the IPCC does not do X or show Y", get shown wrong ("here it is, chapter x.x"), then claim the IPCC report is not a truthful source, and repeat the first claim again in the next comment. Repeat ad infinitum, and Tina Anne thinks she actually makes a coherent argument.

“Facts, not fiction”

Since: Apr 07

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#593
Feb 6, 2011
 

Judged:

2

1

1

J_a_n wrote:
Someone once here referenced a volcanic eruption they used the magnitude of Mount Saint Helen's or the more recent Eyjafjallajökull. I don't remeber the exact numbers, but displayed how they contributed more to global/climate alterations in 30 days than mankind has say could contribute in the last 100-500 years.
Show us just how irrelevant we really are, if we want to make changes we need to learn how to control volcanoes, earthquakes and other phenomenons of mother nature.
<quoted text>
Jan:
http://gizmodo.com/5519809/eyjafjallajokull-d...

Pinatubo, a class higher eruption than that of Mt St. Helens (it's a logarithmic scale), cause about 1-2 years of slightly cooler temperatures. Long term effect? Nil.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain hideaway, SE Spain

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#594
Feb 6, 2011
 

Judged:

1

Marco the atheist wrote:
What makes him my friend?
Like any human being who considers themself to be a person of reason, you should consider him a friend because you can have no enemies who live in countries classed as allies.
The only antonyms for friend, are foe, enemy, detractor or opponent and in this instance, he's none of those.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#595
Feb 6, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Marco the atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
I am an active researcher...you clearly are not.
<quoted text>
I am sure you can point me to that evidence.
<quoted text>
Please provide evidence that John Cook could not find a job in physics. Really, Tina, have you still not seen that I'm someone who goes after factual argumentation?
<quoted text>
Again no factual argumentation, but rather claims. No one caught Connolley entering false data, they 'caught' him reverting edits that were poorly backed up, or downright wrong. That, of course, was not to the liking of the anti-science crowd. I also don't understand your continuous bashing of Wikipedia. The science isn't on Wikipedia, it is in the scientific literature. And it's literature I doubt you ever read.
<quoted text>
I never brought up "left-right"...
But it's interesting you believe just about every scientific organisation when it discredits Intelligent Design (despite a minority of scientists defending it), and then claim a political conspiracy of those same scientific organisations when they state science shows there is AGW. Consistency is apparently not your strength either.
You cannot be that active a researcher if your spending all this time on Topix and have not bothered to do the amount of research a fifth grader has done for a science project. Try going to google and giving it a chance to find the very same information for you. After all I sure you have tapped a search engine or two in your quest for information.

It is also funny how you describe that only a minority of scientist still support Intelligent Design when the exact same thing could be said for man made global warming. As for political debate I debate politics when it involves political organizations and none is more political than a lobbing group. The NAS is such a lobbing group with plenty of lobbiest working for them.

“dening those who deny nature. ”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#596
Feb 6, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Marco the atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
You guys are going around in circles. First claim "the IPCC does not do X or show Y", get shown wrong ("here it is, chapter x.x"), then claim the IPCC report is not a truthful source, and repeat the first claim again in the next comment. Repeat ad infinitum, and Tina Anne thinks she actually makes a coherent argument.
And yet, you have not proved that it is a truthful source other than to claim it is so because the UN IPCC had said so. talk about the pot calling the kettle black. There have been plenty of examples of the IPCC having gross errors and suffering from biased reporting. So much so that they had to reorganize.

You claim to be an active researcher sodo the research yourself and provide some proof that they can be considered a reliable source. So far you appear to be more of an activist researcher. Becasue claiming the the IPCC is a relaible source by quoting IPCC sources is going to have you going in circles.
I AM DIGITAP

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#597
Feb 6, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Marco the atheist wrote:
<quoted text>
I am an active researcher...
You're an ACTIVE LIAR because if you could READ or understand anything mathematical, YOU'D have UNDERSTOOD the DEATH KNELL to your CHURCH when CLIMATE MATH was ruled NOT MATH at ALL.

You never measured anything for money you didn't get fired for; and the only 'research' you do is for Jr. College classes in lower level politics & other soft science.

SO FAR your STUPID ASS has come here CONVINCED it's the END of the WORLD

in spite of the fact YOUR GURUS were TEACHING EACH other BULLSHIT that TURNS OUT to NOT BE MATH AT ALL: just WORTHLESS DOODLES by

A.M.A.T.E.U.R.S.

Which means ALL their papers are now TOILET PAPER.

You can't research: you're too STUPID to REALIZE the GRAVITY of JONES ADMITTING that IT HASN'T WARMED since 1995, and has actually COOLED since 2002 - that admission in the Feb 2010 B.B.C. INTERVIEW.

You're an IGNORANT, INNUMERATE HICK who has no more grasp of MATHEMATICS than PHYSICS because you ALSO bought the mythical

BACKRADIATION where GRAVITY'S POLARITY got REVERSED and HEAT no longer RISES - it SINKS in the atmosphere, screwing INTO the SOURCE of the GRAVITATIONAL FIELD the RADIATION'S in.

YOU'RE a F^NG JANITOR.

PERIOD.
If you WEREN'T you'd HAVE UNDERSTOOD "it WAS NOT EVER REAL MATH"

A.N.D.

your GURUS COULDN'T TELL: they HAD to be TOLD by the HEAD of the ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY.

You've got the ACUMEN of some ILLITERATE HIGH-SCHOOLER who took a DEBATE class.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 28
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Copenhagen, Denmark Discussions

Search the Copenhagen, Denmark Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
massage copenhagen (May '13) Jul 26 safe discrete massage 6
Over 2.3mil illegal immigrants register within ... (Dec '11) Jun '14 Christian 5
What wealth gap? Not in this country Jun '14 J_a_n 2
Children with autism have elevated levels of st... Jun '14 ricDUH99 34
Conchita Wurst from Austria wins Eurovision 2014 Jun '14 J_a_n 5
NATO chief, former US intelligence director amo... May '14 eurotrashlives 1
State Of The City reports: Bernhard: ex-SS Bild... May '14 Mark 1
•••
•••