Obama’s “New” Warfare: Destroying the Catholic Church

Brighteyes9 wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for the backup Sidekick.:) I am fed up with Reader spewing her *hit and backing everyone but Americans. There have been many lives lost and she doesn't seem to get it. I'm just do with her period. Further more, I am not just going to sit a listen to a dear friend get slammed by an idiot that knows nothing. Glitter would give the shirt off her back to a stranger if she knew that person was in need.

I agree. I think we all know they're good people in all cultures. But when she says "i didn't write that though" she still was promoting the issue. Not once acknowledging the American people who went through it in pain and suffering. i remember last years 9/11 threads, she started in about "there were muslims in them buildings too" and then rambled on from there about that.
With her, it's not just what she says, but more about what she promotes.(IMO)
I would like to meet some people on here in person, but not at a bar(maybe lunch or something), and you, Boomer, Glitter, etc. the list is to long. But there is a lot of animosity in that list.

sidekick wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree. I think we all know they're good people in all cultures. But when she says "i didn't write that though" she still was promoting the issue. Not once acknowledging the American people who went through it in pain and suffering. i remember last years 9/11 threads, she started in about "there were muslims in them buildings too" and then rambled on from there about that.
With her, it's not just what she says, but more about what she promotes.(IMO)
I would like to meet some people on here in person, but not at a bar(maybe lunch or something), and you, Boomer, Glitter, etc. the list is to long. But there is a lot of animosity in that list.

I understand. We would like to meet you also. I do understand that there were all cultures that died in the 9/11 attacks. My only problem is that if you are here in America and enjoying the freedoms that our men and women have fought and died for, I would think that the others would say and proclaim that they are Americans first.

sidekick wrote:

<quoted text>
But there is a lot of animosity in that list.

There really is no animosity on whatever list you have formulated in your mind. Reader took exception to the "drivel" thread I started and that I didn't include other people on the poll, i.e. Bob, George. I explained why. I can get along and be tolerant with anyone and enjoy their company despite any differences of opinion. It was apparent that the word "discussion" does not exist in her vernacular.

WDRussell wrote:

You call it the Catholic church.
You call it the Mormon church.
In Nevada they just call them brothels.

We just call Columbiana and Jefferson counties toilets. Unflushed toilets.

Enzyte Bob wrote:

<quoted text>
Ummmmmmmm ... that begs the question: What do think I think you are?

Do you mean "what do I think you are?"

I have no clue. I get the impression by the way you carry on about "remaining outside of 270" most people inside are a bunch of thugs or worse. We couldn't be further from that.

I actually live outside of 270, far west. But...inhabit inside most of the day. Doesn't bother me. Most of the "good" stuff is inside of 270 for me--museum, restaurants (not freaking chains!), Short North, etc.

gokeefe wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you mean "what do I think you are?"
I have no clue. I get the impression by the way you carry on about "remaining outside of 270" most people inside are a bunch of thugs or worse. We couldn't be further from that.
I actually live outside of 270, far west. But...inhabit inside most of the day. Doesn't bother me. Most of the "good" stuff is inside of 270 for me--museum, restaurants (not freaking chains!), Short North, etc.

Are you an artist?

gokeefe wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you mean "what do I think you are?"
I have no clue. I get the impression by the way you carry on about "remaining outside of 270" most people inside are a bunch of thugs or worse. We couldn't be further from that.
I actually live outside of 270, far west. But...inhabit inside most of the day. Doesn't bother me. Most of the "good" stuff is inside of 270 for me--museum, restaurants (not freaking chains!), Short North, etc.

You do realize that was meant as a joke, don't you?

Enzyte Bob wrote:

<quoted text>
You do realize that was meant as a joke, don't you?

We don't laugh inside of 270.

GlitterSucks wrote:

<quoted text>
We don't laugh inside of 270.

If I had to live where you do, I wouldn't either.

sidekick wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you an artist?

Have you been talking to Glitter's hubby? LMAO. NO. But I do happen to like O'Keeffe (note the misspelling in my name).

Enzyte Bob wrote:

<quoted text>
You do realize that was meant as a joke, don't you?

It's not always easy to tell without context.

I was, after all, a comm major in college (an overachiever, actually--comm, business, English/professional writing.) I don't rely 100% on what's said here because sometimes there are multiple interpretations. Capice?

GlitterSucks wrote:

<quoted text>
We don't laugh inside of 270.

I laugh, I cry, I breathe, I live every day inside of 270. The darned military types keep me in stitches one moment, wanting to tear my hair out the next..../sigh.

Enzyte Bob wrote:

<quoted text>
If I had to live where you do, I wouldn't either.

Did you google my property? I'm one of the select, fortunate ones, such as you. I laugh outside of 270 also.

The Salvation Army’s “Position Statement” on homosexuality, found on its Web site, reads in part:“The Salvation Army does not consider same-sex orientation blameworthy in itself. Homosexual conduct, like heterosexual conduct, requires individual responsibility and must be guided by the light of scriptural teaching. Scripture forbids sexual intimacy between members of the same sex. The Salvation Army believes, therefore, that Christians whose sexual orientation is primarily or exclusively same-sex are called upon to embrace celibacy as a way of life.”

The Salvation Army’s national office does not employ registered lobbyists, but its leaders have occasionally made news by meeting with government officials. In 2001, The Washington Post obtained a Salvation Army document that said the administration of President George W. Bush had promised to honor a Salvation Army request: that religious charities receiving federal money be exempt from local gay antidiscrimination laws. The day the request became public, the Bush administration said it was being denied.

And in 2004, in response to a City Council ordinance requiring that organizations with city contracts offer benefits to gay employees’ partners, the Salvation Army threatened to stop operating in New York City. In 2006, the New York State Court of Appeals ruled that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg did not have to enforce the ordinance, which had been enacted over his veto; the Salvation Army never left New York City.

George Hood, a Salvation Army spokesman, said all revenue from Salvation Army thrift stores is used locally. But he said a small percentage of money dropped into the red kettles finds its way to Washington — where it helps to pay the salaries of politically active staff members like Mr. Hood. Every local unit pays 10 percent of its revenue to a state or regional division — there are 40 divisions in the United States — and every division pays 10 percent of its revenue to one of four national territories, each of which foots a quarter of the national budget.

In other words, of a dollar dropped into a red kettle in New York City, a quarter of a penny ends up at national headquarters, where conversations with the government — not lobbying, Mr. Hood says — may take place.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/24/us/beliefs-...

White House Rejects Salvation Army Proposal - ABC News
White House Rejects Salvation Army Proposal.... called a "circular" in exchange for the Salvation Army's support for President Bush's faith-based initiative.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story... -

The CATHOLIC CHURCH IS DESTROYING The CATHOLIC CHURCH