tna vs wwe

So did people like the PPV?

Nathan wrote:

I also like both TNA and WWE for the good parts which is about half of each show. My point is that both organizations could be much more creative and easily make wrestling much much better.
They don't because they seem to think little kids pay for wrestling and also because at least one organization is run by a former "special ed" kid who FAKED his education.
Meanwhile both organizations copy silly nonsense from each other because it makes money - not because its good!

wait so a business is doing what makes them money? who wouldve thought. just an FYI kids my not pay but they are the ones that most of the t-shirts, action figures, masks and accesories get bought for.

Alexandor Grym Ryanston wrote:

<quoted text>For once I agree with you my friend, they could have more creativity and bring out something that's never been done before and have the wrestling much more excitement. But who knows what the stage they're both planning on next, will never know just of yet.

the both of you call out creative all the time so lets see what new and exciting gimmicks or storylines you have? please write them up and show creative how its done.

Any ideas my friends?

There plans are to keep using the "try anything new" method because every single time they change titles, story lines and matches it creates interest. Many people always go to see something DIFFERENT even if it's terrible.

The problem is that they don't think it through and the result is stupid nonsense with tons of illogical inconsistencies. For example I can't believe how many special ed kids thought that Mr McMoron was blown up.

Their latest failure is to make Cena appear to be a weakling and then try to fix it. Unfortunately everyone I've talked to now has zero interest in seeing Rock VS Cena. The only thing they successfully did was blow up PPV Wrestle Crap sales!

I would only have an interest if it were free. Maybe they can double their earnings by making Natalia fart at everyone and create multiple feuds. We can't wait till they start shitting on each other as well (like they've already shit on the fans even if they don't realize it}. Maybe Mr McMoron can be the anonymous general manager again and fool all of you once again. Bet you can't wait.

Here's a link that sort of tells the truth in a comical way:

http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Professional_...

Nathan wrote:

There plans are to keep using the "try anything new" method because every single time they change titles, story lines and matches it creates interest. Many people always go to see something DIFFERENT even if it's terrible.
The problem is that they don't think it through and the result is stupid nonsense with tons of illogical inconsistencies. For example I can't believe how many special ed kids thought that Mr McMoron was blown up.
Their latest failure is to make Cena appear to be a weakling and then try to fix it. Unfortunately everyone I've talked to now has zero interest in seeing Rock VS Cena. The only thing they successfully did was blow up PPV Wrestle Crap sales!
I would only have an interest if it were free. Maybe they can double their earnings by making Natalia fart at everyone and create multiple feuds. We can't wait till they start shitting on each other as well (like they've already shit on the fans even if they don't realize it}. Maybe Mr McMoron can be the anonymous general manager again and fool all of you once again. Bet you can't wait.

and yet you fail to offer any of your own million dollar ideas. its fairly simple, you dont like it, dont watch it.

That's their job - not mine or yours. My point, which you again missed, is that wrestling is nowhere near as good as it was in the 80s and early 90s.

You've got to learn to be a more critical reader or you'll continue to make statements which make you appear foolish.

Nathan wrote:

That's their job - not mine or yours. My point, which you again missed, is that wrestling is nowhere near as good as it was in the 80s and early 90s.
You've got to learn to be a more critical reader or you'll continue to make statements which make you appear foolish.

i disagree. in this era of "reality wrestling" great things have happened. Punk, Ziggler, Bryan etc are getting a spotlight when years ago it never wouldve happened. i dont need shitty gimmicks to keep my interest. no garbage men, no voodoo priests, no plumbers etc are needed. you are stuck in an era that has passed on. hell even HHH acknowledged it on monday. him, HBK and Taker are a dying breed. its all been done before and its hard to keep things fresh. people will always bitch about something. if its not "oh they arent pushing young stars" its "the storylines are weak" or "there isnt enough build up" etc.

Everyone has there own opinion. Different strokes for different folks as the old saying goes. The bottom line, however, is that wrestling today is definitely filled with tons of flaws. It's geared towards kids and adults with limited thinking skills.

You can't create and rehearse great wrestling in 1 or 2 days. That's what's happening today because they try to sell 2 or 3 wrestling shows per week plus monthly pay per views which is overkill.

Years ago you had ONE 2 hour wrestling show per week and one great pay per view about once every 4-6 months. Back then wrestling was incredibly good from beginning to end.

You're probably too young to know this. This is the real reason why you hear older people complain about the obviously fake "reality" era. Wrestling still has its positive moments but it can't be compared to the great wrestling that used to be fantastically entertaining.

Nathan wrote:

Everyone has there own opinion. Different strokes for different folks as the old saying goes. The bottom line, however, is that wrestling today is definitely filled with tons of flaws. It's geared towards kids and adults with limited thinking skills.
You can't create and rehearse great wrestling in 1 or 2 days. That's what's happening today because they try to sell 2 or 3 wrestling shows per week plus monthly pay per views which is overkill.
Years ago you had ONE 2 hour wrestling show per week and one great pay per view about once every 4-6 months. Back then wrestling was incredibly good from beginning to end.
You're probably too young to know this. This is the real reason why you hear older people complain about the obviously fake "reality" era. Wrestling still has its positive moments but it can't be compared to the great wrestling that used to be fantastically entertaining.

too young? you mean too young to know of guys like Gorgeous George, Jay Strongbow, Wahoo McDaniel, Verne Gagne, Mike Goch, Stan Hansen etc? ive been watching as long as i can remember and wrestling has come a long way. you didnt have multiple shows back than because they didnt have as big an audience nor was it as far reaching. times change and you gotta change with the times. keep in mind they dont have matches anymore that last two hours and are nothing but hip tosses and leg locks.

Two hours is an exaggeration. There were some occasional rare matches that lasted 45 minutes to an hour though. Our attention span was way better back then. Today with the advanced electronic age everyone wants things over quick and fast. That's why WWE and TNA have some matches only lasting 1 or 2 minutes.

You're right about wrestling coming a long way. It has come a long way down hill. Today we have midgets beating GIANTS, farting women, titles changing every 10-20 days or so, fake (and some real) injuries every other week, announcers and 60 year old men wrestling (including steroid riddled Mr McMoron), beginning wrestlers destroying veterans, 5 wrestlers against 1 (duh I wonder who will win!!??), 2 masked wrestlers who look like twins wrestling and many other idiotic mishaps that didn't occur 15 years ago. There's even a website devoted to this silliness called wrestlecrap.com . Perhaps you can go there and tell them how much you disagree.

You don't have to respond because I just found another great website with great posts. I will be spending my time posting there for awhile. Perhaps in a month or 2 I'll return here to see what's happening. It was a my pleasure to present you with the complete 100% truth about wrestling. Have a great life. Bye for now.

wwe is the best company ever!!

Nathan wrote:

Two hours is an exaggeration. There were some occasional rare matches that lasted 45 minutes to an hour though. Our attention span was way better back then. Today with the advanced electronic age everyone wants things over quick and fast. That's why WWE and TNA have some matches only lasting 1 or 2 minutes.
You're right about wrestling coming a long way. It has come a long way down hill. Today we have midgets beating GIANTS, farting women, titles changing every 10-20 days or so, fake (and some real) injuries every other week, announcers and 60 year old men wrestling (including steroid riddled Mr McMoron), beginning wrestlers destroying veterans, 5 wrestlers against 1 (duh I wonder who will win!!??), 2 masked wrestlers who look like twins wrestling and many other idiotic mishaps that didn't occur 15 years ago. There's even a website devoted to this silliness called wrestlecrap.com . Perhaps you can go there and tell them how much you disagree.
You don't have to respond because I just found another great website with great posts. I will be spending my time posting there for awhile. Perhaps in a month or 2 I'll return here to see what's happening. It was a my pleasure to present you with the complete 100% truth about wrestling. Have a great life. Bye for now.

obviously youve never heard of Ed Lewis and Joe Stecher. believed to be 5 and half hours long. as for idiotic mishaps i would assume you mean botches, but take into account that most wrestlers back in the 50's to the 90's didnt do the things they do today so year botches would happen. it hard to botch when all you do is arm drags, hip tosses and punches. the dual masked wrestlers have actually been around for a long time in Mexico, where it was common because the mask is a sign of lineage, respect and the person who taught you. also take into account the injuries....last i checked guys back in the day didnt work 300+ days a year. they usually worked territories that only ran on the weekends. hmmm i find it funny the 60 year old men you bash are the ones you claim from a better generation....irony? go run along to a place where everyone will just blindly agree with instead of someplace where someone can back up statements with facts and also opinions.

oh and by the way, it the older guys didnt job to the young kids what is the point of even having the young kids work? gotta have superstars for the future dont you?

tna suck donkey balls

TNA in a way is better cause they have the x division which is like the crusierweight divison and they are really good while the crusierweight division in WWE is dead. I mean yeah WWE has a couple of high flyers here and there but TNA has alot of them and TNA has a better womens division cause sometimes they Maine event while WWE only let's them have 3 sometimes 5 minute matches and TNA knows how to use their talent just look at winter while in wwe she only got one title shot while in tna she is a former 2 time champion and mr Anderson while in WWE he only had one title and that was the united states title but in tna he is a former 2 time champion and tna storylines are better

SPOILER ALERT

Just learned from a reliable inside source that WWE is threatening to fire Cena if he doesn't embrace the hate at Wrestlemania. Those who have been wishing for this will finally see it unfold. People will pretend to be injured by Cena and taken out in ambulances. That includes Rock. It won't solve anything but it will make ignorant people come back for more. Can't reveal any more details at this time for personal reasons.

Sounds like a good storyline but they won't fire him he makes to Much money from those spoiled brats o I am sorry I meant the kids

How stupid in my opinion. Rock VS Cena????
Undertaker VS HHH (3rd time at least) with Michaels the referee??? First match: If Cena wins Rock was out of it too long. Rock wins and disappears. Someone interferes. Only possible outcomes. Michaels either costs HHH or the Undertaker the match. Either way it's just plain stupid. Also stupid is that Undertaker was away for a year. Why does HHH always have to get in on the big match - because he's the bosses son in law?? Even if it was $5 I wouldn't waste my money. The one who said wrestling was way better 15 years ago was correct. Today it's just for those who give away free money for gimmicks and nonsense that never ends so you can pay more $$$$$$.