Toyota Pays 10 MILLION-First SUA Suit

Judged:

1

JJFADS wrote:

Stop it,
I distinctly remember you saying this would not happen. Care to pass the buck?

Judged:

1

1

1

Thought For The Day wrote:

<quoted text>
Didn't say that JJFADS.
Once again, you choose to interpret things your way.
All I ever said was "wait until the suit is decided" before blowing your horn..
You ignored it then, and you ignore it now.
The only problem is your horn is way off key!
Try again.

Judged:

1

1

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Stop the sarcasm! Engage please-
What part of this suit is not settled? This is an absolute settled suit and it ended in a ten million dollar reward. I understand why Toyota wanted this settlement sealed. Now other attorneys know what Toyota will pay. What really is relevant is that Toyota cannot make this story go away.

Judged:

1

Thought For The Day wrote:

So now JJ claims I'm "sarcastic"?
Response to that as follows:..."It is impossible to see a particular characteristic in someone else unless we ourselves possess that same characteristic".

Judged:

1

1

1

Molly wrote:

<quoted text>I think you are a little sarcastic too. Why do you not like Toyota so much? I think there are many of these cars on the roadways.

Judged:

1

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Stop the sarcasm! Engage please-
What part of this suit is not settled? This is an absolute settled suit and it ended in a ten million dollar reward. I understand why Toyota wanted this settlement sealed. Now other attorneys know what Toyota will pay. What really is relevant is that Toyota cannot make this story go away.

Judged:

1

1

1

Thought For The Day wrote:

<quoted text>
Re my sarcasm--I only give back in kind and don't ever initiate.
Re not liking Toyota--I do not dislike any specific automaker, nor do I prefer one over another.
The only issue I have herein is the constant singling out of only one automaker as a villain.

Judged:

1

Thought For The Day wrote:

<quoted text>
The sarcasm is warranted. Completely!
You youself frequently use sarcasm, so if you can't handle it coming back, you have no reason nor justification to complain when it comes to you.
For the record:.......
I did not, and am not now challenging the fact that there's a settlement---as you're getting all uppity about herein!
I simply corrected your previous claim that I had stated there "will be no settlement" in other discussions.
I did not say that during those nor any other discussions on this issue.
I previously said in rebuttal to your earlier inferences about it being a done deal that "the deal wasn't done yet".
During those previous discussions, the decision had not been made by the trial Judge.
You're accusations are, as usual, wrong, and your remarks are, as usual, unwarranted.

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>I am still waiting for you to tell me what part of this suit is not settled.

just the facts wrote:

<quoted text>You should be more thoughtful and considerate. Toyota made some mistakes but you should not condem them or the remaining family members.

Judged:

1

Thought For The Day wrote:

<quoted text>
I have never said, nor did I dispute that the suit wasn't settled.
Therefor it isn't possible for me to answer your question.
Do you have me confused with someone else?
After all, you do tend to drift off into semantics from time to time!
Busted!!

JJFADS wrote:

<quoted text>Post number four. Stop being so mean. Can you not just participate w/o being this way? Try to be fair please.

JJFADS wrote:

I am fair and open minded. You just don’t like the subject matter.