|
ThrobbingWag
Knoxville, TN
|
A bunch of people have quit in my area, and the district manager is scurrying to find replacements for them. My store just lost two managers, and the other MGT's have been pulling in massive overtime in the last week (believe it or not, overtime at Walgreens isn't a fairy tale). My name even came up at a meeting with our district manager and community leader, and our community leader even visited my store just to come talk to me about the new position. I don't consider myself the strongest Walgreens employee, so I think this is indicative of how bad things are going for the company. lol
|
|
Since: Jan 12
United States
|
Please wait...
Judged:
2
1
ThrobbingWag wrote: A bunch of people have quit in my area, and the district manager is scurrying to find replacements for them. My store just lost two managers, and the other MGT's have been pulling in massive overtime in the last week (believe it or not, overtime at Walgreens isn't a fairy tale). My name even came up at a meeting with our district manager and community leader, and our community leader even visited my store just to come talk to me about the new position.
I don't consider myself the strongest Walgreens employee, so I think this is indicative of how bad things are going for the company. lol This is what i expected to happen. This is just starting to happen in my area. Except regular employees seem to be rejecting the new offer, its turning out to be a big headache for everyone.
|
Since: Apr 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
2
Wasn't this piloted in Arizona first? Rewire or Project Edison - whatever they called. Anyone know how they ended up staffing the new SFL, store floor leader, position in those stores? Would be interesting to know what % of people were current employees, MGT or other, and what % they had to hire outside of Walgreens. You would think they have to start filling and training these people now - there won't be time between back-to-school and Christmas to do it.
|
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Phoenix has multiple districts. All MGT's were shifted out of the pilot district while the program was tested.
Basically, the pilot was presented to the remaining employees as a challenge. "Can you make it through the holidays without MGT's?" All of the employees worked very hard because they wanted to prove themselves and show the company assistant managers don't do very much.
I don't think any outside people were hired for the test.
|
|
Geraldo
Houston, TX
|
MGTruth wrote: Phoenix has multiple districts. All MGT's were shifted out of the pilot district while the program was tested. Basically, the pilot was presented to the remaining employees as a challenge. "Can you make it through the holidays without MGT's?" All of the employees worked very hard because they wanted to prove themselves and show the company assistant managers don't do very much. I don't think any outside people were hired for the test. This is what I've been saying for the last several months. Pilot tests need to be done as near to 100% as possible to a "real world" environment. In cases like this it's imperative that DMs and MVPs make sure that tests like this work even if it goes outside the "real world" norm. It's to their advantage career wise. Like I've said also, this test was not done to see if they should do it but how to do it.
|
Since: Apr 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
MGTruth wrote: Phoenix has multiple districts. All MGT's were shifted out of the pilot district while the program was tested. Basically, the pilot was presented to the remaining employees as a challenge. "Can you make it through the holidays without MGT's?" All of the employees worked very hard because they wanted to prove themselves and show the company assistant managers don't do very much. I don't think any outside people were hired for the test. Holy Schnikes. What a story. Do you feel comfortable offering any other details about how long it went on, did they bring in extra staff into the store, anything else you found interesting? I would guess there weren't changes in anybody's pay? Did they take the famous assignment lists and split them up among the departments? I wonder what the employees who worked so hard thought about it all.
|
Since: Apr 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
Geraldo wrote: <quoted text> This is what I've been saying for the last several months. Pilot tests need to be done as near to 100% as possible to a "real world" environment. In cases like this it's imperative that DMs and MVPs make sure that tests like this work even if it goes outside the "real world" norm. It's to their advantage career wise. Like I've said also, this test was not done to see if they should do it but how to do it. Can you handle a stupid question? Are there any districts that have actually changed over to the CL/ASM/STL structure? Wouldn't it make sense to do it one district at a time so you could incorporate lessons learned by any previous transitions? I mean - does anyone else see something wrong with this plan?
|
|
NICE
United States
|
Judged:
1
High turn over and will cause bottom of barrel of employees to fill jobs. I'm a cashier and hoping yo jump ship soon.
|
|
|
|
Geraldo
Dallas, TX
|
WAG watcher wrote: <quoted text> Can you handle a stupid question? Are there any districts that have actually changed over to the CL/ASM/STL structure? Wouldn't it make sense to do it one district at a time so you could incorporate lessons learned by any previous transitions? I mean - does anyone else see something wrong with this plan? I think the closest thing to the full implementation would be in Phoenix but I think all they did was test the SFL concept. From what I've read the SFL concept was only done in slower stores.
|
|
VforVictory
Saint Louis, MO
|
Geraldo wrote: <quoted text> I think the closest thing to the full implementation would be in Phoenix but I think all they did was test the SFL concept. From what I've read the SFL concept was only done in slower stores. These "pilots" are a joke. Like we should base how we employ people at every Wags on a 2-3 month test in 9 stores in one market at Christmas. I'll bet the SM and EXA were working their asses off to not only "impress Wags" but to make their bonuses decent (most likely for the last time). If they dud move all the MGTs out in one fell swoop, where did the SFLs come from? Promoted the STL, that's one, then what? Did others at those stores get promoted or were STLs from non-pilot stores promoted and moved? So if things kinda happened that way, there were no disgruntled ex-MGTs that just lost between $500-$900 per month working there. Only people that were promoted were there so they were happy making more money and worked hard to show that they deserved to be promoted. Real life is VERY different from this FANTASY LAND pilot. MGTs were not there to be pissed off about their future demotion/paycut and only staying til they find a better job. You can tell by reading this blog that some are not putting forth the same effort as before. They've been dissed. That seems like the "Fatal Flaw" of the pilot. Please anyone from those pilot stores, tell us how it went down. I really want to know the real story. Thanks.
|
|
Since: Jan 12
United States
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
VforVictory wrote: <quoted text>These "pilots" are a joke. Like we should base how we employ people at every Wags on a 2-3 month test in 9 stores in one market at Christmas. I'll bet the SM and EXA were working their asses off to not only "impress Wags" but to make their bonuses decent (most likely for the last time). If they dud move all the MGTs out in one fell swoop, where did the SFLs come from? Promoted the STL, that's one, then what? Did others at those stores get promoted or were STLs from non-pilot stores promoted and moved? So if things kinda happened that way, there were no disgruntled ex-MGTs that just lost between $500-$900 per month working there. Only people that were promoted were there so they were happy making more money and worked hard to show that they deserved to be promoted. Real life is VERY different from this FANTASY LAND pilot. MGTs were not there to be pissed off about their future demotion/paycut and only staying til they find a better job. You can tell by reading this blog that some are not putting forth the same effort as before. They've been dissed. That seems like the "Fatal Flaw" of the pilot. Please anyone from those pilot stores, tell us how it went down. I really want to know the real story. Thanks. Agreed! They most certainly did not have MGTs walking out the door all over the place. Even my store, 2 MGTs are on a month long vacation. There are 3 of us left to pick up the slack, an i will find out this coming week if get this new job or not. If i get it, then my SM and EXA will be shocked when i leave.
|
|
nonameplease
United States
|
ThrobbingWag wrote: A bunch of people have quit in my area, and the district manager is scurrying to find replacements for them. My store just lost two managers, and the other MGT's have been pulling in massive overtime in the last week (believe it or not, overtime at Walgreens isn't a fairy tale). My name even came up at a meeting with our district manager and community leader, and our community leader even visited my store just to come talk to me about the new position. I don't consider myself the strongest Walgreens employee, so I think this is indicative of how bad things are going for the company. lol 3 questions for you. Would this be in the Morristown,TN area? Was this 2 EXA's? Did they leave because of the pay cut that will be happening soon?
|
|
ThrobbingWag
Knoxville, TN
|
nonameplease wrote: <quoted text> 3 questions for you. Would this be in the Morristown,TN area? Was this 2 EXA's? Did they leave because of the pay cut that will be happening soon? Nope, Knoxville metro. I'm sure that people are leaving all over the country though.
|
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Geraldo wrote: <quoted text>I think the closest thing to the full implementation would be in Phoenix but I think all they did was test the SFL concept. From what I've read the SFL concept was only done in slower stores. No, actually it was done in both high and low volume stores. The higher volume stores got more SFLs than the lower volume stores got. Some of the stores were some of the busiest in the district. To answer a previous question, no one was hired from outside the company. They asked STLs to switch to SFLs then the store managers nominated certain employees they thought would be good for the position and those employees were asked if they wanted the position or not.
|
Since: Apr 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
PhxEXA wrote: <quoted text> No, actually it was done in both high and low volume stores. The higher volume stores got more SFLs than the lower volume stores got. Some of the stores were some of the busiest in the district. To answer a previous question, no one was hired from outside the company. They asked STLs to switch to SFLs then the store managers nominated certain employees they thought would be good for the position and those employees were asked if they wanted the position or not. Do you have any idea why current store employees would take the SFL position then and why store employees are turning it down now? Did something change about the pay, the role of the SFL,do employees now not see a future with the company or do you see some other factors influencing this change?(I am just trying to figure out what might be different between the previous environment and the current environment for my own curiousity.)
|
|
Since: Mar 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
WAG watcher wrote: <quoted text> Do you have any idea why current store employees would take the SFL position then and why store employees are turning it down now? Did something change about the pay, the role of the SFL,do employees now not see a future with the company or do you see some other factors influencing this change?(I am just trying to figure out what might be different between the previous environment and the current environment for my own curiousity.) Simple as stated in comments above the mgts were moved out of the test area, the STL's were offered the position "probrubly with a buck or two raise" and the rest were asked to prove themselves and their ability to push hard to keep things running without mgts. Noone took paycuts in the test, noone was told they were no longer managers, and noone had to suffer the risk of not being able to pay bills, loosing their houses, cars, ect ect so there is your difference.
|
|
Since: Mar 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
oh yeah and in most markets the base employee actualy sees the crap mgt's are put through and wouldn't take the position for the 11.50 they are being offered because no matter what corp says the SFL had the same job as MGT customer complaints, training and all. Can't wait for the EXA switch to ASM and the howling that will errupt from that :)
|
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
WAG watcher wrote: <quoted text>Do you have any idea why current store employees would take the SFL position then and why store employees are turning it down now? Did something change about the pay, the role of the SFL,do employees now not see a future with the company or do you see some other factors influencing this change?(I am just trying to figure out what might be different between the previous environment and the current environment for my own curiousity.) I'm honestly not sure why the store employees took it. Maybe it was people that were looking to go into management but hadn't been able to since they haven't hired MGTs in the Phoenix market for awhile. The pay is the same. I have heard some complaints about doing an MGT job with less pay though.
|
|
Mickey
United States
|
I find it funny that our new title has changed yet the next generation registers require you to go under management functions for post voids, end of day processing, etc. while we are no longer considered management but rather sfls! Anyone else think that's ironic?
|
|
walgreen's worker
Austin, TX
|
PhxEXA wrote: <quoted text>I'm honestly not sure why the store employees took it. Maybe it was people that were looking to go into management but hadn't been able to since they haven't hired MGTs in the Phoenix market for awhile. The pay is the same. I have heard some complaints about doing an MGT job with less pay though. Wait, what? They didn't give the promoted employees the current SFL rate, but the MGT rate?
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|