No he didn't.<quoted text>
. H.L. Mencken once said, "No one ever went broke by underestimating the intelligence of the American people."
He DID say "No one ever went broke underestimating the TASTE of the American PUBLIC". And he also said "There's no underestimating the intelligence of the American public". But he never said "No one ever went broke BY[sic] underestimating the INTELLIGENCE[sic] of the American PEOPLE[sic]".
You're awfully ignorant for someone so arrogant.
.
Proud of whom? I'VE never had anything to do with any smear campaigns--not against (John?)Kerry and not against anyone else. I don't know anyone involved in a smear campaign against Kerry. And the feeling I experience most often when witnessing a "smear campaign" is disgust. So no, the fact that an alleged "smear campaign against Kerry worked very well" doesn't in any way make me proud.<quoted text>The smear campaign against Kerry worked very well. That must make you proud.
"His dangerous cluelessness..."--WTF?<quoted text>. George W. Bush was a failure in many areas, including the presidency. His dangerous cluelessness about important decisions, his virtual inability to complete a sentence, his wearing a transmitter in back of his jacket providing him with answers in presidential debates, all attest to my conclusion that the man is a crude, vulgar, dull-witted buffoon - or as I put it earlier, an IDIOT.
I've got to be honest man: If this kind of crap is your idea of profound critical insight, you might want to stop throwing the word "idiot" around so freely--people might get the wrong idea.
You accuse the man of exhibiting a "dangerous cluelessness about important decisions". That don't make no SENSE man! If you're gonna' call people "idiot", you're gonna' have to get a handle on grammar, proper sentence structure and other important stuff that.