Gay Marriage Fights Continue in New Jersey, California and D.C.

There was less than 40% support for Nat Health Care and the Dumbocrats rammed THAT through.

Never underestimate the power of minority groups to move the liberals to do stupid crap.

to practice equality you will should then consider making sodomy illegal b/c that is why you reject gay marriage isn't it? so, that means lock up the heterosexual perverts who practice sodomy in marriage also.

this must be the bigots-r-us blog, hello all you bigots... what is happening, what your dog run away, so now you got to kick the gays.

Who Bill O'Reilly & Sean Hannity?????????? Or Glenn Beck & Newt "The Fruit" Gingrich??????????

8 ball wrote:

this must be the bigots-r-us blog, hello all you bigots... what is happening, what your dog run away, so now you got to kick the gays.

Howdy! And my dogs say, arf arf!

Easy to scream "bigot" rather than discuss. It's not a simple question. There are multiple opinions, or there would be no need to legislate the terminology.

There are radical idiots on both sides of the issue, and then there are rational people that are deciding the issue by ballot and vote.

There is the "Will of the People".

The rote name-calling simplifies the argument into 2 stupid factions and let's them scream.

debby wrote:

to practice equality you will should then consider making sodomy illegal b/c that is why you reject gay marriage isn't it? so, that means lock up the heterosexual perverts who practice sodomy in marriage also.

its not about an act!

Jerry wrote:

Easy to scream "bigot" rather than discuss. It's not a simple question. There are multiple opinions, or there would be no need to legislate the terminology.
There are radical idiots on both sides of the issue, and then there are rational people that are deciding the issue by ballot and vote.
There is the "Will of the People".
The rote name-calling simplifies the argument into 2 stupid factions and let's them scream.

There is "tyranny of the majority", too. According to our Constitution, the majority DO NOT have the right to dictate to the minority.

Jerry wrote:

Easy to scream "bigot" rather than discuss. It's not a simple question. There are multiple opinions, or there would be no need to legislate the terminology.
There are radical idiots on both sides of the issue, and then there are rational people that are deciding the issue by ballot and vote.
There is the "Will of the People".
The rote name-calling simplifies the argument into 2 stupid factions and let's them scream.

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, it trumps the "Ignorance of the mob".
There is no good argument against gay marriage.

Gay Mom wrote:

<quoted text>
Then lets do away with marriage all together. Get a govenment contract and enter into a civil union that grants 1300+ rights to those signing the contract. Want a marriage? Go see your church.

I'm all for that.

Rose wrote:

<quoted text>
The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, it trumps the "Ignorance of the mob".
There is no good argument against gay marriage.

Intersting that when things don't go your way is Mob Rule, but when they do its a Democracy??

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Intersting that when things don't go your way is Mob Rule, but when they do its a Democracy??

This isn't a democracy. It's a republic.
And is there some law against you con dumbs learning the difference between "its" and "it's"?

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
equal Protection for all?? Does that mean Pedophilia is OK, Beastiality, Incest?? Why not. equal protection right??

I've passed gas smarter than you.
Yes, equal protection for all.
Look it up. I can't be bothered to do it for you.
Cut and paste "14th Amendment" into a search engine.

Rose wrote:

<quoted text>
This isn't a democracy. It's a republic.

I'm impressed, I have never met a liberal who knew the difference.

Rose wrote:

<quoted text>
This isn't a democracy. It's a republic.
And is there some law against you con dumbs learning the difference between "its" and "it's"?

Besides, since you are going to complain over its and it's.. Technically we are a "Representative Republic"

BTW, my comments still stands, it is you libs who fail to know the difference, for like I said:

When Liberals get their way in a ballot proposition it's a Democracy, when vote goes in opposition its mob rule.

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Besides, since you are going to complain over its and it's.. Technically we are a "Representative Republic"
BTW, my comments still stands, it is you libs who fail to know the difference, for like I said:
When Liberals get their way in a ballot proposition it's a Democracy, when vote goes in opposition its mob rule.

You con dumbs have always been against equal rights.

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
equal Protection for all?? Does that mean Pedophilia is OK, Beastiality, Incest?? Why not. equal protection right??

Because the behaviors you mention involve mental dysfunction. Being gay is not a disease.

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
equal Protection for all?? Does that mean Pedophilia is OK, Beastiality, Incest?? Why not. equal protection right??

Children and animals cannot give consent. Incest? Doubt if that taboo is going anywhere. Cousins can marry anyway.
Homophobes always want to bring in unrelated bs to try and inflame everyone.

Rose wrote:

<quoted text>
This isn't a democracy. It's a republic.
And is there some law against you con dumbs learning the difference between "its" and "it's"?

Applauding. You'd think the fools could remember a simple spelling rule and the Pledge of Allegiance.

Rose wrote:

<quoted text>
You con dumbs have always been against equal rights.

YOu complain about "its" and "it's"?? What the hell is this, is this a foreign language or simply poor grammar??